African Unification Day

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#23 Dec 29, 2013
yup wrote:
<quoted text> so its "neanderthal" to stick around and raise the baby you father? You find dignity in abandoning your young to mothers forced into welfare or postitution to raise them without the fathers support, other than maybe coming around to "git some", or hide from warrants? Never heard of Rhodesia? Try just reading this thread, is mentioned by one of your "african brothers". You people have no power because time and time again your kind abuse the hell out of it. Look at Obummer, could've done more for race relations than any other human in history, including Mandela, instead he acts like he was appointed king, guaranteeing no other black president for a LONG time. You're an ignoramous who's spent so much effort "being black" that you ignored the more important things, like learning geography and general history. "Some idiot made us slaves", you better go study the history of slavery, its been used by blacks as long as anybody, enslaving themselves, and selling YOU to us 500 years ago. There's the single most relevent fact to american history and race relations there is, but you morons choose to ignore it entirely because it let's you sit at home pointing fingers at "whitey" for all your shortcomings so you have an excuse to milk the system for freebies and special consideration when in fact you deserve NONE. You sure don't see americans of chinese or irish heritage whining to this day about their pre 20th century ancestors woes, begging for jobs they can't do "cos dey chinese". They won their freedom and assimilated or left. You are welcome to do the same, a full 150yrs later than they did. Sitting in a country you hate bragging about your barbaric african heritage like it was Rome at its apex and acting like WE are the barbarians is stereotypical nygereze. Go ignore your half dozen kids by a half dozen different welfare whores and dance around in your ugly as hell african dress at some "we special" party.
Fool, WTF are you talking about? White people did not invent family units and civilization. Africans did. My point is why should we imitate those who came up only in the last civilizations, namely Greece and Rome when our own civilization go so much further back? It makes no sense to prefer inferior over superior. The Greeks had enough sense to copy Africa. That is what made them great. Now, you want to think that the copy is greater than the original. You Neanderthals have lost your minds, if you ever had one.

Whites came from neandertahl. But when Neanderthal was still living in caves and eating raw meat, including dead human bodies, Africans built great civilizations in Egypt, Ethiopia, and Zimbabwe. Even Hindu civilization is older than anything in Europe. And Africa is older than India.

Take your ignorance of history and human origins somewhere else. There is no place for your stupid opinions in black folks discussions.
yup

United States

#25 Dec 29, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Fool, WTF are you talking about? White people did not invent family units and civilization. Africans did. My point is why should we imitate those who came up only in the last civilizations, namely Greece and Rome when our own civilization go so much further back? It makes no sense to prefer inferior over superior. The Greeks had enough sense to copy Africa. That is what made them great. Now, you want to think that the copy is greater than the original. You Neanderthals have lost your minds, if you ever had one.
Whites came from neandertahl. But when Neanderthal was still living in caves and eating raw meat, including dead human bodies, Africans built great civilizations in Egypt, Ethiopia, and Zimbabwe. Even Hindu civilization is older than anything in Europe. And Africa is older than India.
Take your ignorance of history and human origins somewhere else. There is no place for your stupid opinions in black folks discussions.
well at least that's a more coherent argument, so ill commend you for it. Sadly, a lot of its speculation and propaganda. Claiming all of civilization was born in africa is reach, half of what you've focused on learning is black glorification. Suggesting the white race sprung from neanderthals proves that. Even if we had, it would only prove that neanderthals mustve been smarter than the blacks they bred with to do it, because science has proven humans did NOT evolve from neanderthals, so what you're suggesting is that white skin came from neanderthals interbreeding with blacks humans. And history pretty clearly shows that while every other continent on the planet has progressed over the last 2 or 3000 years, africa has stayed the same primitive warring continent it has always been, devoid of current technology save for what outsiders bring to pillage and leave. Don't misunderstand me, I don't approve of abuses in africa by outsiders, slavery, or mistreatment of anyone by anyone else, but wherever is blackest, the world over, its the worst. "There goes the neighborhood" has proved to be true everywhere, from neighborhoods to nations.
yup

