Letter: Republicans: The party of 'no'

Dec 15, 2010 Full story: Burlington Free Press 399

Writing as an indepen dent Vermonter whose grandfather served for two decades as Vermont's Re publican secretary of state, it seems to me a tragedy that the national Republi can Party is becoming the party of 'NO.' 'NO' to anything President Obama supports, thus 'NO' to true bipartisanship.

Full Story
First Prev
of 20
Next Last

Since: Jan 09

Bennington, VT

#389 Jan 31, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems I wind you right wingers up and you follow me around whining. I'm the Pied Pier of right wing kooks. You follow me like the rats followed the piper...
Noticed can't dispute what was said. If want fun Find things Lib's have said like in 2000 ccampain "Iraq has WMD's and it elected I will use military to get ride of them" After they rant & rave saying he's criminal and should be in jail then tell them it was Kerry. They then say "He must have had a good reason". Joe kennedy saying Hitler was someone America can work with say " I don't know enough about Hitler" Now as you don't dispute what I say I must be right.
TruthTeller

Keene, NH

#390 Jan 31, 2011
j w mcsherry wrote:
<quoted text>Noticed can't dispute what was said. If want fun Find things Lib's have said like in 2000 ccampain "Iraq has WMD's and it elected I will use military to get ride of them" After they rant & rave saying he's criminal and should be in jail then tell them it was Kerry. They then say "He must have had a good reason". Joe kennedy saying Hitler was someone America can work with say " I don't know enough about Hitler" Now as you don't dispute what I say I must be right.
You morons can't be disputed! Its not that you are right, its because you are too stupid to learn and understand that your facts are wrong. Now move along stupid.
Concerned

Bennington, VT

#391 Jan 31, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how you right wing kooks always come with claims of information that always proves you right -- but you never show it -- just like mccarthy always had the evidence, but never showed it...
RFK was not a follower of mccarthy. Now stop your idiot lying.
Suggest you do your homework! I gave you one source and indicated there are many sources by which you can conduct your own search, on RFK and Mc Carthy, to find the evidence of what I stated. If you knew anything about history you would not spew forth the garbage you do. As noted by myself and others-you are only focused on calling names, insults and misdirection. That is not only straight out of the Liberal faction’s playbook but all found in Nazi propaganda playbook. Try reading "Julius Streicher, the man who persuaded a nation to hate Jews" by Randall L. Bytwerk Just one of many sources on the subject). You will find everything you do, is a mirror image of the tactics of the Nazi's program of name calling, insults, misinformation, misdirection etc. Your ignorance is astounding. If you want to convince someone of something and/or prove them wrong-then back up your misguided statements with data/facts.
jgadsden

Bellows Falls, VT

#392 Jan 31, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
You morons can't be disputed! Its not that you are right, its because you are too stupid to learn and understand that your facts are wrong. Now move along stupid.
I am still waiting for you to put up a list of your prior posts...
but even you can't bear to read them again!

Did you even look into the resources provided to you?
of course not...
you are shallow.
Concerned

Bennington, VT

#393 Jan 31, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
You morons can't be disputed! Its not that you are right, its because you are too stupid to learn and understand that your facts are wrong. Now move along stupid.
Here is another source for you-Jospeh Goebbel's priciples of propoganda:http://www.psywarri or.com/Goebbels.html

And another source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_propaganda
Propaganda must not investigate the truth objectively and, in so far as it is favourable to the other side, present it according to the theoretical rules of justice; yet it must present only that aspect of the truth which is favourable to its own side.(...) The receptive powers of the masses are very restricted, and their understanding is feeble. On the other hand, they quickly forget. Such being the case, all effective propaganda must be confined to a few bare essentials and those must be expressed as far as possible in stereotyped formulas. These slogans should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea that has been put forward.(...) Every change that is made in the subject of a propagandist message must always emphasize the same conclusion. The leading slogan must of course be illustrated in many ways and from
Realtruthteller

Brattleboro, VT

#394 Jan 31, 2011
Concerned wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is another source for you-Jospeh Goebbel's priciples of propoganda:http://www.psywarri or.com/Goebbels.html
And another source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_propaganda
Propaganda must not investigate the truth objectively and, in so far as it is favourable to the other side, present it according to the theoretical rules of justice; yet it must present only that aspect of the truth which is favourable to its own side.(...) The receptive powers of the masses are very restricted, and their understanding is feeble. On the other hand, they quickly forget. Such being the case, all effective propaganda must be confined to a few bare essentials and those must be expressed as far as possible in stereotyped formulas. These slogans should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea that has been put forward.(...) Every change that is made in the subject of a propagandist message must always emphasize the same conclusion. The leading slogan must of course be illustrated in many ways and from
Are you saying Truth Teller is a nazi?

