Ashley Judd for the U.S. Senate?

Ashley Judd for the U.S. Senate?

There are 5 comments on the The Memphis Flyer story from Dec 5, 2012, titled Ashley Judd for the U.S. Senate?. In it, The Memphis Flyer reports that:

In the course of last summer's Democratic convention in Charlotte, the Tennessee delegation was - as its chairman Chip Forrister and others rightly boasted - the most "diverse" in the state's history, up to and including a transgendered delegate.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Memphis Flyer.

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#1 Dec 5, 2012
Will the sheep ever realize that politicians are bad at best without electing those that earn their living by lying, pretending to be someone other than their true self?

Yeah, I throw Reagan into that stew pot too.
Decency

Jackson, TN

#2 Dec 10, 2012
Ashley Judd has the morals of an alley cat!!

She needs to be in church, not politics!

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#3 Dec 10, 2012
Decency wrote:
Ashley Judd has the morals of an alley cat!!
She needs to be in church, not politics!
She may well "need" to be in church, but she has more in common with the politicians.
Ratliff

Orlando, FL

#4 Dec 10, 2012
Bama Yankee wrote:
Will the sheep ever realize that politicians are bad at best without electing those that earn their living by lying, pretending to be someone other than their true self?
Yeah, I throw Reagan into that stew pot too.
GO

F

U

C

K

YOURSELF.

Artists use lies to tell the truth. Politicians use lies to cover it up.

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives
Liberals think they’re more intelligent than conservatives because they are

It is difficult to define a whole school of political ideology precisely, but one may reasonably define liberalism (as opposed to conservatism) in the contemporary United States as the genuine concern for the welfare of genetically unrelated others and the willingness to contribute larger proportions of private resources for the welfare of such others. In the modern political and economic context, this willingness usually translates into paying higher proportions of individual incomes in taxes toward the government and its social welfare programs. Liberals usually support such social welfare programs and higher taxes to finance them, and conservatives usually oppose them.

Defined as such, liberalism is evolutionarily novel. Humans (like other species) are evolutionarily designed to be altruistic toward their genetic kin, their friends and allies, and members of their deme (a group of intermarrying individuals) or ethnic group. They are not designed to be altruistic toward an indefinite number of complete strangers whom they are not likely ever to meet or interact with. This is largely because our ancestors lived in a small band of 50-150 genetically related individuals, and large cities and nations with thousands and millions of people are themselves evolutionarily novel.

The examination of the 10-volume compendium The Encyclopedia of World Cultures, which describes all human cultures known to anthropology (more than 1,500) in great detail, as well as extensive primary ethnographies of traditional societies, reveals that liberalism as defined above is absent in these traditional cultures. While sharing of resources, especially food, is quite common and often mandatory among hunter-gatherer tribes, and while trade with neighboring tribes often takes place, there is no evidence that people in contemporary hunter-gatherer bands freely share resources with members of other tribes.

Because all members of a hunter-gatherer tribe are genetic kin or at the very least friends and allies for life, sharing resources among them does not qualify as an expression of liberalism as defined above. Given its absence in the contemporary hunter-gatherer tribes, which are often used as modern-day analogs of our ancestral life, it may be reasonable to infer that sharing of resources with total strangers that one has never met or is not likely ever to meet – that is, liberalism – was not part of our ancestral life. Liberalism may therefore be evolutionarily novel, and the Hypothesis would predict that more intelligent individuals are more likely than less intelligent individuals to espouse liberalism as a value.

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.
Ratliff

Orlando, FL

#5 Dec 10, 2012
Decency wrote:
Ashley Judd has the morals of an alley cat!!
She needs to be in church, not politics!
Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives
Liberals think they’re more intelligent than conservatives because they are

It is difficult to define a whole school of political ideology precisely, but one may reasonably define liberalism (as opposed to conservatism) in the contemporary United States as the genuine concern for the welfare of genetically unrelated others and the willingness to contribute larger proportions of private resources for the welfare of such others. In the modern political and economic context, this willingness usually translates into paying higher proportions of individual incomes in taxes toward the government and its social welfare programs. Liberals usually support such social welfare programs and higher taxes to finance them, and conservatives usually oppose them.

Defined as such, liberalism is evolutionarily novel. Humans (like other species) are evolutionarily designed to be altruistic toward their genetic kin, their friends and allies, and members of their deme (a group of intermarrying individuals) or ethnic group. They are not designed to be altruistic toward an indefinite number of complete strangers whom they are not likely ever to meet or interact with. This is largely because our ancestors lived in a small band of 50-150 genetically related individuals, and large cities and nations with thousands and millions of people are themselves evolutionarily novel.

The examination of the 10-volume compendium The Encyclopedia of World Cultures, which describes all human cultures known to anthropology (more than 1,500) in great detail, as well as extensive primary ethnographies of traditional societies, reveals that liberalism as defined above is absent in these traditional cultures. While sharing of resources, especially food, is quite common and often mandatory among hunter-gatherer tribes, and while trade with neighboring tribes often takes place, there is no evidence that people in contemporary hunter-gatherer bands freely share resources with members of other tribes.

Because all members of a hunter-gatherer tribe are genetic kin or at the very least friends and allies for life, sharing resources among them does not qualify as an expression of liberalism as defined above. Given its absence in the contemporary hunter-gatherer tribes, which are often used as modern-day analogs of our ancestral life, it may be reasonable to infer that sharing of resources with total strangers that one has never met or is not likely ever to meet – that is, liberalism – was not part of our ancestral life. Liberalism may therefore be evolutionarily novel, and the Hypothesis would predict that more intelligent individuals are more likely than less intelligent individuals to espouse liberalism as a value.

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Tennessee Government Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Mississippi, Tennessee debate future of Confede... 7 hr Ronald 8
News Congressman Under Fire For 'Outlaw Divorce' Rem... (Jul '06) Jun 15 swedenforever 48
News Nelly arrested in Tennessee on drug charges May '15 no doubt 2
News Rapper Nelly Arrested on Felony Drug Charges May '15 no doubt 2
Department of Children's Services (Sep '06) Apr '15 Agitated Mom 226
News Lawsuit Against DHS Could Lead To Reform (Feb '08) Apr '15 kids 70
News Proposed bill could lead to digital driver's li... Mar '15 Ole Skool 3
More from around the web