Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 60019 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48190 Jun 23, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Then how is it liberal to call skeptics of climate change mitigation, "deniers"? You only WISH you were liberal.
I accept that you are a denier and a troll.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48191 Jun 23, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>you seem hell bent on denying others of your first sentence. you never laugh at yourself and always take yourself too seriously.....so what would you know about the second statement.
here......little liggy.....here....little liggy.
claim you support your hypocrisy.....or admit you're just full of chyt.
Woo Hoo! I got news, you ain't funny. Stupid is not funny.

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#48192 Jun 23, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Cu'n paste spam.
Christopher Booker and Steve Goddard are idiots, high priests of the cult of stupid.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/...
Of course they are. Just like everyone who rejects Islam is an infidel, deserving a gruesome death.
SpaceBlues

United States

#48193 Jun 23, 2014
mdbuilder wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they are. Just like everyone who rejects Islam is an infidel, deserving a gruesome death.
Liar.. Have you converted yet?

Keating says he is more than willing to pay the money [10K] but doesn't believe it will happen, "I'm a scientist and I have to go where the science leads me. I have been studying climate change for a long time and I am certain my money is safe. They are in the business of denial and deception, not science. But, if someone could give me a scientific proof global warming isn't real, it would be worth the money."

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#48194 Jun 23, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
And here is the rest of the story.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/201...
The "rest of the story" was from FORMER administrators or Grant Seekers.
The current ones are shooting O'Bama down there hause
Donnie

United States

#48195 Jun 23, 2014
by James Delingpole and Kit Eastwood 23 Jun 2014, 5:12 AM PDT 83 post a comment

Scientists at two of the world’s leading climate centres - NASA and NOAA - have been caught out manipulating temperature data to overstate the extent of the 20th century "global warming".

The evidence of their tinkering can clearly be seen at Real Science, where blogger Steven Goddard has posted a series of graphs which show "climate change" before and after the adjustments.

When the raw data is used, there is little if any evidence of global warming and some evidence of global cooling. However, once the data has been adjusted - ie fabricated by computer models - 20th century 'global warming' suddenly looks much more dramatic.

This is especially noticeable on the US temperature records. Before 2000, it was generally accepted - even by climate activists like NASA's James Hansen - that the hottest decade in the US was the 1930s.

As Hansen himself said in a 1989 report:

In the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country.

continued:
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#48197 Jun 23, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Cu'n paste spam.
Christopher Booker and Steve Goddard are idiots, high priests of the cult of stupid.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/...
And....?

Were not temperature records altered as he claims?

(get some popcorn folks... the ensuing fiction as answer will make this a fun show)
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#48198 Jun 23, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
Were temperature records altered as claimed, or not?

Jiffy Pop sounds good right about now.. watching that expanding gas if fun.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48199 Jun 23, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
History has shown the ignorant that man is capable of destroying his environment no matter how big it is. Man can pollute river systems, strip land bare of all living things, over fish the oceans, bring species to extinction. Yet somehow man is given a free pass on the Air, how do you figure that Einstein ? Just what makes the atmosphere invulnerable to man's presence.
Why are they all wearing breathing masks in some of those cities in China buried in Smog, what if the US ignored science on exhaust emissions on cars. They would be wearing those same masks in LA & NY by now.
That's your big dilemma instead of posting BS day after day. Show us how science got this one so wrong. Besides knowing that you are drowning in facts that you ignore daily.
co2 has nothing (zero) to do with smog/air pollution in bejing.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48200 Jun 23, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>boring
maybe, but it's accurate.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48201 Jun 23, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Woo Hoo! I got news, you ain't funny. Stupid is not funny.
thanks for your emotional concession.
SpaceBlues

United States

#48202 Jun 23, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>thanks for your emotional concession.
boring

FAIL

again

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48203 Jun 23, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>boring
FAIL
again
you don't have to read my posts, mullet.

you don't have to respond either, dog pecker gnat!

but you have no self control it seems.

poor little wedge.
Sexy Cali Girl

Corona Del Mar, CA

#48204 Jun 23, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
History has shown the ignorant that man is capable of destroying his environment no matter how big it is. Man can pollute river systems, strip land bare of all living things, over fish the oceans, bring species to extinction. Yet somehow man is given a free pass on the Air, how do you figure that Einstein ? Just what makes the atmosphere invulnerable to man's presence.
Why are they all wearing breathing masks in some of those cities in China buried in Smog, what if the US ignored science on exhaust emissions on cars. They would be wearing those same masks in LA & NY by now.
That's your big dilemma instead of posting BS day after day. Show us how science got this one so wrong. Besides knowing that you are drowning in facts that you ignore daily.
Do your part. No cars, air conditioning or computers today. We can do it if we all pitch in! You can do it!
Donnie

United States

#48205 Jun 23, 2014


By Emily Gosden, Energy Editor

2:59PM BST 23 Jun 2014

One of Greenpeace’s most senior executives commutes 250 miles to work by plane, despite the environmental group’s campaign to curb air travel, it has emerged.

