Texas Clinics Close as Governor Signs...

Texas Clinics Close as Governor Signs Pro-Life Bill

There are 8 comments on the Illinoisreview story from Jul 21, 2013, titled Texas Clinics Close as Governor Signs Pro-Life Bill. In it, Illinoisreview reports that:

All posts, comments and statements made on IR are those of the authors only. Any disputes must be addressed to the writers, who are solely responsible for their posts, comments and statements.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Illinoisreview.

Yipee

Omaha, NE

#1 Jul 21, 2013
Good!!!!!

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#2 Jul 21, 2013
I see the anti choicers have already been here
pro life

Fort Worth, TX

#3 Jul 23, 2013
yay!!!!!!!!!! all for the babies!!!!!!!!! its simple ladies, if you dont want a baby, close your legs!!!!!!!

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#4 Jul 23, 2013
"pro life"
yay!!!!!!!!!! all for the babies!!!!!!!!! its simple ladies, if you dont want a baby, close your legs!!!!!!!

anti choicer speak for "I can't get laid,so no one else should either"

“Pet me or I'll bite you”

Since: Jul 07

Richardson, Texas

#5 Jul 23, 2013
Still baffles me that when a bill insists on a higher level of standard for womens' medical care, it's lambasted as "against women" by the abortion supporters. Seems at least that part would have been a welcome choice; to upgrade to current modern medical facilities.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#6 Jul 23, 2013
I don't understand why abortion rights supporters, after decades of "it's the law, tough sh*t" rejoinders to any opposition to the practice, NOW all of sudden complain about "the law".

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#7 Jul 23, 2013
MJayM wrote:
Still baffles me that when a bill insists on a higher level of standard for womens' medical care, it's lambasted as "against women" by the abortion supporters. Seems at least that part would have been a welcome choice; to upgrade to current modern medical facilities.
Perry, in his speech when he signed it, proved that it had nothing to do with women's safety, but with closing clinics. Those regulations weren't necessary for safety sake. THAT is why it is lambasted.
LineDazzle

Hawarden, UK

#8 Jul 25, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Perry, in his speech when he signed it, proved that it had nothing to do with women's safety, but with closing clinics. Those regulations weren't necessary for safety sake. THAT is why it is lambasted.
Don't try to copy a man's deep voice, lesbian.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Texas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Mothra 58,792
News North Carolina fight over transgender rights, b... 14 hr Liberte 20
News Republican John Boehner calls Ted Cruz 'Lucifer... 17 hr Big Al 12
News Police: Woman did 'topless handstand' Fri MeSo 2
No White Male Privilege in Texas Fri Mark Rosenkranz 2
News Five Hurt As Tornados Rip Through Grayson County Apr 27 Reichsfuhrer von ... 2
News Fool Me Once, Shame on You (May '06) Apr 27 Truth 10
More from around the web