Miss SC Pageant Gets Its 1st Openly Gay Contestant

Jul 7, 2013 Full story: CBS Local 9

Analouisa Valencia came to the door in a bright blue facial mask and sweatpants, surprised anyone was coming to see her.

Full Story

“Building Better Worlds”

Since: May 13

Europa

#1 Jul 7, 2013
WOW ! She's BEAUTIFUL ! I hope she wins !

:)

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#2 Jul 7, 2013
Europa Report wrote:
WOW ! She's BEAUTIFUL ! I hope she wins !
:)
Her father was a Mexican IMMIGRANT. I guess she must be disqualified, in your book.

When I read her back ground I hugged myself for it is more proof that you are selfish pig.

DNF

“Religious Freedom to Marry”

Since: Apr 07

Newark OH / Baltimore MD

#3 Jul 7, 2013
Europa Report wrote:
WOW ! She's BEAUTIFUL ! I hope she wins !
:)
GASP!

You'd vote for an immigrant?

MY Gosh she's probably even a democrat!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

DNF

“Religious Freedom to Marry”

Since: Apr 07

Newark OH / Baltimore MD

#4 Jul 7, 2013
Hey Curteese. The End might just be near after all!

Fa-Foxy endorsing an immigrant?

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#5 Jul 7, 2013
DNF wrote:
Hey Curteese. The End might just be near after all!
Fa-Foxy endorsing an immigrant?
Who knows what the moron likes? Figuring out his endless changing stream of likes and dislikes would require a PhD in deviant psychology.

DNF

“Religious Freedom to Marry”

Since: Apr 07

Newark OH / Baltimore MD

#6 Jul 7, 2013
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>Who knows what the moron likes? Figuring out his endless changing stream of likes and dislikes would require a PhD in deviant psychology.
Did yopu see where I nailed him on his Bush vs Gore (2000) claim about the right to vote?

Here's my reply from the actual decision!

LMAO!

"The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the electoral college. U. S. Const., Art. II, 1. This is the source for the statement in McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1, 35 (1892), that the state legislature's power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by state legislatures in several States for many years after the framing of our Constitution. Id., at 28-33. History has now favored the voter, and in each of the several States the citizens themselves vote for Presidential electors. When the state legislature vests the right to vote for President in its people, the right to vote as the legislature has prescribed is fundamental; and one source of its fundamental nature lies in the equal weight accorded to each vote and the equal dignity owed to each voter. The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors. See id., at 35 ("`[T]here is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated' ")(quoting S. Rep. No. 395, 43d Cong., 1st Sess., 9 (1874)).

The right to vote is protected in more than the initial allocation of the franchise. Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person's vote over that 105*105 of another. See, e. g., Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, 383 U. S. 663, 665 (1966)("[O]nce the franchise is granted to the electorate, lines may not be drawn which are inconsistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"). It must be remembered that "the right of suffrage can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen's vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise." Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 555 (1964).

There is no difference between the two sides of the present controversy on these basic propositions. Respondents say that the very purpose of vindicating the right to vote justifies the recount procedures now at issue. The question before us, however, is whether the recount procedures the Florida Supreme Court has adopted are consistent with its obligation to avoid arbitrary and disparate treatment of the members of its electorate."

Bush v. Gore, 531 US 98 - Supreme Court 2000
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case...

Since: Sep 10

Earth

#8 Jul 8, 2013
Why are there still "beauty pageants"? Women are not meat for men to drool at.
desnuda

Knoxville, TN

#9 Jul 8, 2013
Did you see her girlfrind? Talk about fat and ugly!

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#10 Jul 8, 2013
desnuda wrote:
Did you see her girlfrind? Talk about fat and ugly!
Did we see your latest lie, your latest false name, for whatever reason? Yes, we did. Lies, lies, lies, all day long.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Carolina Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
s.c. dss a story that must be told!!!! (Jan '06) Nov 21 Angela 770
1st gay marriage licenses issued in South Carolina Nov 20 NorCal Native 26
Couple asks that gay marriages proceed in SC Nov 20 Rainbow Kid with ... 13
Gov. Nikki Haley stirring up India's interest i... Nov 19 Jatt 2
Jimmy dale Maynard (Dec '12) Nov 18 mee 2
Juan Williams: 'Real Racism' Is Liberals' Dismi... Nov 18 Jacory Latimer 8
1st black Union soldiers remembered in DC exhibit (Sep '13) Nov 16 enforce FARA 3

South Carolina People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE