Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 60675 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

billy hill

Zion, IL

#40810 Oct 25, 2013
Global warming is a united nations ploy to control the world they turn harpp on then all of a sudden boom bad weather if u geniuses new anything about it you would no. read agenda 21 open your eyes they are lying and u believe

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#40811 Oct 25, 2013
billy hill wrote:
Global warming is a united nations ploy to control the world they turn harpp on then all of a sudden boom bad weather if u geniuses new anything about it you would no. read agenda 21 open your eyes they are lying and u believe
Denier mentality at its best.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#40812 Oct 25, 2013
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Denier mentality at its best.
Agree, straight from a tea baggers handbook. Although it seems they have done a search and replace with "commie" substituting "UN"
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#40813 Oct 25, 2013
One denier says we can't influence the weather and then another says all they have to do is flip the switch on the HAARP machine and presto, we change the weather.

As stupid as it gets.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#40815 Oct 25, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
One denier says we can't influence the weather and then another says all they have to do is flip the switch on the HAARP machine and presto, we change the weather.
As stupid as it gets.
And another denier:
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Free your minds. Quit living in delusion.
LOL. Deniers are liars.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#40817 Oct 25, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
jackass
Speaking of yourself.. but who cares? LOL
litesong

Everett, WA

#40818 Oct 25, 2013
motheaten wrote:
"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy....
But MANY say clearly that rich upper crusts redistribute de facto, the world's wealth created by the masses into rich upper crust pockets by force of arms.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#40821 Oct 25, 2013
Mothra wrote:
From Topix' Survey of the Day:
How
d'Oh!
LOL
truth facts

Dayton, OH

#40822 Oct 25, 2013
Mothra wrote:
From Topix' Survey of the Day:
How concerned are you right now about climate change and the environment?
20% Very concerned
14% Somewhat concerned
17% A little concerned
49% Not concerned at all
d'Oh!
Let's break this down 20% liberal quack. 14% wanna be liberal quack. 17% did i leave the camp fire burning. 49% laughing at the quacks.
litesong

Everett, WA

#40823 Oct 25, 2013
motheaten wrote:
From Topix' Survey of the Day:
How concerned are you right now about climate change and the environment?
20% Very concerned
14% Somewhat concerned
17% A little concerned
49% Not concerned at all
Quoting from a re-pubic-lick-un driven survey is precious. re-pubic-lick-un centered(historically & presently) Gannet Corporation owns, in part or wholly, toxic topix.

In best re-pubic-lick-un actions, Wiki states:
In 2011, Gannett was criticized for laying off 700 U.S. employees as a cost-cutting measure after having increased executive salaries and bonuses. Bob Dickey, Gannett's U.S. newspapers division president, was paid $3.4 million in 2010, up from $1.9 million the previous year.
On March 24, 2012, the company announced that it would discipline 25 employees in Wisconsin who had signed the petition to recall (re-pubic-lick-un) Governor Scott Walker, Gov. Walker who used the worst & entirely dictatorial & re-pubic-lick-un strategies to reduce costs by massive lower echelon job cutting, smashing away at unions.
//////////
toxic topix is always floating "SURVEYS", continually showing off their re-pubic-lick-un bias AND OWNERSHIP.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#40824 Oct 25, 2013
So, maybe it's just Australian wildfires that are aggravated by global warming?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/25/...

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#40825 Oct 25, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
How puerile.
What's next, "I'm rubber, you're glue...."?
Jackass.
thanks a lot!
You made my latte spew
Bwaahhaaa
Good one....and spot on(my shirt too).

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#40826 Oct 25, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>you really shouldn't make statements that you can't back up, son.
But then.....you wouldn't be a warmy, would you?
Here's the evidence:

*Both posters appear at the same time.

*They share the same disregard for capital letters at the beggining of a sentence.

