Montana Democrats get Senate candidate

Oct 3, 2013 Full story: WHIO 16

Montana Lt. Gov. John Walsh will run for the U.S. Senate in 2014, his campaign said Thursday, giving Democrats the high-profile candidate they've been scrambling for in a bid to keep the seat they've held for decades.

Full Story
Robert

Douglasville, GA

#2 Oct 3, 2013
This might be one of those Obamacare elections, the majority of citizens in Montana oppose Obamacare and will likely hold it against democratic candidates. By the time we have the election the individuals who can't afford insurance but are not in poverty enough to get the government to give them insurance will have been hit with an Obama fine and will be none too happy over it.
Heywood Jablomee

Warrington, PA

#3 Oct 3, 2013
In Montana only the educated in university towns vote Democratic. The rest of the state is composed of vile uneducated right wing filth. I know because I lived there for 20 years!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#4 Oct 3, 2013
I have faith the Teabagging GOPasaurs will put up another nutjob candidate and lose this seat to the Dems again, just like they did in North Dakota in '12.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#5 Oct 15, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
I have faith the Teabagging GOPasaurs will put up another nutjob candidate and lose this seat to the Dems again, just like they did in North Dakota in '12.
Hey broken record, time for you and your fellow democraps to come up with some new material. Going from one forum to another and repeating the exact same phrase, over and over, makes you democraps look pathetic.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#6 Oct 15, 2013
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>Hey broken record, time for you and your fellow democraps to come up with some new material. Going from one forum to another and repeating the exact same phrase, over and over, makes you democraps look pathetic.
Putting up the same pathetic loser Teabagger candidates over and over election after election makes the GOPasaurs look pathetic.

They threw away the chance to take the Senate in '08,'10, & '12. Now they'll do the same in '14 & '16.

Good little Teabaggers!

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#7 Oct 15, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Putting up the same pathetic loser Teabagger candidates over and over election after election makes the GOPasaurs look pathetic.
They threw away the chance to take the Senate in '08,'10, & '12. Now they'll do the same in '14 & '16.
Good little Teabaggers!
If the Tea Party patriots are losing so bad, then why are you complaining about them so much.

I almost forgot. Left wing democrap wing nuts like yourself aren't happy unless they're complaining about something. What a miserable existence.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#8 Oct 15, 2013
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>If the Tea Party patriots are losing so bad, then why are you complaining about them so much.
I almost forgot. Left wing democrap wing nuts like yourself aren't happy unless they're complaining about something. What a miserable existence.
I simply enjoy pointing out the stupidity of the Teagaggers.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#9 Oct 15, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
I simply enjoy pointing out the stupidity of the Teagaggers.
We're all still waiting for you to point out some stupidity. Your regurgitation of talking points from your anti-American, democrap "news" sources only points out YOUR stupidity, so you lose. But nice try though.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#10 Oct 16, 2013
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>We're all still waiting for you to point out some stupidity. Your regurgitation of talking points from your anti-American, democrap "news" sources only points out YOUR stupidity, so you lose. But nice try though.
Everything ANY Teabagger says is pure stupidity.

Take your pick.
Robert

Douglasville, GA

#11 Oct 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Everything ANY Teabagger says is pure stupidity.
Take your pick.
There is a saying that when you resort to name calling it is a sign that you have no articulable argument to put forth. Is interesting to see the liberals who claim to be against the haters can do nothing but use slurs against the tea party supporters. If you call a gay person a faggot you are a haters but if they call a tea party person concerned we will run out of money a teabagger they are not.
Lamer

Hopkins, MN

#12 Oct 16, 2013
Robert wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a saying that when you resort to name calling it is a sign that you have no articulable argument to put forth. Is interesting to see the liberals who claim to be against the haters can do nothing but use slurs against the tea party supporters. If you call a gay person a faggot you are a haters but if they call a tea party person concerned we will run out of money a teabagger they are not.
tea party used to care about $$ but they have been co opted into a whole other mess of issues that are compeltely outside the scope of what they were orginally founded for. You went from taxes and smaller gov to social issues, health issues, religious issues, ect.

Tea party used to be a bipartisan push even though it was started by the koch brothers but they quickly alienated that partisan group to become just yet another fringe of the republcian party.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#13 Oct 16, 2013
Robert wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a saying that when you resort to name calling it is a sign that you have no articulable argument to put forth. Is interesting to see the liberals who claim to be against the haters can do nothing but use slurs against the tea party supporters. If you call a gay person a faggot you are a haters but if they call a tea party person concerned we will run out of money a teabagger they are not.
It was the Teabaggers who first called themselves Teabaggers.