United States

#26 Dec 29, 2013
In short, it doesn't matter what happened 200 thousand years ago, 10000 years ago, or 50 years ago. What matters is right now, and frankly, no race on the planet has the right to be as arrogant as you are. I may be a dick, but at least I'm honest, you on the other hand are in total denial.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#28 Dec 30, 2013
black is beautiful wrote:
<quoted text> we complain all the time about how blacks think that they are separated from white people but we are the ones doing it like the last sentence of the paragraph. We didn't invent anything except bbq ribs , collard greens, ox trail and crap like that. If we ate canning to be African American, why don't we do back and live there...
You can take an African out of Africa. But you cannot take Africa out of an African. I do not care who it displeases. Facts are facts. We are Africans. Period. And I will not allow nitwits like you lie to me and tell me otherwise. The truth shall make you free.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#29 Dec 30, 2013
yup wrote:
<quoted text> well at least that's a more coherent argument, so ill commend you for it. Sadly, a lot of its speculation and propaganda. Claiming all of civilization was born in africa is reach, half of what you've focused on learning is black glorification.
No. I do not think I said all civilization was "born in Africa". What I meant to say is that all civilization has foundation in Africa. There were uncivilized cavemen in Europe. But they had to learn what tiny degree of civilization that we now see among them, they had to learn it from Africa, although imperfectly. That's what is important. They did not get it all correctly. They only learned water down offshoots of it.

I was reading Martin Luther King this morning. He said, "the great tragedy is that Christianity failed to see that he had the revolutionary edge." That is a Christian minister speaking. He called it a "great tragedy". What he is talking about is that Jesus came to Free the Slaves. But 2,000 years later, Europeans were still holding Africans in slavery and calling themselves "Christians". What a farce! How could that be?

First of all, the Romans were so evil that they lied to themselves. Jesus said, "I have come to Free the Slaves." But the evil whites translated it as "I have come to set the captives free." They tricked us by avoiding mentioning slaves. By tricking us slaves, then ended up tricking themselves. They had no idea that Christianity was against slavery from day one. Jesus said so in his first public ministry.

We have a similar situation in Islam where the pagan Hindus who converted to Islam identify so strongly with the white man that they perverted The Quran when they translated it. In the First Revelation to Muhammad, GOD said "Seeth thou one who preventth a slave from Praying." But to please the white Europeans Brother Yusuf Ali translated "slave" are "votary". He avoided using the word "slave", and thereby sidetracked the whole issue. "Votary" means someone who is devoted to GOD such as a priest or nun. Sometimes they will say "servant". But when you learn some Arabic one of the first things you will learn is that the word for slave is "abd". When you read those Verses in Arabic, they say "abd". They do not say anything about any nuns. GOD was talking about slaves in the First Revelation which is exactly what Jesus was talking about. So Yusuf Ali may or may not have known what he was translating. The bottom line is he missed the boat entirely by not mentioning "slaves". As a result, there have been some Muslims who enslaved people just as there have been many Christians who did it. This is the sort of thing I am talking about. Westerners call themselves Christians and civilized. But the fail to see the real meanings of the words "Christian" and civilized". But Africans have known all along what it meant. So it makes no sense for us to copy a bunch of fools who have no clue.

Continued below...

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#30 Dec 30, 2013
Continued from above…
yup wrote:
<quoted text> Suggesting the white race sprung from neanderthals proves that.
That is undeniable science.

yup wrote:
<quoted text> Even if we had, it would only prove that neanderthals mustve been smarter than the blacks they bred with to do it, because science has proven humans did NOT evolve from neanderthals, so what you're suggesting is that white skin came from neanderthals interbreeding with blacks humans.
I am not talking about evolution or Drawinism. I am talking about the proven scientific fact that whites have neandertahil genes in them.

yup wrote:
<quoted text> And history pretty clearly shows that while every other continent on the planet has progressed over the last 2 or 3000 years, africa has stayed the same primitive warring continent it has always been, devoid of current technology save for what outsiders bring to pillage and leave.
All of your technology is based on the mathematics and sciences that came from Africa. True, the enslavement of Africans has held back our progress the past 2,000 years or so. But it was about 50,000 years and probably much longer, closer to 200,000 years of African culture and civilization before there were any whites at all on earth, before mankind mixed with neandertahl. This is also an indisputable scientific fact.