*They talk to each other.
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>climate reality? Ok...ok...ok allow me to ask a realistic question.
Which extreme weather events were caused by human co2 and which ones were just good old fashioned natural storms?
heavy tune wrote:
<quoted text>oh 'rite' it is all so easy, just open the global warming handbook to page two. all weather is caused by man, even noah knew that. there is nothing natural about the weather. a tax is all we need.
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>you're not pretending are you? You actually are a total dum fuque !!!
Lol
heavy tune wrote:
<quoted text>that is the best post I've ever read,thank-you. xoxo
heavy tune wrote:
<quoted text>oh my 'caveman', that is funny. every time the wind blows, or it rains, or the sunshines, or it gets cloudy and the wind just doesn't feel right, it is all caused by man. good one 'caveman'. 1,019 lives is not even close to the toll of the titanic, and it was caused by a friggen iceburg. weather isn't changing,'caveman', people are. and that is climate and weather story of the day.
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>lol. Bravo!
*Both posters put quotes aroung other poster's names.
heavy tune wrote:
<quoted text>oh 'kristy'...
heavy tune wrote:
<quoted text>oh but 'facts',...
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>the entire world is lying to you,'kyle'. you really are more stupid than most say.
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>Excellent observation, "fun facts"!!
Two more sock puppets are "worried" and "kal":
worried wrote:
<quoted text>oh but 'brian', we all pay for the 'bad science' of global warming. if I could get funding, I would proove it to you.
kal wrote:
<quoted text>oh but 'fun', in the make believe world of man made global warming, the what ifs and maybe's are totally accepted as fact.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/05/12...

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#40827 Oct 25, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Really? I thought "kal."
Yeah, you were right: heavy tune = kal = worried, and ritedownthemiddle is the sock puppeteer.(See above.)
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#40828 Oct 25, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>thanks a lot!
You made my latte spew
Bwaahhaaa
Good one....and spot on(my shirt too).
karma works for me...

bwahahahahaha
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#40829 Oct 25, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, you were right: heavy tune = kal = worried, and ritedownthemiddle is the sock puppeteer.(See above.)
Nice, merci much...

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#40831 Oct 25, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy.... One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy."
Ottmar Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC Working Group III.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/11/18/ipcc-of...
Free your minds. Quit living in delusion.
Talk about brainwashed, have you ever heard of GLOBALISATION, that's the process that shrunk the middle class redistributing the wealth to the 4%'ers. The so called "trickle down" effect was a myth because all the trickling is done off shore. That more than anything is a single contributor to world wealth redistribution.

Climate policy has to start somewhere and it's not a race where everyone is lined up on the starting line together. It's about developing countries getting a fair deal if they are going to comply to emission standards. That is why the US made a monumental blunder not signing at Kyoto. This allowed China and India to forge ahead unimpeded in any way other than a goal to reduce emissions. As a result stole a huge percentage of business from the west. So climate policy is all about smarts too, it's not just about the weather. When a standard is global, then a factory in the US that makes a clean product could legitimately carbon tax a dirty imported product. The West was already streets ahead of Panda power in that area and now they have the jump on us. They are close behind the starters line, not much of a handicap at all.
So this is the thing deniers don't even think about and that is the huge economical advantage given away by ignorance.
Because sooner or later this will happen, it's one of the certainties in life just like emission standards in cars came about.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#40832 Oct 25, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the evidence:
*Both posters appear at the same time.
*They share the same disregard for capital letters at the beggining of a sentence.
*They talk to each other.
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
*Both posters put quotes aroung other poster's names.
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Two more sock puppets are "worried" and "kal":
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
thats your evidence ?!?!
No wonder you fell for the global warming hoax!
Seek help!

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#40833 Oct 25, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>karma works for me...
bwahahahahaha
yup, that karma thingy bit a little know it all on the ass when the know it all wrongly claimed Mann won a Nobel.
Did your ass get infected, pansy?

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#40834 Oct 25, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, you were right: heavy tune = kal = worried, and ritedownthemiddle is the sock puppeteer.(See above.)
lol
I think you should run with this theory!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Texas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News A rose by another name was Texarkana 2 hr Truth 2
Hello From New York 7 hr Marie 1
News This week marks the anniversary 31st anniversar... Fri ha ha ha 1
News Tesla Gigafactory's promise -- more and cheaper... Thu Solarman 1
News Mexican border agency seen as aiding illegal im... Jul 28 Dee Dee Dee 4
Join the great illuminati in America for Riches... (Feb '15) Jul 28 manwa 10
News Prescription skin cancer cream Aldara has horri... (Oct '06) Jul 28 PictureOfHealth 2,153
More from around the web