Voter ID law faces scrutiny from feds

Dec 25, 2011 Full story: Hattiesburg American 114

Mississippi officials are confident the state's new voter ID constitutional amendment will pass muster despite the Justice Department's rejection of a similar South Carolina law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls.

Read more
First Prev
of 6
Next Last
BUCKETHAID

Baltimore, MD

#1 Dec 25, 2011
What's the big deal about showing photo ID at the polls? Most people have a driver's license.
BUCKETHAID

Baltimore, MD

#2 Dec 25, 2011
Maybe some folks can't sign their name?
LostForWords

Warrensburg, MO

#3 Dec 25, 2011
Not enough deceased people so they need to be able to vote for those not voting. An age old Democrats phase "vote early, vote often."

“Marble Man”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#4 Dec 25, 2011
We need the voter eligibility laws to be at the highest standard possible.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#5 Dec 25, 2011
I'm working in Germany and my wife has to show a picture ID to vote, it's perfectly normal here in Europe.

The Federal government should be stopping voter fraud, not enabling it.

Since: Jul 10

Yuma, AZ

#6 Dec 25, 2011
Anyone that doesn't want everyone to show ID to vote probably benefits from not having to. This is our right as an American to vote. Then we should all as Americans demand that their be no voter fraud. We are told that our one vote could make the difference. Then we should demand that only those that can vote do as only one vote that is fraud is one to many.

Since: Dec 11

Longwood, FL

#7 Dec 25, 2011
General Robert E Lee wrote:
We need the voter eligibility laws to be at the highest standard possible.
Enforcing laws on minorities infringes on their civil liberties.
BUCKETHAID

Baltimore, MD

#8 Dec 25, 2011
Lots of poor, illiterate people in Mississippi.

I bet there aren't any illiterate people in Germany. Everyone is educated.

USA has more than enough stupid people.:-(

“Marble Man”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#9 Dec 25, 2011
oh Rea11y __ wrote:
<quoted text>Enforcing laws on minorities infringes on their civil liberties.
How so?

“Professor of”

Since: Dec 11

Primatology

#10 Dec 25, 2011
oh Rea11y __ wrote:
<quoted text>Enforcing laws on minorities infringes on their civil liberties.
Heaven forbid! We wouldn't want to inconvenience any minorities by making them produce a *gasp* government issued photo ID.

RA..........CIST!!!!

“Professor of”

Since: Dec 11

Primatology

#11 Dec 25, 2011
My last post was pure sarcasm in case any retards are in here.

Since: Dec 11

Longwood, FL

#12 Dec 25, 2011
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
How so?
Check this out.



See?
Drugs are illegal.
Coloreds believe they have the right to break the law.

“Marble Man”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#13 Dec 25, 2011
oh Rea11y __ wrote:
<quoted text>
Check this out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =LsToFJCrTwwXX
See?
Drugs are illegal.
Coloreds believe they have the right to break the law.
Substitute "democrats" in place of "coloreds". No need for racism.

“Professor of”

Since: Dec 11

Primatology

#14 Dec 25, 2011
oh Rea11y __ wrote:
<quoted text>
Coloreds believe they have the right to break the law.
BUMP!!!

Since: Apr 11

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#15 Dec 25, 2011
The deal is that folks that are ineligible to vote would NEVER vote for a republican, who typically wants to cut them off welfare or deports them or put them in jail for selling crack.

So where does that put us?

It puts us in a place where a highly politicized Justice Department is using its power to try and assure continued political power for the democrat party by suing states that want to clamp down on voter fraud and illegal aliens.

Frankly I believe Eric Holder should be put in prison over this. The audacity of suggesting that requiring a fawking valid ID [that is free for poor people] and every American sounds like a real attempt to subvert The Constitution he is sworn to defend, much like his Mexican drug cartel assault rifle supply program.

“Professor of”

Since: Dec 11

Primatology

#16 Dec 25, 2011
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Substitute "democrats" in place of "coloreds". No need for racism.
Who are you? The censor fairy? He has the right to FOS, just like you. If it's too much for your pansy ass, then turn your fkkn head. And take down your name, you are not worthy of it trash.

Since: Dec 11

Longwood, FL

#17 Dec 25, 2011
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Substitute "democrats" in place of "coloreds". No need for racism.
I didn't see any white folks protesting the drug tests.

Since: Apr 11

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#18 Dec 25, 2011
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Substitute "democrats" in place of "coloreds". No need for racism.
AG Eric Holder is the biggest racist the Justice Department has ever seen. He is also the most corrupt and unethical.

“Marble Man”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#19 Dec 25, 2011
Mr Zaius wrote:
The deal is that folks that are ineligible to vote would NEVER vote for a republican, who typically wants to cut them off welfare or deports them or put them in jail for selling crack.
So where does that put us?
It puts us in a place where a highly politicized Justice Department is using its power to try and assure continued political power for the democrat party by suing states that want to clamp down on voter fraud and illegal aliens.
Frankly I believe Eric Holder should be put in prison over this. The audacity of suggesting that requiring a fawking valid ID [that is free for poor people] and every American sounds like a real attempt to subvert The Constitution he is sworn to defend, much like his Mexican drug cartel assault rifle supply program.
Not supporting, the integrity of voters, and elections, especially from the office of the AG, is nothing short or treason.
LostForWords

Warrensburg, MO

#20 Dec 25, 2011
Ron Paul: Damn It, Don't Ask Bout My Racist Writings.
http://youtu.be/j1uc7x4a8SM

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

South Carolina Government Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News SC state senator refers to candidate as 'raghead' (Jun '10) Mar 24 swedenforever 1,167
News Mark Sanford settles ex-wife trespassing disput... (May '13) Feb '15 swedenforever 74
News Santorum staffing up in South Carolina Jan '15 barefoot2626 4
News Michigan GOP Eyes March 2016 Presidential Primary (Sep '14) Sep '14 Pray4us 1
News Judge: Pistorius can't be found guilty of murder (Sep '14) Sep '14 LOLOL 2
News Rabbi Shmuley Boteach: Tiger's Courageous Confe... (Feb '10) Aug '14 boteach banksters 2
News SC corrections dept. identifies inmates in rap ... (May '14) May '14 Positivep 1
More from around the web