Democratic senator finds House defense bill riddled with earmarks

Dec 11, 2011 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Boston Herald

House Republicans banned earmarks, a top symbol of congressional profligacy, after they won control of the chamber last fall in a wave of voter anger over excessive government spending.

Comments
1 - 2 of 2 Comments Last updated Dec 11, 2011
Doc

Poplar Bluff, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Dec 11, 2011
 
Claire McCaskill should know sneaky political machinations. She needs to be watching her buddy the Obamanation in the Oval Office...!
Tom

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Dec 11, 2011
 
It would be a good idea to introduce all bills without attachments of any kind that do not have anything to with the body of the bill and those attachments that are germaine to the bill must be reviewed by a quorum before attachment. Any violation would render the member attempting to amend unable to introduce any bill for a period of six months.

This would cause greater study of most bills and shorten their time in committees. Anything that may have been attached may be introduced as a seperate bill at any time.

PS Hey Doc, why don't you try sticking to the subject at hand?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••