Since: Jan 09

Graniteville, VT

#395 Jan 31, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
You morons can't be disputed! Its not that you are right, its because you are too stupid to learn and understand that your facts are wrong. Now move along stupid.
AGAIN Ultra/LiberalDemocrat no answer just 3rd grade name calling. Now try telling me why unemployment at ovet 9% for almost 2 years under Obama is so good when only had a high of 7.9% under Bush?
Concerned

Manchester Center, VT

#396 Feb 1, 2011
Realtruthteller wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you saying Truth Teller is a nazi?
Good question-TT's whole method of writing/words/actions seem to be right out of their playbook. Case of if it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck-well! You have to decide for yourself.
TruthTeller

Keene, NH

#397 Feb 2, 2011
Concerned wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is another source for you-Jospeh Goebbel's priciples of propoganda:http://www.psywarri or.com/Goebbels.html
And another source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_propaganda
Propaganda must not investigate the truth objectively and, in so far as it is favourable to the other side, present it according to the theoretical rules of justice; yet it must present only that aspect of the truth which is favourable to its own side.(...) The receptive powers of the masses are very restricted, and their understanding is feeble. On the other hand, they quickly forget. Such being the case, all effective propaganda must be confined to a few bare essentials and those must be expressed as far as possible in stereotyped formulas. These slogans should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea that has been put forward.(...) Every change that is made in the subject of a propagandist message must always emphasize the same conclusion. The leading slogan must of course be illustrated in many ways and from
Wikipedia is not an authoritative source. Colleges do not allow students to use it for research.-- Your use is another example of right wingers picking "facts" that suit their spin on reality. Not that any right winger has the mental capability to understand factual truth, vs. right wing fiction.
TruthTeller

Keene, NH

#398 Feb 2, 2011
Concerned wrote:
<quoted text>
Good question-TT's whole method of writing/words/actions seem to be right out of their playbook. Case of if it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck-well! You have to decide for yourself.
The only play book here is to correct the lies of right wing morons.
Moses

Hoosick Falls, NY

#399 Feb 2, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
Wikipedia is not an authoritative source. Colleges do not allow students to use it for research.-- Your use is another example of right wingers picking "facts" that suit their spin on reality. Not that any right winger has the mental capability to understand factual truth, vs. right wing fiction.
Wikipedia is not perfect but it is a credible research source. College professors do let people us Wikipedia but don't like it to be an only source citation which is no problem because the bibliography following each subject is a good place to begin research on almost any subject.

At least no one can accuse you of "picking facts" since you never use facts in your arguments. As far as I can tell you should change your name from Truth Teller to Name Caller.
Concerned

Manchester Center, VT

#400 Feb 2, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
Wikipedia is not an authoritative source. Colleges do not allow students to use it for research.-- Your use is another example of right wingers picking "facts" that suit their spin on reality. Not that any right winger has the mental capability to understand factual truth, vs. right wing fiction.
There are numerous places to find the info I have put forth- If you read the Wikipedia article you will find more (bi-partisan) sources at the end of the article. You can also get the reading amterial I suggest and or seacrh for futher date on the net. I have come tothe conclusion tat you have no clue as to what is "left" and what is "right" actually in reality there is neither-they are just buzz words conjured by the media to divide and separate people.

Since you are a self describe "left winger" how about tell us jus exactly what you do believe-I doubt even you do not really know, only think you know. Take this little quiz http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/ . Then if you have the stones it takes, get back to us with your results.

Predction: TT will not take the test, only continue to rant on in their mentally blind, foolish, ignorant manner.
TruthTeller

Keene, NH

#401 Feb 2, 2011
Moses wrote:
<quoted text>
Wikipedia is not perfect but it is a credible research source. College professors do let people us Wikipedia but don't like it to be an only source citation which is no problem because the bibliography following each subject is a good place to begin research on almost any subject.
At least no one can accuse you of "picking facts" since you never use facts in your arguments. As far as I can tell you should change your name from Truth Teller to Name Caller.
I'll rephrase: First-rate colleges do not let their students use Wikipedia as a source. But hey thanks for proving again that right wingers don't get facts when the facts are not what they want to believe!
TruthTeller

Keene, NH

#402 Feb 3, 2011
Concerned wrote:
<quoted text>
There are numerous places to find the info I have put forth- If you read the Wikipedia article you will find more (bi-partisan) sources at the end of the article. You can also get the reading amterial I suggest and or seacrh for futher date on the net. I have come tothe conclusion tat you have no clue as to what is "left" and what is "right" actually in reality there is neither-they are just buzz words conjured by the media to divide and separate people.
Since you are a self describe "left winger" how about tell us jus exactly what you do believe-I doubt even you do not really know, only think you know. Take this little quiz http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/ . Then if you have the stones it takes, get back to us with your results.
Predction: TT will not take the test, only continue to rant on in their mentally blind, foolish, ignorant manner.
I never said I was a left-winger. I said I wasn't right winger. Work on your reading comprehension problem.
Moses

