It's interesting this notion of fat...IF you look at classic art many women were depicted as rubinesque or full figured lending to the idea that REAL WOMEN have curves.Something I don't understand, why are the women so big out there but the men are normal size?
That beautiful women aren't stick figures,portraits of little boys or anorexic throw backs to a time when food was scarce.
In fact the notion of ample shape as beauty came into existence BECAUSE people were able to eat and EATING IS A SIGN OF WEALTH prosperity and health.
This idea of round, thick healthy women can be traced back to primitive artifacts still revered today such as the earth mother image, goddesses of fertility and even the moon.
It's only sick self depreciating women with low self esteem,who find issue with being thick or having curves.
Only in the last two centuries has the image of women resembling men been seen as beautiful.
Men by in large want women who have AT LEAST SOME curves as it means she is a survivor, resourceful and healthy.
I'm curious as to why ,as some would say, "skinny bytches" ALWAYS have an issue with thick women. Why these plague struck bytches are constantly touting their misshapen twa-ts as the standard when THE VAST MAJORITY OF HISTORY says different and still does considering the acceptability from real MEN.
IN THE END real men are the only ones that thick, rubinesque women have to worry about...