yup wrote:
<quoted text> Don't misunderstand me, I don't approve of abuses in africa by outsiders, slavery, or mistreatment of anyone by anyone else, but wherever is blackest, the world over, its the worst. "There goes the neighborhood" has proved to be true everywhere, from neighborhoods to nations.
That is not true. I for one do not Want to belike white people. I have turned this over and over in my mind trying to figure out why I feel this way. Why anybody and everybody who has a choice ALWAYS choose African identity over white identity even when they themselves look 100% white. But think about it. Who wants to be known as slaveholders? Who want to have their moms and sisters walking around half naked all the time? Etc. etc., etc. There are many, many examples of white people’s inhumanity and lack of morality and civilization. Who wants that? We are poorer than whites in general. I know that. But that is only a material poverty. When we talk about morality and civilization, we are talking about a higher form of prosperity; spiritual prosperity. That is what we non-whites have. And I for one would not trade it for all the material wealth in the world.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#32 Dec 30, 2013
yup wrote:
In short, it doesn't matter what happened 200 thousand years ago, 10000 years ago, or 50 years ago. What matters is right now, and frankly, no race on the planet has the right to be as arrogant as you are. I may be a dick, but at least I'm honest, you on the other hand are in total denial.
I am a historian. And you are stupid enough to try to convince that that history does not matter. Get lost.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#33 Dec 30, 2013
real talk wrote:
<quoted text>damn, you go yup. I was gonna say something but you pretty much said it all.what about ebonics because they don't know proper English do they want to be lazy as usual and come up with something stupid again jus cause they don't and can't learn
Ebonics is another example. We have the most scientific and efficient languages in Africa. I am talking about the grammar and syntax and logic and clear thinking. We know it is the best because this is what GOD spoke to Moses in our languages, not English, German or French, etc. The Old Testament is largely in Hebrew, if not exclusively. The New testament is in Aramaic. The Quran is in Ancient Arabic. Not one Scripture is in any European languages. Even the Hindu texts are in non-European languages.

So we learned to think in African languages. When we learned English, all we did was superimpose English words over African grammar and Syntax. As a result, Ebonics is far more logically and efficient that the Queen's English. For example, in the Queen's English I would "You are stupid". But in Ebonics I say "You stupid". Ebonics gets the idea across with only two words where as you stupid white people use three words.
yup

United States

#35 Dec 30, 2013
real talk wrote:
<quoted text>damn, you go yup. I was gonna say something but you pretty much said it all.what about ebonics because they don't know proper English do they want to be lazy as usual and come up with something stupid again jus cause they don't and can't learn
because this person is arguing intelligibly. I may not agree with him, but despite our differences this is reasonable discourse. I'm not inherently racist, only realistic with a jaded opinion because st louis has become such a pit of crime. I have no doubt many of his claims are correct and accurate. Just not all. I have way more respect for someone who has made the effort to learn, even though some of what's absorbed is slanted. We have been miseducated about thing too. We could fairly easily come to terms, despite mutual insults. I've been more offensive than I really meant to, it creeps in on st louis racial subjects. They've handled it fairly well, they deserve more respect than to equate them with the worst street urchins on the north side.
yup

United States

#36 Dec 30, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
I am a historian. And you are stupid enough to try to convince that that history does not matter. Get lost.
youre a lousy historian. You've learned everything they teach in black propaganda school and ignored the rest. You assume you're talking to a moron, you know what that does. You're also clinging to false beliefs about 20000yr old ancestors as a source of pride, believing convenient half truths about the human race and civilization, and hurting your own arguments wih doublespeak. Everything printed in mainstream history isn't a lie to hold back or discredit that balck race. I won't deny some due credit has been wrongly withheld in some writings, but you're making some pretty big self serving leaps based on weak data.
yup