It wasn't until AFTER they realized that already had another meaning that they abandoned using that moniker.
Robert

Douglasville, GA

#14 Oct 16, 2013
Lamer wrote:
<quoted text>
tea party used to care about $$ but they have been co opted into a whole other mess of issues that are completely outside the scope of what they were originally founded for. You went from taxes and smaller gov to social issues, health issues, religious issues, ect.
Tea party used to be a bipartisan push even though it was started by the koch brothers but they quickly alienated that partisan group to become just yet another fringe of the republcian party.
I would suggest you go to a local tea party meeting, I found nothing of the sort, it was about money and taxes. The reason you think that way is you listen too much to media instead of getting out on your own and observing.

Todays tea party got started the same way the original one did, people getting mad about taxes. In the case of today's tea party it came from an internet newsgroup protesting over the TARP bailout. It was not started by the Koch brothers, the republican party, Sarah Palin, Ron Paul or anyone else you ever heard of. The Tea Party you see on tv is not the same you will see at a meeting.

Go take a look, if you don't like it you can always boo.
Robert

Douglasville, GA

#15 Oct 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
It was the Teabaggers who first called themselves Teabaggers.
It wasn't until AFTER they realized that already had another meaning that they abandoned using that moniker.
If you are going to say it get it right, what they did is make references to sending tea bags to politicians as teabagging. "tea bag the fools in D.C." Referring to sending a tea bag to your representative. There were a few people who did say they were proud to be called teabaggers but nobody really coined the word. These people had no clue to the alternate meaning of teabagging.

Publicly Rachel Maddow of MSNBC was the first make a joke of it which only some people picked up on. Anderson Cooper made a similar crack on CNN.

It was because Cooper backpedaled and said his remark was a stupid, silly, one-line aside, that was not meant to disparage legitimate protests that the light bulb went on. At that point tea party patriots burned up the internet reading wikipedia reading about the alternate definition of teabagging. The few who did quit calling themselves teabaggers but the left poured it on. I guess they did not mind disparaging legitimate protesters. Score a point for Anderson for at least recognizing it. Of course Obama has no problem using it in the media.

Why do you sometimes hear two black people use the N word without triggering the big fight but when a white person with a chip on his shoulder uses it, it is time to get it on and the violence breaks out. The difference is simple, in one of those situations contempt is associated with the use of the word. The same contempt I hear in your voice when you say it.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#16 Oct 16, 2013
Robert wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are going to say it get it right, what they did is make references to sending tea bags to politicians as teabagging. "tea bag the fools in D.C." Referring to sending a tea bag to your representative. There were a few people who did say they were proud to be called teabaggers but nobody really coined the word. These people had no clue to the alternate meaning of teabagging.
Publicly Rachel Maddow of MSNBC was the first make a joke of it which only some people picked up on. Anderson Cooper made a similar crack on CNN.
It was because Cooper backpedaled and said his remark was a stupid, silly, one-line aside, that was not meant to disparage legitimate protests that the light bulb went on. At that point tea party patriots burned up the internet reading wikipedia reading about the alternate definition of teabagging. The few who did quit calling themselves teabaggers but the left poured it on. I guess they did not mind disparaging legitimate protesters. Score a point for Anderson for at least recognizing it. Of course Obama has no problem using it in the media.
Why do you sometimes hear two black people use the N word without triggering the big fight but when a white person with a chip on his shoulder uses it, it is time to get it on and the violence breaks out. The difference is simple, in one of those situations contempt is associated with the use of the word. The same contempt I hear in your voice when you say it.
Right, there're Teabaggers, just like I said.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#17 Oct 20, 2013
Robert wrote:
The reason you think that way is you listen too much to media instead of getting out on your own and observing.
Don't waste your time trying to reason with democraps. They're blinded by hate and are only capable of regurgitating lies spouted by the liberal media. Their brains are mush. Move on to moderates who can still think for themselves.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Montana Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
montucky trashers Tue USA MASTERS 1
Who's got your vote in the Montana Senate race? Tue USA MASTERS 11
Scandal Threatens Montana Democrat's Hold On U.... Tue skunk MThillbillys 45
open them Boarders !!!! Oct 19 Montucky Trasher 15
Ebola Oct 18 we pork hicks 28
state corruption Oct 17 techs spins 1
systematic racism Oct 17 USA Master Techni... 17

Montana People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE