Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 60662 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#45964 Apr 16, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Ice Age...... Ice Age...... any sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars call out an Ice Age?
Within months of the low amount of Arctic sea ice in 2012, lowest in 32 years, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reported that the Arctic sea ice had "recovered by 60%, & the Arctic was plunging into an ice age. Later, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 50%. Later yet, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 35%. Using proper comparisons AND Arctic sea ice VOLUME, Arctic sea ice VOLUME never was higher than 15% compared to recent years' average. By the end of 2013(remember the year of the returning ice age?), Arctic sea ice VOLUME was only 3% greater than normal recent years.
Presently........
Arctic sea ice VOLUME, as of April 1, 2014 is 1% lower than that of the "2010-to-current" time range. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for April 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~30,200 cubic kilometers. Present April 1, 2014 sea ice VOLUME is ~22,700 cubic kilometers,~7500 cubic kilometers less than the 1980-89 period for April 1.
Ice Age......Ice Age.........
Considerations of Arctic sea ice VOLUME show the uncontrolled plummet of sea ice, desired by unscientific toxic topix AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
stop ranting you little bird murderer!! btw......what kind of degree did you earn to go out and proudly kill starlings with a pellet gun and then stab them with a pocket knife?
also.....where did a physics course come into play with that 'litelong' endeavor?
hmmmm?

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#45965 Apr 17, 2014
DDDD-25 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll make you a bet. I plan to be around for about 20years more. So here's the bet/ If, in 20 years ANY of your propaganda has been proven to be True,with absolute scientific proof, including repeatable experiments that support your dogma as being the truth, I will shoot myself. If, on the other hand none of it comes to fruition, Then you must do likewise to yourself. Don't forget that already the exposed emails of your head scientist have proved to the entire world that you have lived and promoted a LIE. YOUR FRAUD HAS BEEN PLACED AT YOUR DOORSTEP. Better denounce your previous association with your fraudulent, lying politico butt lickers before it's too late. As it stands now , when you grow lod and pass on, and the last shovel of dirt falls on your grave, Nobody will ever speak your name again. So there you have it.
You keep making these stupid statements like prove to me there is a God. It's no different than being in a closed room with someone carrying a highly contagious disease. Would you prefer to be in that room or out of it ? That's the comparison to make, science tells you to sterilize and wear masks in a hospital so no infection is passed on. I don't see any post discrediting any of that science, yet the same science tells you we are affecting the climate and you declare it BS. Why!!!! only because you don't understand it, which means every weather event is replicated in your mind for any given day. It doesn't matter that these disasters only occured 2 or 3 times in your lifetime you want to remember it as thou it was last week. Now as each weather even comes up, you will keep going back 20 yrs, then 10, then 5 then 2 until you come to realize $hit this is not normal and by then it will be too late!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#45966 Apr 17, 2014
Lord Hater wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is a good one.Oxford dictionary. The WEATHER conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period:
our cold, wet climate
SYNONYMS
1.1A region with particular prevailing WEATHER conditions:
vacationing in a warm climate
My 5th grader is not allowed to use Wikipedia for school research or reports.(not reliable)
Pretty much what Wiki said. Here is a scientific definition;
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/noaa-n/clim...

The point being that weather events over a short period are not necessarily a climate event. While the climate has warmed throughout the Earth only a degree or so over a century, weather events can change tens of degrees in a few hours.