United States

#37 Dec 30, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Ebonics is another example. We have the most scientific and efficient languages in Africa. I am talking about the grammar and syntax and logic and clear thinking. We know it is the best because this is what GOD spoke to Moses in our languages, not English, German or French, etc. The Old Testament is largely in Hebrew, if not exclusively. The New testament is in Aramaic. The Quran is in Ancient Arabic. Not one Scripture is in any European languages. Even the Hindu texts are in non-European languages.
So we learned to think in African languages. When we learned English, all we did was superimpose English words over African grammar and Syntax. As a result, Ebonics is far more logically and efficient that the Queen's English. For example, in the Queen's English I would "You are stupid". But in Ebonics I say "You stupid". Ebonics gets the idea across with only two words where as you stupid white people use three words.
you should've left them out of the argument, because you really dumbed yourself down here. Claiming leaving out large important parts of essential grammer, or butchering sentences beyond comprehension, is intelligent, is the by far the most preposterous(or just stupid) thing you've said. Ebonics butchers, muddles, and confuses communication, period. "You be stupid" is more like ebonics, "you stupid" sounds more like a foreigner with a poor grasp of the language as yet, and "you be stupid" is a COMMAND. "She my baby mama" sounds like she gave birth as an infant, "you is" is grammatically incorrect and hugely ignorant sounding. I feel the same way about sounthern drawls so thick they can't be understood, the difference is an educated southerner doesn't go out of her way to mangle their printed communications. Chillins ain't oughta be graduated dey spell like dis. Ain't should get dey chee-ek at de fust de munt eeder. Schools teach until the kids destroy them, then they get bussed to another good school til it loses its accreditation and becomes so violent the people that actually live nearby start homeschooling. It ain't white kids or even hispanics doing that.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#39 Jan 3, 2014
real talk wrote:
<quoted text> the new testament is in Greek dumbass and ebonics is jus lazy talk.period. you can try and make it sound like it is meant that way but we both know that it sounds and is stupid. The words with th in it is now f...example...teeth...teef.... lol..really
Okay clown, let's look it up:

Luke 18-19:
“The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
"He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free,

"19
to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”( http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/... )

Issaiah 61:1:

"New American Standard Bible
The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me, Because the LORD has anointed me To bring good news to the afflicted; He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, To proclaim liberty to captives And freedom to prisoners;" ( http://biblehub.com/isaiah/61-1.htm )

"New Living Translation
"Go back to Pharaoh," the LORD commanded Moses. "Tell him,'This is what the LORD, the God of the Hebrews, says: Let my people go, so they can worship me.." ( http://biblehub.com/exodus/9-1.htm )

Surah 96: 9-19:

Hast thou seen him who dissuadeth (9) A slave when he prayeth?(10) Hast thou seen if he relieth on the guidance (of Allah)(11) Or enjoineth piety?(12) Hast thou seen if he denieth (Allah's guidance) and is froward?(13) Is he then unaware that Allah seeth?(14) Nay, but if he cease not We will seize him by the forelock -(15) The lying, sinful forelock -(16) Then let him call upon his henchmen!(17) We will call the guards of hell.(18) Nay, Obey not thou him. But prostrate thyself, and draw near (unto Allah).(19)( http://www.quranexplorer.com/Quran/Default.as... )

Now what clown?>

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#40 Jan 3, 2014
yup wrote:
<quoted text> because this person is arguing intelligibly. I may not agree with him, but despite our differences this is reasonable discourse. I'm not inherently racist, only realistic with a jaded opinion because st louis has become such a pit of crime. I have no doubt many of his claims are correct and accurate. Just not all. I have way more respect for someone who has made the effort to learn, even though some of what's absorbed is slanted. We have been miseducated about thing too. We could fairly easily come to terms, despite mutual insults. I've been more offensive than I really meant to, it creeps in on st louis racial subjects..
I had this history professor who tried to convince me of hermeneutics in history. It just did not feel right. Obviously she did not know what she was talking about because she failed to explain it in a way that made sense. But, last night I was thinking this through, turning it over and over in my head and it became clear.

No two people see any one event exactly the same. For example, two eyewitnesses may see an accident. One is on the right side of the street and the other is on the other side of the street. They will report different versions to the police. One may not have seen which car cr9oss3ed the line because his view was blocked somehow. Similarly, no two historians will report history exactly the same. So it is helpful to get as many different points of view as possible.

But, I still have problems with that theory. I think it is more useful in things like legal work and theology. But as far as theology is =concerned as early as I can remember the old folks taught me to take no man's word for it, especially not the preacher's word. If a preacher says something from the pulpit he had better reference it with Verses from the Book. If he cannot justify it in the Book, reject it. That is Islam in a nutshell. My people were Christians. But they taught me Islam without realizing it.

But the biggest problem I have with hermeneutics in history is i allows the dogs off the leach. In other words, it allows the liars to get away with too many lies and not be held accountable. For example, there are many people who will say to you, "Hey I have a PHD. What ever I say is right." Then they will tell you a whole bunch of lies and expect you to believe them.

