Gay Marriage Vote May Come To Michigan In 2016

Jun 11, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: EDGE

With more than half of voters supporting a repeal of Michigan's gay marriage ban, advocates say it's not a matter of if - but when - same-sex marriage is legal in the state.

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 23 of23
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Jun 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Sneaky Pete wrote:
So you're a hypocrite. Ok, thanks!
No, just a person who can count, and understand that three or more is greater than two.
Sneaky Pete wrote:
Hmmmm, and a bit of a bigot too, eh?
Not at all. I don't care how people want to live their lives, but if they want equal protection of the law, what they are seeking must be just that, equal. Polygamy, by definition is not.

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Jun 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lides wrote:
<quoted text>
No, just a person who can count, and understand that three or more is greater than two.
<quoted text>
Not at all. I don't care how people want to live their lives, but if they want equal protection of the law, what they are seeking must be just that, equal. Polygamy, by definition is not.
Him and his buddies need to make a Polygamy thread in the Human Sexuality forum....there it would be a big HIT! LOL

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Jun 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Imprtnrd wrote:
Him and his buddies need to make a Polygamy thread in the Human Sexuality forum....there it would be a big HIT! LOL
That wouldn't fit their pathology. Their posts aren't really in favor of polygamy, they are their child-like attempts to skew the topic, because they lack the mental capacity to make a valid on topic argument. Then again, there really isn't a valid argument against equality.

Even if they did mean to argue for polygamy it doesn't seek equality, but rather greater protection of the law for three or more, which they would understand if they could count to three.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 21 - 23 of23
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••