Why your religion has nothing to do with abortion: One outraged Virginian's perspective

[Bitner]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
What about doubting thomas? Explain then.

Again, with every post you prove you know nothing about the bible.

[Largelanguage]

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:

<quoted text>
Where exactly does the bible discuss abortion and deem it wrong? How exactly is abortion wrong "scientifically"? Morals are cultural and subjective not universal.

No, morals mean what is right or wrong. Just because you think something is right doesn't make it right.

[Largelanguage]

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:

<quoted text>
Prove it.

You haven't read it yourself, so shut up.

[Largelanguage]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, with every post you prove you know nothing about the bible.

Explain then, go on. Have nothing to say?

[Bitner]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Explain then, go on. Have nothing to say?

I said what I had to say.

Faith is about believing without proof. I gave the example of Doubting Thomas.

YOU are the one who claims that the bible defines faith differently, and yet you can't even give an example from the bible.

You're a fraud. Stop deflecting, and give some sort of proof of your claims.

[Largelanguage]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
I said what I had to say.
Faith is about believing without proof. I gave the example of Doubting Thomas.
YOU are the one who claims that the bible defines faith differently, and yet you can't even give an example from the bible.
You're a fraud. Stop deflecting, and give some sort of proof of your claims.

Explain about doubting thomas. Actually the translation when it says "faith is sure about which we cannot see", in the greek it is supposed to actually be "faith is the substance which we cannot see". You must love losing.

[Bitner]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Explain about doubting thomas. Actually the translation when it says "faith is sure about which we cannot see", in the greek it is supposed to actually be "faith is the substance which we cannot see". You must love losing.

I haven't lost a thing. You have, you've lost any credibility you still had here.

Don't you already know the story of Doubting Thomas?

Again, you prove you DON'T know the bible.

[Largelanguage]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
I haven't lost a thing. You have, you've lost any credibility you still had here.
Don't you already know the story of Doubting Thomas?
Again, you prove you DON'T know the bible.

I know the story of doubting thomas, but it has nothing to do with it. Go on explain.

[Bitner]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
I know the story of doubting thomas, but it has nothing to do with it. Go on explain.

Obviously, you don't, or you would know that it has EVERYTHING to do with the meaning of faith.

Stop deflecting from the fact that you have failed to offer one shred of proof for ANY of your claims.

[Largelanguage]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Obviously, you don't, or you would know that it has EVERYTHING to do with the meaning of faith.
Stop deflecting from the fact that you have failed to offer one shred of proof for ANY of your claims.

Can't back up your claims then in that case?

[Bitner]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Can't back up your claims then in that case?

I already did. It's YOU who can't. You never can, you never have, and we both know you won't now. You'll just keep dancing around it, and trying to pretend it's me who has not.

You're a fraud.

[Largelanguage]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
I already did. It's YOU who can't. You never can, you never have, and we both know you won't now. You'll just keep dancing around it, and trying to pretend it's me who has not.
You're a fraud.

What is doubting Thomas anything to do with it fool?

[Bitner]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
What is doubting Thomas anything to do with it fool?

Everything. Thank you, though, for proving you don't know the bible.

[Largelanguage]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Everything. Thank you, though, for proving you don't know the bible.

Nothing. Thank you, though, for proving you can't bring forth your point.

[Bitner]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing. Thank you, though, for proving you can't bring forth your point.

Of course I did. It's not MY fault you're not familiar with the bible, and the story of Doubting Thomas.

[Largelanguage]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course I did. It's not MY fault you're not familiar with the bible, and the story of Doubting Thomas.

No matter how unfamilar I am, you are still supposed to explain how. Go on, explain. "cock crows" with the doubting thomas story. I've read it before idiot.

[Bitner]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
No matter how unfamilar I am, you are still supposed to explain how. Go on, explain. "cock crows" with the doubting thomas story. I've read it before idiot.

Quite obviously you have not, given all your posts on it.

You're just deflecting from the fact that you can't even point to a place in the bible that proves your contention.

You're fooling no one.

[Largelanguage]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Quite obviously you have not, given all your posts on it.
You're just deflecting from the fact that you can't even point to a place in the bible that proves your contention.
You're fooling no one.

Come on then, explain what doubting thomas says then. Go on.

[Bitner]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Come on then, explain what doubting thomas says then. Go on.

Why? Don't you already know the story? Why should I have to explain something from the bible to someone who claims to be PROVING things from the bible?

Where is YOUR claim proven in the bible. I guarantee you that I could find the reference, if you just gave one. Stop deflecting, and prove just ONE claim. Just one.

[Largelanguage]

Bitner wrote:

<quoted text>
Why? Don't you already know the story? Why should I have to explain something from the bible to someone who claims to be PROVING things from the bible?
Where is YOUR claim proven in the bible. I guarantee you that I could find the reference, if you just gave one. Stop deflecting, and prove just ONE claim. Just one.

I know the story already. "Cock crowd", remember that from the story of doubting thomas? Now explain, since I don't understand. Stop talking in riddles and actually explain yourself.