duh legal kidnapping
Crabman

Snover, MI

#1 Dec 8, 2013
Agree,cause if the birthparent had known what relative adoption code laws mean-then they would of got "separate agreements statement make to get consent signed into writing in first place, Duh. So it was coerion,naive parents whom just wanted ask for school custody, with no lawyer, not ask or offer counselors, no knowledge. Sounds like "legal kidnapping", Judical misconduct ,for not given due process of Laws. Judge Wilis not stickN to subject matter motion. So if the parents were given 710.44 5 (b,d) in first place, none this crab would of happened and child wouldn't of suffered.,later at least should of been given visits between parents and child. In the second change #2 trial. yea -the judges opinion-was crapBS. Opinion are like asholes everyone got one. Therpist needs to be fired. Maybe judge should take his grKids to jail so they can be mentally abused.Afterall he allowed other peoples children to be harm'd.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#2 Dec 8, 2013
Crabman wrote:
Agree,cause if the birthparent had known what relative adoption code laws mean-then they would of got "separate agreements statement make to get consent signed into writing in first place, Duh. So it was coerion,naive parents whom just wanted ask for school custody, with no lawyer, not ask or offer counselors, no knowledge. Sounds like "legal kidnapping", Judical misconduct ,for not given due process of Laws. Judge Wilis not stickN to subject matter motion. So if the parents were given 710.44 5 (b,d) in first place, none this crab would of happened and child wouldn't of suffered.,later at least should of been given visits between parents and child. In the second change #2 trial. yea -the judges opinion-was crapBS. Opinion are like asholes everyone got one. Therpist needs to be fired. Maybe judge should take his grKids to jail so they can be mentally abused.Afterall he allowed other peoples children to be harm'd.
What the hell are you talking about??
Crabman

Snover, MI

#3 Dec 8, 2013
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>What the hell are you talking about??
I know what Iam talking about ,if you don't know -go buy reading glasses. Or is this another Opinion,and you know what the that is like.
Either vote Yes, or No on Is Judge Willis a hypocrite?=criticize others for not acting doing something,but whom don't does acts judges themselves. Have a omg hell of day. No reply is necessary unless you vote. Wonder if Federal Judge would be interested in this case. Or ParentsRights.org . or ChildRights.org .

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#4 Dec 8, 2013
You're talking jibberish. Nobody knows what the hell you're even trying to say. Come back when you figure it out and take some spelling lessons while you're at it. My 3 year old nephew can type better than you can.
Grinch aka judge

Snover, MI

#5 Jan 2, 2014
Ehat the hel?/
So Judge Willis ordered a Jail'd assualt offender to be TRANSFERED from Berrien Co. Jail to his jail in Van Buren Co jail so this guy can have closer family visitation .?
But yet denied the Bithparents of a child victim of same case to have visitation with ther child. Denied fit grandparents to have visitation with child . Ya say birthparents causght t jail offender (out on bail about the child at his mothers house. and that this offenders mother ws caught mentally harm child by police saying "Your not (birthname) over /over till child screams. Judge Willis said-"well jail offenders mother could of changed the childs whole name but didN't. even though birhtparents only signed consent with stements of visitation any time/child name same. Gee wonder why judge willis talks about the jail offenders rights 3 times in court room but yet this guy,it wasnot about him. It was about the protection of child,birthparents rights to protect childs right to visit, and her name. Statements made to get consent of custody. Gee guess Judge willis likes the Jail sex offender better then the child victrim. Then question remains, WHY didN't t judge order birthparents rights to have sessions with child. instead judge more worry about rights of jailed offender??? Why did judge order jail offender to be transfered to have boowho family visits?? but ignored Child Victims crys for visits? and plea motion of birthparents crys - to have visitation with ther child .
But yet ordered the jail sex offender of said child to have sessions with his victim, what t hedoublelLL.
That the Plea motion subject was the birthparents rights of visitation issue tht was on trial that day. wonder why judge willis Secy,RS- help" jail offenders mother 2 hours in a private office but didNot help birthparents no lawyer in 710.44 5 b.d Its her jobs). but its Not her job to give favor private help to jail offenders mother who had a lawyer.

So 3 times the judge chooses a jail offenders rights vs birthparents rights and jail offenders right was not even plea motion to which the judge had to decide?? What t double he ll.
Don't think that judge willis had a right or authority to modify t orders of t first judge. conflict of interests ,favors, jurisdiction of laws.