For an African, this is a major problem all around because the preachers (and translators) have lied to all of us. We have to research and study the Scriptures on our own in order to get half way to the truth. The preachers seldom tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. They lie all the time which is one thing that drove me and all of my family out of mainstream Christianity. All of the major prophets (Peace and Blessings be upon them all) preached against slavery. ALL OF THEM. It is simple really: as a Muslim, I accept all of the prophets. Therefore, they all have to agree on certain basics. If Moses was against slavery (and we know that he was because he killed a slaveholder even before GOD spoke to him), Isaiah also has to be against slavery. If Moses and Isaiah were both against slavery, then Jesus has to be against slavery. If Moses, Isaiah and Jesus were all against slavery, then Muhammad has to be against slavery. All of these men are prophets of the Same GOD. GOD is not going to tell one one thing and another something opposite. That makes no sense. But if you keep it simple, stupid, it all makes perfect sense. If it does not make sense to you, check the translation or the preacher.

In the social sciences teachers have lied against black people for 500 years and more. 99% of the historians have ignored and/or lied about the true place of Africa in history. So when an honest man like me comes along and tells the truth, it sounds strange to people. They even report me to the moderators. And the moderators are so ignorant and stupid, they do not know the truth either.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#41 Jan 3, 2014
yup wrote:
<quoted text> youre a lousy historian. You've learned everything they teach in black propaganda school and ignored the rest. You assume you're talking to a moron, you know what that does. You're also clinging to false beliefs about 20000yr old ancestors as a source of pride, believing convenient half truths about the human race and civilization, and hurting your own arguments wih doublespeak. Everything printed in mainstream history isn't a lie to hold back or discredit that balck race. I won't deny some due credit has been wrongly withheld in some writings, but you're making some pretty big self serving leaps based on weak data.
I am not concerned about pride as you say. I emphasize scientific methodology in study. Like I said above, everything has to be verified. Now, let me show you what I mean about 200,000 years.

