The article is referring to the basic physical processes that determine how much warming will occur over century periods.<quoted text>
So climate models that made less dire predictions are actually more inaccurate than the ones that make more extreme predictions even though none of them are actually right?
This is science?
The sky is falling! And faster than we thought!
Not the processes that determine how much warming will occur over decadal period.
Processes that incidentally the models do capture but not predict well over short periods.
A not so subtle distinction that is obviously invisible to an ignorant lout like you.
Do us favour: go and comment on a subject you do have a clue about.