Anti-choice forces are relentless. Like it or not, so must their foes be

Feb 27, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Daily Kos

Virginia State Sen. Janet Howell wanted to amend a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound bill by requiring rectal exams and cardiac stress tests before allowing prescriptions for erectile dysfunction medication.

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of1,192
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Anti-choice forces

Mumbai, India

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 28, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

I do thank you for your supreme dedication in wanting to help people with this problem, and appreciate your efforts in giving information on this illness.
heh

Charlottesville, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Feb 28, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Seems reasonable.
JTM

Charlottesville, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Feb 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Its a guess on my part, but I'd imagine that a doctor prescribing these medicines would already order the necessary tests. If there is a medical necessity for an ultrasound, why not require it? One of the more legitimate claims about abortion clinics is that they perform major medical procedures without the usual oversite required of other medical providers. Senator Howell is just trying to be outrageous to garner attention. Seems to me that both sides are so caught up in their rhetoric that they seem to over look the obvious.
pbfa

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 29, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

4

JTM wrote:
Its a guess on my part, but I'd imagine that a doctor prescribing these medicines would already order the necessary tests. If there is a medical necessity for an ultrasound, why not require it? One of the more legitimate claims about abortion clinics is that they perform major medical procedures without the usual oversite required of other medical providers. Senator Howell is just trying to be outrageous to garner attention. Seems to me that both sides are so caught up in their rhetoric that they seem to over look the obvious.
What nonsense. If an ultrasound is medically required, of course the doctor will provide it/ There is no justification for ordering it (& making a woman pay for it) if it is not, in fact, medically necessary.

Since: Jul 07

Newport News, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Feb 29, 2012
 

Judged:

5

3

3

here is where "choice" ultimately ends up:

"[an article]published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.

The journal’s editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article's authors had received death threats since publishing the article. He said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”.

ha! a liberal society...
Jorja

Lyndhurst, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

1

Pro-choice is the only way to be. Where is the logic in taking away a person's right to make a choice? Not necessary to agree with the choices made by others but that shouldn't mean you take away their right to choose.

Since: Jul 07

Newport News, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Jorja wrote:
Pro-choice is the only way to be. Where is the logic in taking away a person's right to make a choice? Not necessary to agree with the choices made by others but that shouldn't mean you take away their right to choose.
generally speaking i am for less government in our lives. but what if people's choices involve killing people. molesting children. having sex with animals. we take away many choice for people in society, and rightly so.
Jorja

Lyndhurst, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

4

2

1

GoodNewz wrote:
<quoted text>
generally speaking i am for less government in our lives. but what if people's choices involve killing people. molesting children. having sex with animals. we take away many choice for people in society, and rightly so.
The article doesn't address your list - nor do I. Your list possibly involves "behavior issues" and not necessarily pro choice.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

6

5

5

JTM wrote:
Its a guess on my part, but I'd imagine that a doctor prescribing these medicines would already order the necessary tests. If there is a medical necessity for an ultrasound, why not require it?
There ISN'T any medical necessity. That's the entire reason people are against this nonsense.

The only purpose of requiring the procedure is to make women who want an abortion extremely uncomfortable.

Since: Jul 07

Newport News, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

8

6

4

The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
There ISN'T any medical necessity. That's the entire reason people are against this nonsense.
The only purpose of requiring the procedure is to make women who want an abortion extremely uncomfortable.
or perhaps to force them to think about the life they are flushing down the toilet...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

5

4

GoodNewz wrote:
<quoted text>
or perhaps to force them to think about the life they are flushing down the toilet...
Pro-life lawmakers have already added things like "Woman must watch a prolife video and read prolife reading materials, then wait 24 hours".

You can pretend THAT has something to do with information (though it really doesn't).

You can't pretend that forcing a woman to get an extremely invasive and totally unnecessary procedure is anything but trying to punish the woman for her choice.

Imagine if a man wanted a prescription for Viagra and a new law was added that said once he goes to the doctor, he must take a trial dose and then have sex with a painfully rough robotic hand to test if he's "sure he really wants it". Would that be reasonable?
Jorja

Lyndhurst, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

3

1

1

GoodNewz wrote:
<quoted text>
or perhaps to force them to think about the life they are flushing down the toilet...
There already is thought process - it doesn't need to be forced.
Don't think for a moment it's a snap decision - it isn't!
Ink

Bensalem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

pbfa wrote:
<quoted text>
What nonsense. If an ultrasound is medically required, of course the doctor will provide it/ There is no justification for ordering it (& making a woman pay for it) if it is not, in fact, medically necessary.
Ultra sounds are done all the time for non medical reasons like to find the sex of the child.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

3

GoodNewz wrote:
<quoted text>
or perhaps to force them to think about the life they are flushing down the toilet...
That is the reason and many choose not to destroy their child when they see it. Many young women who have not had a child don't realize that it is a real person and they can't do it. Not everyone who has an abortion has thought it out carefully.
Jorja

Lyndhurst, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

6

5

4

Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Ultra sounds are done all the time for non medical reasons like to find the sex of the child.
That is a "choice" by the woman/parents - it is NOT mandated or forced.
Jorja

Lyndhurst, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the reason and many choose not to destroy their child when they see it. Many young women who have not had a child don't realize that it is a real person and they can't do it. Not everyone who has an abortion has thought it out carefully.
Fetus - not child.
You are mistaken - an abortion IS thought out carefully by everyone involved, the mother, the father and the doctor.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Jorja wrote:
<quoted text>
Fetus - not child.
You are mistaken - an abortion IS thought out carefully by everyone involved, the mother, the father and the doctor.
Then why do so many women suffer with remorse and guilt after the abortion and for years later?
Ink

Bensalem, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Here's a link

http://www.prochoice.com/abortion_safe08.html

Since: Jul 07

Newport News, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
May 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jorja wrote:
<quoted text>
Fetus - not child.
You are mistaken - an abortion IS thought out carefully by everyone involved, the mother, the father and the doctor.
carefully thought out by everyone involved. wow. that is interesting, considering half of the fathers are already out of the picture.
Jorja

Lyndhurst, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
May 8, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why do so many women suffer with remorse and guilt after the abortion and for years later?
It is a difficult decision to make - and of course emotions are involved. Sometimes tough decisions need to be made and women deserve the right to make their own choices..period. We don't need anyone telling us what we can or can not do regarding our own health care issues.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 20 of1,192
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••