Norway climate study sparks debate over global warming urgency

[SoE]

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>So commander of pointing out grammar and spelling errors you are in error. Spell check grammar check not working for you today? The end result is that when you assume you make an ASSumption of your--self. Would it be safe to say that you do have a fixed present time orientation based on your belief of scientific science fiction? Do tell all.

Oh oh have i made spelling and grammar errors ?
Well, that won't help Cern will it ...
Considering the fact i've made those errors i guess you will have to assist Cern...
........
Would it be safe to say that you do have a fixed present time orientation based on your belief of scientific science fiction?
........
No

[PHD]

SoE wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh oh have i made spelling and grammar errors ?
Well, that won't help Cern will it ...
Considering the fact i've made those errors i guess you will have to assist Cern...
........
Would it be safe to say that you do have a fixed present time orientation based on your belief of scientific science fiction?
........
No

You certianly did olie. I would beg to differ you certainly do.

[SoE]

Niels , it's Niels....
and i don't find your grasp of elementary
physics bohring

[PHD]

You actually don't find anything but an empty cahir olie.

[SoE]

PHD wrote:

You actually don't find anything but an empty cahir olie.

You are CORRECT madam...

[PHD]

SoE wrote:

<quoted text>
You are CORRECT madam...

Story of your life an empty chair Ollie. Now research REAL SCIENCE instead of that scientific science fiction to fill your empty chair.

[SoE]

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>Story of your life an empty chair Ollie. Now research REAL SCIENCE instead of that scientific science fiction to fill your empty chair.

Hahahaha
Wouldn't the above fall within the category of assumption?......remember?
I must admit I fail to see your point....then again we are not face to face...:-)

Scientific content to follow ?

[PHD]

SoE wrote:

<quoted text>
Hahahaha
Wouldn't the above fall within the category of assumption?......remember?
I must admit I fail to see your point....then again we are not face to face...:-)
Scientific content to follow ?

You fail to see all the points face to face or not.

[Eloteman]

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>You fail to see all the points face to face or not.

Maybe

[PHD]

Eloteman wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe

Maybe not.

[SoE]

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>You fail to see all the points face to face or not.

If you will read ,once again, the post you will see my only concern at that juncture was yours...

It's my belief that, just as surely as one would view the magnificant peaks of the trollian aps in the cold crisp air,
were we face to face... your point would shine forth with blinding clarity...
......
I suppose you could list the operators i am not "seeing"...please organize them in an order that leads in a end direction, that would certainly enhance comprehension...
Of course as you stated before perhaps it's none of my concern ?:-)

[PHD]

SoE wrote:

<quoted text>
If you will read ,once again, the post you will see my only concern at that juncture was yours...
It's my belief that, just as surely as one would view the magnificant peaks of the trollian aps in the cold crisp air,
were we face to face... your point would shine forth with blinding clarity...
......
I suppose you could list the operators i am not "seeing"...please organize them in an order that leads in a end direction, that would certainly enhance comprehension...
Of course as you stated before perhaps it's none of my concern ?:-)

Not any of your concern. If you have a real concern can the semantic gymnastics and explain…

[Eloteman]

Ouch

[Kyle]

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>You wouldn’t recognize it if it slapped you on that sloping pinhead. Now show all your intelligence with your peer reviewed published work.

Now that you meantion it - how much peer reviewed science is there that backs the AGW denier worldview? Hmmmm?

[Eloteman]

Not much

[SpaceBlues]

Eloteman wrote:

Not much

Hardly. I don't know any, do you?

[SpaceBlues]

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>You fail to see all the points face to face or not.

Response:

Eloteman wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe

Back to the troll:

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>Maybe not.

So the troll changed its own message without knowing.

LOL.

[SoE]

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>Response:
<quoted text>Back to the troll:
<quoted text>So the troll changed its own message without knowing.
LOL.

hahaha
I was waiting for someone to pickup on that...
I have to limit my posts. Apparently my language has become arcane .
Out of favor at any rate

[litesong]

SpaceBlues wrote:

So the troll changed its own message without knowing.

Since 'phud fetid feces face fiend' has no message, he can change it, without knowing.

Now that's funny!

[Eloteman]

Oh so funny