Since: Dec 06

Charlie's

#45967 Apr 17, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
I've described the experiment many times, change a variable and measure climate temperature change, then repeat or change until a climate signal is detected from human activity.
You have been describing nothing in practice, not even saying which variable you can change and which range of "climate temperature" measures is significant.
Brian_G wrote:
First, I'd ask for an experiment, unless human activity is too insignificant to climate for measurement.
You want an experiment which obviously change the climate,
Are you crazy ? want it more or less cold ?
We're in your experiment, stupid !
Brian_G wrote:
Wait, that's just what I have been doing in thousands of posts...
You have been repeating stupidities in thousands of posts.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#45968 Apr 17, 2014
DonPanic wrote:
You have been describing nothing in practice, not even saying which variable you can change and which range of "climate temperature" measures is significant. You want an experiment which obviously change the climate, Are you crazy ? want it more or less cold? We're in your experiment, stupid ! You have been repeating stupidities in thousands of posts.
No. we're not in my (or anyone else's) experiment, experiments are purposeful schemes to measurable change one variable then find a change in another variable. There's never been even an experiment measuring a predetermined emission or sequestration of greenhouse gas to or from the air, then measuring a consequent change in global levels.

Maybe we should wait for climate scientists to come up with field experiments before we buy into climate change mitigation?
litesong

Everett, WA

#45969 Apr 17, 2014
ratdownthemiddledownwronggully wrote:
stop ranting
Ice Age...... Ice Age...... any sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars call out an Ice Age?
Within months of the low amount of Arctic sea ice in 2012, lowest in 32 years, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reported that the Arctic sea ice had "recovered by 60%, & the Arctic was plunging into an ice age. Later, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 50%. Later yet, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 35%. Using proper comparisons AND Arctic sea ice VOLUME, Arctic sea ice VOLUME never was higher than 15% compared to recent years' average. By the end of 2013(remember the year of the returning ice age?), Arctic sea ice VOLUME was only 3% greater than normal recent years.
Presently........
Arctic sea ice VOLUME, as of April 1, 2014 is 1% lower than that of the "2010-to-current" time range. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for April 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~30,200 cubic kilometers. Present April 1, 2014 sea ice VOLUME is ~22,700 cubic kilometers,~7500 cubic kilometers less than the 1980-89 period for April 1.
Ice Age......Ice Age.........
Considerations of Arctic sea ice VOLUME show the uncontrolled plummet of sea ice, desired by unscientific toxic topix AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#45970 Apr 17, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Ice Age...... Ice Age...... any sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars call out an Ice Age?
Within months of the low amount of Arctic sea ice in 2012, lowest in 32 years, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reported that the Arctic sea ice had "recovered by 60%, & the Arctic was plunging into an ice age. Later, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 50%. Later yet, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 35%. Using proper comparisons AND Arctic sea ice VOLUME, Arctic sea ice VOLUME never was higher than 15% compared to recent years' average. By the end of 2013(remember the year of the returning ice age?), Arctic sea ice VOLUME was only 3% greater than normal recent years.
Presently........
Arctic sea ice VOLUME, as of April 1, 2014 is 1% lower than that of the "2010-to-current" time range. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for April 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~30,200 cubic kilometers. Present April 1, 2014 sea ice VOLUME is ~22,700 cubic kilometers,~7500 cubic kilometers less than the 1980-89 period for April 1.
Ice Age......Ice Age.........
Considerations of Arctic sea ice VOLUME show the uncontrolled plummet of sea ice, desired by unscientific toxic topix AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
it takes a twisted mind to post the way you do.....and to go on bird killing sprees. did you kill your family cat, too, when you were a child? drown some puppies in your day?
litesong

Everett, WA

#45971 Apr 17, 2014
ratdownthemiddledownwronggully wrote:
.... post the way you do.....
I'm glad you notice.......

