To put it simply for the stupids on here (i.e. most of you). You have all been arguing over an amendment to the state constitution made in 2007 confirming the age of consent as being 16! Thats right no change in age was made
Not exatly. I would argue that Smith vs State did not trump the Constitution. The Smith case was not based on two consenting partners where one was simply older than the other and the younger being between the ages of 14 and 15.