Hoosick Falls, NY

#403 Feb 3, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll rephrase: First-rate colleges do not let their students use Wikipedia as a source. But hey thanks for proving again that right wingers don't get facts when the facts are not what they want to believe!
Ok what first rate college are you talking about? I'll repeat what I said. Teachers don't let college students use Wikipedia as their only source. And they don't really want them to use any encyclopedia as their only source as well.

So where are your facts. What "First-rate" college won't let their students use Wikipedia as a source. Who is the professor and how do you know it applies to all "First-rate" colleges the way you say as opposed to the way I say. It isn't just first rate colleges you ninny it is every teacher everywhere who wants students how to research a subject. Accuracy of Wikipedia is not the biggest problem. It is because it is too easy to use that is the problem.
Concerned

Manchester Center, VT

#404 Feb 3, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said I was a left-winger. I said I wasn't right winger. Work on your reading comprehension problem.
My reading ability is quite good. As to Comprehension well,your writing points to one from the left side of the spectrum. However, since you claim not to be a "left winger" or a "right winger" then I guess you must be a "middle winger". How did you come out on the political quiz? OOps I forgot you don't answer questions, read evidence, or provide evidence for your claims-Oh well
Folks TT says they are not a "right winger", nor are they a "left winger" and I am sure they will come back and claim they are not a "middle winger"-so what is left? I would say a mentally blind foolish "putz winger". Someone who gets their kicks and giggles from trying to jerk people around. How very pathetic.
Concerned

Manchester Center, VT

#405 Feb 3, 2011
TruthTeller wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll rephrase: First-rate colleges do not let their students use Wikipedia as a source. But hey thanks for proving again that right wingers don't get facts when the facts are not what they want to believe!
Don't you really realize what an ignorant statement you just mademade?

Colleges, first rate or not, do not dedicate what sources a student may use in their research. They may recommend certain sources, they may note some sources are not as reliable as others but they do not stop students from exploring all sources, both sides of an issue. It is now clear that you either did not go to college or you attended one in a country where students are provided limited access to information/data and/or told what to do. This would indicate that you have had no training in critical analysis, or cause and effect analysis etc. Thus you plainly show why you never answer questions or provide evidence of your claims. You do not know how . I challenge you to prove me and others wrong, not with words spewed forth blindly, but with hard objective evidence to back up any and all the claims you have made thus far.
jgadsden

Bellows Falls, VT

#406 Feb 3, 2011
Concerned wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you really realize what an ignorant statement you just made?
aren't you tired of this troll yet?

I thought you answered him fully many posts ago when you said Wiki is a good source for SOURCES...

I think wiki does provide a good first source and one that avoids the claims of bias...(which is what TT was say about ANY other source you quoted...otherwise he would finally have to address the actual points)

no need to reply to me TT until you c/p all your post in one thread so we can bask in your "genuis"...
Concerned

Bennington, VT

#407 Feb 4, 2011
jgadsden wrote:
<quoted text>
aren't you tired of this troll yet?
I thought you answered him fully many posts ago when you said Wiki is a good source for SOURCES...
I think wiki does provide a good first source and one that avoids the claims of bias...(which is what TT was say about ANY other source you quoted...otherwise he would finally have to address the actual points)
no need to reply to me TT until you c/p all your post in one thread so we can bask in your "genuis"...
In some ways I do get tired of TT's knee jerk actions-but it is interesting to make them dig themselves deeper. People like TT have no knowledge of anything of substance and as I noted, tries and seriously fails to jerk others chains. What a pathetic little fool TT is, as others have noted. People like TT do not have the cojones to say the things they do in the real world-these forums give them the opportunity to try to make themselves superior to others-again TT seriously fails in that department too.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 20
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Vermont Government Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ex.-Gov. Douglas' memoir tackles gay marriage veto Sep 2 Sir Andrew 2
Ex-Gov. Douglas' memoir tackles gay marriage veto Sep 1 nhjeff 2
Gay marriage fight returns (Apr '09) Aug 21 carlina 76
Doug Racine out at Vermont Agency of Human Serv... Aug '14 Anne O Toole 2
Smoking around children becoming illegal Aug '14 Ho Lee Chyt 5
Vt. to ban smoking in all hotels and motels Jul '14 BOO EFFIN WHO 7
Police Log Jul '14 If Sheeple Would ... 6
•••

Vermont Government People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••