Texas educators: teach evolution only

Carlos Estrada wrote:

The national Academy of Science wrote
The modification of DNA through occasional changes of rearrangements in the base sequence underlies the emergence of new traits, and thus of new species, in evolution.(Teaching evolution and the natural science p 15, 1998)
Is the modification of DNA, the one that caused the emergence of the first cell and the creation of all species? I was not there were you there?... because no one of us was there should we not speculate and develop theories, philosophies or believes about how all this thing began? Just because I speculate does this make it not science? Just because my hypothesis is that there is not god? Or there was a god? Does it make it less science?
Of all the different approaches to the existence of the first cell who is wrong or right?
Why should I hinder the thinking and search for answer in the classroom just because they are not congruent with what the majority of us believe?
Science is not independence of philosophy and believes

Science and Theories wrote:

Maybe Christianity shouldn't be taught as fact but as a theory...there are proofs to religion as there are proofs to religion.
They should all be taught as theories not facts, because we don't know.
Also they teach fiction in schools, I don't see why not the Bible.