What the H e double LL // Child protection laws-during an investigation of suspected child abuse or neglected ,the child reported to have been abused or neglected shall not be interviewed in the presence of an individual suspected to have perpetrated the abuse. Well what part of that Law does Judge Willis NOT understand?

Yes vote (b) the birth parents should of had visitation session with the there child. Would be in BEST INTEREST OF CHILD.

and Vote NO on (a) judge Willis should NOT of ordered jail offender and child victim into prIvate sessions , Not needed. NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF CHILD VICTIM-after all the child already had 2 EXPERTs and 4 LSW.
Dragonsword

Sunbury, OH

#6 Oct 23, 2014
Grinch aka judge wrote:
Ehat the hel?/
So Judge Willis ordered a Jail'd assualt offender to be TRANSFERED from Berrien Co. Jail to his jail in Van Buren Co jail so this guy can have closer family visitation .?
But yet denied the Bithparents of a child victim of same case to have visitation with ther child. Denied fit grandparents to have visitation with child . Ya say birthparents causght t jail offender (out on bail about the child at his mothers house. and that this offenders mother ws caught mentally harm child by police saying "Your not (birthname) over /over till child screams. Judge Willis said-"well jail offenders mother could of changed the childs whole name but didN't. even though birhtparents only signed consent with stements of visitation any time/child name same. Gee wonder why judge willis talks about the jail offenders rights 3 times in court room but yet this guy,it wasnot about him. It was about the protection of child,birthparents rights to protect childs right to visit, and her name. Statements made to get consent of custody. Gee guess Judge willis likes the Jail sex offender better then the child victrim. Then question remains, WHY didN't t judge order birthparents rights to have sessions with child. instead judge more worry about rights of jailed offender??? Why did judge order jail offender to be transfered to have boowho family visits?? but ignored Child Victims crys for visits? and plea motion of birthparents crys - to have visitation with ther child .
But yet ordered the jail sex offender of said child to have sessions with his victim, what t hedoublelLL.
That the Plea motion subject was the birthparents rights of visitation issue tht was on trial that day. wonder why judge willis Secy,RS- help" jail offenders mother 2 hours in a private office but didNot help birthparents no lawyer in 710.44 5 b.d Its her jobs). but its Not her job to give favor private help to jail offenders mother who had a lawyer.
So 3 times the judge chooses a jail offenders rights vs birthparents rights and jail offenders right was not even plea motion to which the judge had to decide?? What t double he ll.
Don't think that judge willis had a right or authority to modify t orders of t first judge. conflict of interests ,favors, jurisdiction of laws.
What the H e double LL // Child protection laws-during an investigation of suspected child abuse or neglected ,the child reported to have been abused or neglected shall not be interviewed in the presence of an individual suspected to have perpetrated the abuse. Well what part of that Law does Judge Willis NOT understand?
Yes vote (b) the birth parents should of had visitation session with the there child. Would be in BEST INTEREST OF CHILD.
and Vote NO on (a) judge Willis should NOT of ordered jail offender and child victim into prIvate sessions , Not needed. NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF CHILD VICTIM-after all the child already had 2 EXPERTs and 4 LSW.
Dragonsword reply says- votes (b) and 710.44 5(d) reform t forms birthparents sign. must be ask.
Have you been given Money to sign is not t only question ask that should be on Consent form.
The jailed 1/2 uncle offender gave up his rights when he assaulted said child, thereby he has NO RIGHTS to have therapist with child. Was Not his trial,Judge is misconduct,child endangerment. The jailed sex offender Kris Esmer of said child does not have any rights was not his trial.
The fit naive birthparents trial (motion subject matter of day, was about having visits,statements "separate agreement to get the sign consent. Must be ask-should have by t LAWS 710.44 5 (d),coerion statements,and have a right to counselor sessions.
Judge Motion was unethical misconduct, didn't follow rules of law.
This judge needs to be voted out of office /resign or old fart retire.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michigan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... (Nov '16) 6 hr Chicagoan by Birth 8,858
speakers cabin... booby brunette 10 loving ok o... Jul 18 seewhatboobybrune... 1
News Grievance filed over mowing goats at university... Jul 15 Rick 1
graceland ballroom lupton mi purple gang (Jan '09) Jul 11 Jeff Brodie 125
News Poll: Would you support medical marijuana? (Mar '08) Jul 7 Stephy 26
How many Hells Angels chapters in Michigan? (Oct '12) Jul 6 Sylo 109
News Man dies after being thrown from personal water... Jul 5 cranky 1
More from around the web