Ice Age...... Ice Age...... any sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars call out an Ice Age?
Within months of the low amount of Arctic sea ice in 2012, lowest in 32 years, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reported that the Arctic sea ice had "recovered by 60%, & the Arctic was plunging into an ice age. Later, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 50%. Later yet, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 35%. Using proper comparisons AND Arctic sea ice VOLUME, Arctic sea ice VOLUME never was higher than 15% compared to recent years' average. By the end of 2013(remember the year of the returning ice age?), Arctic sea ice VOLUME was only 3% greater than normal recent years.
Presently........
Arctic sea ice VOLUME, as of April 1, 2014 is 1% lower than that of the "2010-to-current" time range. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for April 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~30,200 cubic kilometers. Present April 1, 2014 sea ice VOLUME is ~22,700 cubic kilometers,~7500 cubic kilometers less than the 1980-89 period for April 1.
Ice Age......Ice Age.........
Considerations of Arctic sea ice VOLUME show the uncontrolled plummet of sea ice, desired by unscientific toxic topix AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#45972 Apr 17, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm glad you notice.......
Ice Age...... Ice Age...... any sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars call out an Ice Age?
Within months of the low amount of Arctic sea ice in 2012, lowest in 32 years, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reported that the Arctic sea ice had "recovered by 60%, & the Arctic was plunging into an ice age. Later, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 50%. Later yet, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 35%. Using proper comparisons AND Arctic sea ice VOLUME, Arctic sea ice VOLUME never was higher than 15% compared to recent years' average. By the end of 2013(remember the year of the returning ice age?), Arctic sea ice VOLUME was only 3% greater than normal recent years.
Presently........
Arctic sea ice VOLUME, as of April 1, 2014 is 1% lower than that of the "2010-to-current" time range. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for April 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~30,200 cubic kilometers. Present April 1, 2014 sea ice VOLUME is ~22,700 cubic kilometers,~7500 cubic kilometers less than the 1980-89 period for April 1.
Ice Age......Ice Age.........
Considerations of Arctic sea ice VOLUME show the uncontrolled plummet of sea ice, desired by unscientific toxic topix AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
do you kill cats and drown puppies the same way you murder innocent birds?
litesong

Everett, WA

#45973 Apr 17, 2014
ratdownthemiddledownwronggully wrote:
...... bird killing sprees.....
Glad you agree that the 15+ invasive bird starlings I killed in one day was notable, as well as the 90+ in less than a year. & it was. Native birds became more numerous & even nested close to my hunting spots, knowing they were protected from the invasive starling. Also, a great increase in the different native bird species was noted. Thank you for your attention.

However, I wasn't as good as some pellet gunners who cleared their lands & lands of their neighbors, of invasive English sparrows by the score & more in a day. Their native birds also returned, even some of the larger really desirable native birds. Major, major improvements!

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#45974 Apr 17, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad you agree that the 15+ invasive bird starlings I killed in one day was notable, as well as the 90+ in less than a year. & it was. Native birds became more numerous & even nested close to my hunting spots, knowing they were protected from the invasive starling. Also, a great increase in the different native bird species was noted. Thank you for your attention.
However, I wasn't as good as some pellet gunners who cleared their lands & lands of their neighbors, of invasive English sparrows by the score & more in a day. Their native birds also returned, even some of the larger really desirable native birds. Major, major improvements!
just like obama....i bet you hate hispanics.
litesong

Everett, WA

#45975 Apr 17, 2014
litesong wrote:
Glad you agree that the 15+ invasive bird starlings I killed in one day was notable, as well as the 90+ in less than a year. & it was. Native birds became more numerous & even nested close to my hunting spots, knowing they were protected from the invasive starling. Also, a great increase in the different native bird species was noted. Thank you for your attention.
However, I wasn't as good as some pellet gunners who cleared their lands & lands of their neighbors, of invasive English sparrows by the score & more in a day. Their native birds also returned, even some of the larger really desirable native birds. Major, major improvements!
//////////
"ratdownthemiddledownwron ggully" gushed:
just like obama....i bet you hate hispanics.
//////////
litesong wrote:
Does President Obama pellet gun shoot, too? You consider hispanics an invasive species? In truth, minorities really have the euros & transplanted euros on the run. But re-pubic-lick-uns haven't figured out, that minorities & women are going to make re-pubic-lick-uns extinct.
DonPanic