Pascal Husting, Greenpeace International’s international programme director, said he began "commuting between Luxembourg and Amsterdam" when he took the job in 2012 and currently made the round trip about twice a month.

The flights, at 250 euros for a round trip, are funded by Greenpeace, despite its campaign to curb "the growth in aviation", which it says "is ruining our chances of stopping dangerous climate change”.

One Greenpeace volunteer on Monday described Mr Husting's travel arrangements as "almost unbelievable".

Another said they were cancelling their payments to support Greenpeace in the wake of the disclosure and series of other damaging revelations of of disarray and financial mismanagement at the organisation, in documents leaked to the Guardian newspaper.
Mothra

Tempe, AZ

#48206 Jun 23, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>you don't have to read my posts, mullet.
you don't have to respond either, dog pecker gnat!
but you have no self control it seems.
poor little wedge.
Agreed.

Spaceballs 'could' do his part to save the planet but shutting down his computer, but he can't.

As could the other warmists... but it they'd rather destroy the planet with more CO2 than actually save it, that is according to themselves.

Phonies... the lot of them.
SpaceBlues

United States

#48207 Jun 23, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>you don't have to read my posts, mullet.
you don't have to respond either, dog pecker gnat!
but you have no self control it seems.
poor little wedge.
FAIL

Read my posts at the other thread.

BAWAWAhahahahaha

Depressed, idiot?

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#48208 Jun 23, 2014
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
And....?
Were not temperature records altered as he claims?
(get some popcorn folks... the ensuing fiction as answer will make this a fun show)
Of course they wete.

To correct for the fact that the time of observation was changed from a warm time of day to a cool one.

Are you going to argue that that correction should not have been made?

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#48209 Jun 23, 2014
Donnie wrote:
by James Delingpole and Kit Eastwood 23 Jun 2014, 5:12 AM PDT 83 post a comment
Scientists at two of the world’s leading climate centres - NASA and NOAA - have been caught out manipulating temperature data to overstate the extent of the 20th century "global warming".
The evidence of their tinkering can clearly be seen at Real Science, where blogger Steven Goddard has posted a series of graphs which show "climate change" before and after the adjustments.
When the raw data is used, there is little if any evidence of global warming and some evidence of global cooling. However, once the data has been adjusted - ie fabricated by computer models - 20th century 'global warming' suddenly looks much more dramatic.
This is especially noticeable on the US temperature records. Before 2000, it was generally accepted - even by climate activists like NASA's James Hansen - that the hottest decade in the US was the 1930s.
As Hansen himself said in a 1989 report:
In the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country.
continued:
Delingpole is another high priest of the cult of stupid.

The correction was for a well documented shift in time of observation from a warm time of day to a cool one.

Is any one of you denier idiots actually going to argue that ignoring this factor gives a more accurate picture of how temperatures have changed?

No, as usual you will run away from any real discussion of the science involved like frightened rabbits, but come back later with more baseless accustions like vicious weasels.
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#48210 Jun 23, 2014
Home»Earth»EnvironmentThe scandal of fiddled global warming data
The US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record

A scene from 'The Day After Tomorrow': in reality, officially approved scientists fudge the data By Christopher Booker
4:04PM BST 21 Jun 2014
Comments
When future generations try to understand how the world got carried away around the end of the 20th century by the panic over global warming, few things will amaze them more than the part played in stoking up the scare by the fiddling of official temperature data. There was already much evidence of this seven years ago, when I was writing my history of the scare, The Real Global Warming Disaster. But now another damning example has been uncovered by Steven Goddard’s US blog Real Science, showing how shamelessly manipulated has been one of the world’s most influential climate records, the graph of US surface temperature records published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Lies, deception, manipulation of data You warmies can't get your agenda through without lying.
You find a bunch of gullible morons and scare the sht out of them. OH GOD THE EARTH WILL END if we don't' do something now.
Your a bunch of pathetic puppets.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Texas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sharyl Attkisson: Homeland Security Mum on U.S.... 59 min tomin cali 1
News Texas Supreme Court sidesteps key home schoolin... 6 hr Paddling has its ... 2
News Neither Candidate Is Getting the Immigration Is... 8 hr Bama Yankee 3
News 'Willie for President:' East Texas artist captu... 16 hr kaye maschino 1
News Julian Castro says he's not being vetted for vi... 17 hr jury 7
News Dallas-area immigrants stung by Supreme Court vote 20 hr guest 5
News Supreme Court divided on Obama immigration plan Thu MeMeMe 2
More from around the web