"Anatomically modern humans arose in Africa about 200,000 years ago, and reached behavioral modernity about 50,000 years ago." The interesting thing about this statement is that we have found cultures in north Africa that goes back 200,000 years. That suggests that the Berber people, not black Africans, were the ones who had that culture. In fact, some will explicitly say as much. But the black racists went into an uproar when I quoted the statement that Berbers hade been in Africa for 200,000 years and made them change it. For the record, I do not believer the first humans were black. They lived in Africa and were therefor4e Africans. But that does not make them black. In fact, I find that blacks are a distinct minority in Africa.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#42 Jan 3, 2014
yup wrote:
<quoted text> you should've left them out of the argument, because you really dumbed yourself down here. Claiming leaving out large important parts of essential grammer, or butchering sentences beyond comprehension, is intelligent, is the by far the most preposterous(or just stupid) thing you've said.
It is simple really. All I am saying is that African grammar is different and more efficient that European. The same is true for Asian grammar. I learned this my studying European, Asian and African languages, especially Arabic. In Arabic, we say "Abdullah rich". We do not say "Abdullah is rich". And from a strictly Islamic viewpoint, Arabic is the oldest language in the world. The British are even trying to prove that English came from Arabic. And it probably did.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> Ebonics butchers, muddles, and confuses communication, period. "You be stupid" is more like ebonics, "you stupid" sounds more like a foreigner with a poor grasp of the language as yet, and "you be stupid" is a COMMAND. "She my baby mama" sounds like she gave birth as an infant, "you is" is grammatically incorrect and hugely ignorant sounding. I feel the same way about sounthern drawls so thick they can't be understood, the difference is an educated southerner doesn't go out of her way to mangle their printed communications. Chillins ain't oughta be graduated dey spell like dis. Ain't should get dey chee-ek at de fust de munt eeder. Schools teach until the kids destroy them, then they get bussed to another good school til it loses its accreditation and becomes so violent the people that actually live nearby start homeschooling. It ain't white kids or even hispanics doing that.
Look, I agree that black people really need to sit down and do some serious and critical self-analysis. But that is not easy when we spend all of our time trying to fight off white racism.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#43 Jan 20, 2014
yup wrote:
<quoted text> so its "neanderthal" to stick around and raise the baby you father?
Actually, it is white racistdogs who refuse to take responsibility for their children in our community.Look at Thomas Jefferson. Het set the stabndard. That bastard did not even have the decency to free his own children. Punks like him wote laws that said the the children of slave women would always be slaves. That is how slvery worked. Most did free their children. But the powerful ones like Jefferson even denied being the fahers. Theyhad to DNA him to prove that he was.
Another example was Mark Anthoby wioth Cleopatra. That bastard did not own his children. Of course lairs are trying to claim that he did. But any reasonable persdomn lnows that he did not which is why Cleopatra killed them and committed suicide.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> You find dignity in abandoning your young to mothers forced into welfare or postitution to raise them without the fathers support, other than maybe coming around to "git some", or hide from warrants?
Well, it was white racist homosexuals who spread HI+V in Africa and in this community. That is the ONLY way it could have come into our community.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> Never heard of Rhodesia?
I heard of that Rhodes dog. I ama historian.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> Look at Obummer, could've done more for race relations than any other human in history, including Mandela, instead he acts like he was appointed king, guaranteeing no other black president for a LONG time.
You ar3e right about that. But I have criticized Obama so much aND SO LONG, a voice in the wilderness that I am sick and tired of mentionig his name or hearing it. But it were white scum that out Obama in power because he promised to put down the African Revolution by such means as "decapitating" Africanleaders like Qadafi. Go figure.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> You're an ignoramous who's spent so much effort "being black" that you ignored the more important things, like learning geography and general history.
Dog, I do not "be black". I am a Pan-Africanist who works every day to ubite black Africa with Bereber and Arab Africa, plus the Arabian Peninsula.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> "Some idiot made us slaves", you better go study the history of slavery, its been used by blacks as long as anybody, enslaving themselves, and selling YOU to us 500 years ago.
It takes two to tango.Nobody can sell anybody if dogs like you were not buying.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#44 Jan 20, 2014
Continued from above...
yup wrote:
<quoted text> There's the single most relevent fact to american history and race relations there is, but you morons choose to ignore it entirely because it let's you sit at home pointing fingers at "whitey" for all your shortcomings so you have an excuse to milk the system for freebies and special consideration when in fact you deserve NONE.
Everybody who works deserves to be paid. So far, we have not been paid for our slave labor yet.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> You sure don't see americans of chinese or irish heritage whining to this day about their pre 20th century ancestors woes, begging for jobs they can't do "cos dey chinese".
Dog, we do not see anyChinese slaves either.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> They won their freedom and assimilated or left.
Dog, nobodywants to "assimilate" with neaderthalssavahges like you, especially not the Chinese. LOL!!!Chinese assimilate with blacks and Arabs a lot quicker thabn they will wth a neanderthal.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> You are welcome to do the same, a full 150yrs later than they did. Sitting in a country you hate bragging about your barbaric african heritage like it was Rome at its apex and acting like WE are the barbarians is stereotypical nygereze.
Dog, I do not hate this country. My native American ancestors still own this land and I have inherited it from them. What I hate is white racist dogs like you. Let's be clear.
yup wrote:
<quoted text> Go ignore your half dozen kids by a half dozen different welfare whores and dance around in your ugly as hell african dress at some "we special" party.
B-word, I have three kids all by the same woman and five grandkids all bythe same women for each son. It runs in my African/Native American/Japanese/Jewish family. I won't deny any of them. There was even a Bristiosh Chrsitian in the Revolutionary War.(He did not own slaves and he did marry us.) Now go jump intio the fire.

“It ain't gonna suck itself.”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#46 Jan 24, 2014
http://www.wackbag.com/threads/hiv-positive-m...

I dare you to join the forum and spew your ideological bullshit.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#47 Jan 25, 2014
Hoover Niebold wrote:
http://www.wackbag.com/threads /hiv-positive-man-has-unprotec ted-sex-with-over-30-individua ls.155178/
I dare you to join the forum and spew your ideological bullshit.
The tone and level of discourse in much higher thant it is here. So I signed up. Thanks for the invite.

“It ain't gonna suck itself.”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#48 Jan 25, 2014

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

St. Louis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mentally Insane Topix Stalker 12 hr Jeff Beauregard S... 19
News Powerful Photos Blast The Media's Portrayal Of ... (Aug '14) 17 hr Straight talking ... 458
Lawyer Bruce Hilton (Aug '11) 22 hr dissatified 8
Does the maury show make black people look bad? (Jan '11) Fri Psh 84
Want FAKE news?? =CBS Scott Pelley Fri Clark 7
Who are the Hells Angels MC clubs in St. Louis,... (May '15) Jun 21 Assless Chaps 32
CBS number 1 in real fake news Jun 21 Fire 3

St. Louis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

St. Louis Mortgages