Paris, France

#45976 Apr 17, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
No. we're not in my (or anyone else's) experiment, experiments are purposeful schemes to measurable change one variable then find a change in another variable. There's never been even an experiment measuring a predetermined emission or sequestration of greenhouse gas to or from the air, then measuring a consequent change in global levels.
Right now, the only experiment is releasing CO2 and some others GHG and we're in this experiment.
Trapping CO2 other than by biological means would necessitate energy, thus more warming.
Brian_G wrote:
Maybe we should wait for climate scientists to come up with field experiments before we buy into climate change mitigation?
Your so-called field experiment should be at the scale of the planet, maybe you just can't understand that.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#45977 Apr 17, 2014
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
Glad you agree that the 15+ invasive bird starlings I killed in one day was notable, as well as the 90+ in less than a year. & it was. Native birds became more numerous & even nested close to my hunting spots, knowing they were protected from the invasive starling. Also, a great increase in the different native bird species was noted. Thank you for your attention.
However, I wasn't as good as some pellet gunners who cleared their lands & lands of their neighbors, of invasive English sparrows by the score & more in a day. Their native birds also returned, even some of the larger really desirable native birds. Major, major improvements!
//////////
"ratdownthemiddledownwron ggully" gushed:
just like obama....i bet you hate hispanics.
//////////
litesong wrote:
Does President Obama pellet gun shoot, too? You consider hispanics an invasive species? In truth, minorities really have the euros & transplanted euros on the run. But re-pubic-lick-uns haven't figured out, that minorities & women are going to make re-pubic-lick-uns extinct.
good luck making the starling extinct.
why do you murder those who only want to live a good life?
obama has deported more hispanics than any other potus. guess he wants to save the GOP, huh?
limburger cheese sweety

Boonton, NJ

#45978 Apr 17, 2014
KLAATO-BRADA-NIKTO I am SPARKO >>> GLOBALWARMING is A SPACE BOOGIE-MAN plan to ENSLAVE all HUMANS think that GLOBAL WARMING is the REAL THING.THE SMART HUMANS that know GLOBAL WARMING is a SHAM will enjoy PLANET EARTH after the pro-GLOBAL WARMING THINKERS are shipped off to PLANET ORK-NORKITE. it is TIME to FIRE UP THE GRILLand cook up some POLAR--BEAR STEAK'S...

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#45979 Apr 17, 2014
DonPanic wrote:
Right now, the only experiment is releasing CO2 and some others GHG and we're in this experiment. Trapping CO2 other than by biological means would necessitate energy, thus more warming. Your so-called field experiment should be at the scale of the planet, maybe you just can't understand that.
Releasing CO2 ad lib, as you exhale or burn fossil fuel, isn't an experiment. That's just life, experiments are purposeful and controlled.

If you can't manage a field experiment at the scale of the planet, maybe start with a hemisphere or just a continent. You've got to start somewhere; there are no experimental tests of climate change mitigation.
DDDD-25

Corona, CA

#45981 Apr 17, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep making these stupid statements like prove to me there is a God. It's no different than being in a closed room with someone carrying a highly contagious disease. Would you prefer to be in that room or out of it ? That's the comparison to make, science tells you to sterilize and wear masks in a hospital so no infection is passed on. I don't see any post discrediting any of that science, yet the same science tells you we are affecting the climate and you declare it BS. Why!!!! only because you don't understand it, which means every weather event is replicated in your mind for any given day. It doesn't matter that these disasters only occured 2 or 3 times in your lifetime you want to remember it as thou it was last week. Now as each weather even comes up, you will keep going back 20 yrs, then 10, then 5 then 2 until you come to realize $hit this is not normal and by then it will be too late!
I guess you have NEVER watched a news broadcast for 5 minutes in your entire life. How could you not know That your head scientist's emails were hacked and exposed just 3 days prior to the climate summit little more than a year ago..... Do you live under a rock? The headlines in the newspaper read: "climate change fraud exposed"..... The details of the emails showed that the numbers did not support the warming theory, and it also exposed
the truth that they had been "fudging" the numbers to support their failed theory. I'm sorry pal. You are living a lie. Your "science" is not science. The only reason there are any scientists supporting the theory is that about 99% of all the money to support scientific studies is coming from the gov't, And the O'bummer administration wants to push it so they can RAISE YOUR TAXES YOU MORON. If you trust politicos to do what is right and good for the citizens, then you are probably so badly diseased that you can not be helped. My offer to wager still stands. If you take the wager, you WILL lose and you know it. Do something with your life that will not fall the hardest upon the backs of those who truly can not take much more. It is just a tax scam, and you know it.
DDDD-25

Corona, CA

#45982 Apr 17, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm glad you notice.......
Ice Age...... Ice Age...... any sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars call out an Ice Age?
Within months of the low amount of Arctic sea ice in 2012, lowest in 32 years, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reported that the Arctic sea ice had "recovered by 60%, & the Arctic was plunging into an ice age. Later, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 50%. Later yet, sleazy slimy toxic topix AGW denier liars reduced the amount of recovered Arctic sea ice to 35%. Using proper comparisons AND Arctic sea ice VOLUME, Arctic sea ice VOLUME never was higher than 15% compared to recent years' average. By the end of 2013(remember the year of the returning ice age?), Arctic sea ice VOLUME was only 3% greater than normal recent years.
Presently........
Arctic sea ice VOLUME, as of April 1, 2014 is 1% lower than that of the "2010-to-current" time range. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for April 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~30,200 cubic kilometers. Present April 1, 2014 sea ice VOLUME is ~22,700 cubic kilometers,~7500 cubic kilometers less than the 1980-89 period for April 1.
Ice Age......Ice Age.........
Considerations of Arctic sea ice VOLUME show the uncontrolled plummet of sea ice, desired by unscientific toxic topix AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
I've been reading your posts. I bet you are one really cheap 2 bit skank, Eh? You've probably been married 10 times and yet you are probably single again because they all killed themselves. Like lemmings over the cliff, they mate one time then commit mass suicide. Hell, you are so bad, just 1 guy could commit mass suicide as he discovered that he was married 2 you.... HEHE. I bet you could make an onion cry.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#45983 Apr 17, 2014
DDDD-25 wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been reading your posts. I bet you are one really cheap 2 bit skank, Eh? You've probably been married 10 times and yet you are probably single again because they all killed themselves. Like lemmings over the cliff, they mate one time then commit mass suicide. Hell, you are so bad, just 1 guy could commit mass suicide as he discovered that he was married 2 you.... HEHE. I bet you could make an onion cry.
litethong is actually male...albeit with a strong effeminate side.
litesong

Everett, WA

#45984 Apr 17, 2014
litesong wrote:
minorities & women are going to make re-pubic-lick-uns extinct.
//////////
"ratdownthemiddledownwron ggully" gushed:
good luck making the starling extinct.

obama has deported more hispanics than any other potus. guess he wants to save the GOP...
//////////
litesong wrote:
You're more concerned, the starling will go extinct, than the re-pubic-lick-uns. Yeah, lots of people feel the same.

Pres. Obama is catering to the re-pubic--lick-uns, deporting Hispanics. Maybe the re-pubic-lick-uns HAVE figured out, that Hispanics will cause re-pubic-lick-uns to go extinct.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Texas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Character" Cruz: Political Pariah 8 hr Wave Bye Bye Prin... 1
trump must had 11 hr why trump will lose 1
News Texas Dems to DNC: Pick a Castro, Any Castro St... 14 hr kuda 2
News Mexican border agency seen as aiding illegal im... 15 hr o see the light 3
News 18,000 Illegal Aliens Caught in 5 Months - In S... Tue Le mierd 38
News Prescription skin cancer cream Aldara has horri... (Oct '06) Tue Sam 2,152
News Texas Democrats Do a Two-Step Over Voting Right... Jul 25 Captain Yesterday 1
More from around the web