Women can drive in Kansas. The stoning of adulterers is not condoned, nor is removal of the right hand of thieves.Yet the Kansas Legislature overwhelmingly passed and Gov.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Kansas City Star.
#22 Jul 6, 2012
I want multicultural tower of bable Minority Socialism.
Oh. We already have it!
OK. IMPEACH OBAMA NOW
#23 Jul 7, 2012
You also said,“If you want to stop the eed for abortion, then advocate the sterilization of unwed men.”
Those are sexist pig comments as well as being utterly ridiculous.
Yes, you did indeed bring abortion into this thread. Why are you whining about something YOU did?
And like I told you in my first post on this thread, you are simply wrong. It’s not pressure from the “Catholic establishment” that drove the Kansas’ legislature to oppose abortion, it’s the will of the people expressed through their elected representatives. Only sick people like you support slaughtering unborn babies in the most gruesome manner imaginable.
Liar. You’ve spent the entire thread supporting the slaughter of the unborn. As far as morning after pill and other abortifacients, they ARE available. If women want them, they can buy them.
And how much more available do you think abortion can possible be? There are already 1.5 million babies put to death every single year. That's over 4100 every single day. We lament the mass killing of 3000 people on 9/11, yet we ignore the 4100 that get murdered EVERY SINGLE DAY! We talk about the 6 million Jews put to death in WW2, yet ignore the 60 million babies that have been put to death since Roe v Wade.
Government exists to secure the inalienable rights of all, which includes the most basic of all human rights, the right to life.
#24 Jul 7, 2012
Really? So the criteria for protection of life is dependent upon American citizenship? That’s ridiculous. So you advocate repealing all laws against the murder of illegal aliens and foreigners visiting the U.S. on a visa? See how stupid your position is?
It’s not the woman’s arms and legs that are getting torn from her body. It’s not the woman’s skull that is being crushed. An unborn baby has a separate body from its mother. A separate circulatory system, a separate braing, a separate body, different DNA. The “it’s a woman’s body” argument is utterly ridiculous and a complete denial of biological fact.
Here’s another example of you being a sexist pig.
How about this: prosecute abortions as murder, and stop forcing society to pay to raise children produced by irresponsible parents. Make THEM pay for the negative results of their own bad decisions.
The result? Men and women either using contraception or waiting to engage in sexual intercourse until after marriage. Problem solved without murder and without cost to taxpayers.
It’s unreasonable for men and women to use contraception or to not have sex until they are married? Really? Hmm….seemed to work fine for thousands of years before we started slaughtering 1.5 million babies every year as a result of Roe v Wade in 1972.
You can argue all you want, but you’ve got nothing. Abortion is murder. Only mentally sick people support such horrific wickedness. You are among them.
#25 Jul 7, 2012
Correct. The government has no business protecting the unborn.
To believe abortions did not happen before Roe v Wade is sorta stupid.
Unwanted pregnanacies will continue to get terminated.
Just ike they have for thousands of years.
There is a need for abortion, weather you agree with it or not.
I love the you can't have an abortion, but you also don't deserve any assistance while your pregnant platform.
There is no way to end the need for aortion without costing taxpayers money.
Weather I support abortion, or you fight it, they will still happen, and men are to blame. In every case. Not women. Putting the responibility on men is the only way to curb the need.
#26 Jul 7, 2012
Bullshit. Government exists to secure the rights of human beings, including the most important of all human rights, the right to life.
To believe that the effects of Roe v Wade did not include a dramatical and exponential increase in the number of abortions is a wholesale denial of reality.
Here are the facts. In 1960 the total number of all pregnancy-related deaths (from abortions as well as from childbirth and other problems during pregnancy) was 1,579, according to the Vital Statistics of the United States, Vol. II, Mortality, Part A. 1960-77.
In 1968, Vital Statistics reports 859 total pregnancy-related deaths; 133 of the 859 attributed to abortion.
Like I said, you can argue all you want, but you're full of shit. The facts are there for anyone who wants to look at them.
Perhaps, but until the last 50 years or so society rightly rejected such debauchery, and they were very few and far between.
There is never a need to murder another human being, especially so when it's a helpless, innocent little baby.
Right. Murder is the worst of all crimes, and people should be responsible for the costs of their own choices.
Men have no say in whether a woman chooses to murder her own child. Not only is your statement ridiculous, it's further proof of you being a sexist pig.
There's no help for people like you. You're mentally deranged.
#27 Jul 7, 2012
your stats are lovely. But useless.
Out here in th real world, stuff happens, and sometimes somebody else's answer is not your answer.
the simple fact that abortions happen proves they are necessary.
Curbing that number is possible, but only if the situation is greeted with a little less all pissed off about it, and more sympathy for the actually born.
Now it appears we have hijacked this thread on Kansas' stupid stupid sharia law law to have a discussion on the merits of legal abortions.
I'm done. Your way has no answers, only anger and more babies will be unborn. Want a bortion to stop, quit looking at the numbers and the disgusting videos online, and make a difference with real live people who need help working through ife's difficult decisions.
The people who deciede to have abortions, are still people, American people, and they deserve access to every medical option availible for every situation, wheather you are in agreement with their decision or not.
You cannot bully moral behavior into people.
#28 Jul 8, 2012
No they aren't useless. They serve to defeat your ridiculous position. No surprise to me that you dimiss the facts. Sickos like you will go to any lengths attempting to justify your support of the slaughter of babies.
Bullshit. Just because something occurs does not prove its necessity. Women get raped, doesn't mean rape is necessary. People get murdered, doesn't mean murder is necessary.
The actually born aren't getting slaughtered by the millions every single year.
You're the one that brought up abortion. Guess you weren't ready to have your ignorant and stupid claims utterly destroyed.
Of course you are. You have been utterly defeated and shown yourself to be a sicko and a sexist pig.
I gave you answers. You just don't want to hold people accountable for their own decisions. You want to allow them to commit murder or to have taxpayers foot the bill for their sexual escapades.
The right way is to oppose murdering little babies and refuse to force the taxpayers to pay for the consequences of a man and woman engaging in sexual intercourse. They choose to do it, and with that choice comes the responsibility of any results that come from it.
Of course you want to continue to bury the truth. It's easy to claim those little babies are just clumps of tissue, but when you have to actually look at what it is, reality slaps you in the face.
Yes, there are difficult decisions in life. But when society takes away the responsibility for the negative consequences of the choices people make in life, their behavior doesn't change. Our society continuing to slaugther millions of babies every year in the most barbaric and gruesome manner imaginable exacts a very heavy toll. But because you're mentally sick and support it, you're completely oblivious to the massive damage we're causing society.
Yep, and mass murderers are still people too. Doesn't justify what they've done.
Neither do we have to condone it.
Add your comments below
|Former Sikeston resident now sheriff in Christi... (Nov '08)||May 21||GrAUSKarmaStainU||14|
|Obama seeks to end immigration enforcement by l...||May 21||Quirky||4|
|Three found dead in car overturned in creek (Dec '08)||May 11||Jim||6|
|anyone want a free mobile home? (Mar '09)||May 6||walt||20|
|Missouri Senate votes to override veto of welfa...||May 5||see the light||1|
|Missouri Gov. Nixon Refuses to Save Failing Wel...||May 5||James||2|
Find what you want!
Search Missouri Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC