What the 2012 election taught us

Nov 6, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Washington Post

We've been scouring the data for clues as to what we should learn from what happened tonight as President Obama relatively easily claimed a second term.

Comments
5,361 - 5,380 of 10,324 Comments Last updated Oct 1, 2013

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5982
Jan 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Stoneman wrote:
When gasoline briefly hit $4/gallon you shrieked about how Bush was profiteering (somehow).
Actually, no...

The tea baggers have been shrieking about the cost of gas until we remind them that it was higher under Bush which they deny even after you give them the charts.

Most people understand the POTUS has very little to do with the price of gas, and what little he control he has is at best temporary- a few weeks a nickle or a dime.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5983
Jan 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Stoneman wrote:
And the national debt IS almost double what it was when he ascended, which you don't address.
It isn't but putting that aside: we are paying Bush's bills.

It seems Republicans don't think putting things on the credit card counts (e.g., the Bush war in Iraq).

Chickens/home/roost.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5984
Jan 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Don't you even wonder what the definition is of the words in the material you are being indoctrinated with?
You don't even know what "supply-side economics" is. Evidence of that is your reference to it in this discussion. We have not opened that door yet.
But, you can prepare for that discussion by reading up on economics. For that discussion, I'd suggest adding to any indoctrinated economic knowledge (Keynes) you have with some Thorstein Veblen, Malthus, and a little Nash wouldn't hurt.
You would be equaly ill-qualified to discuss governmental philosophies. I'm thinking you're possibly at the level where you actually think Plato was writing seriously in his First and Second Republics. You couldn't possibly be more advanced than that kindergarten stage.
You still haven't answered the most basic question.
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
So your only recourse is to question my knowledge on the failure of your party following the farce of the trickle down theory...Typical insipid drivel.

As you have clearly demonstrated, your babbling is the same song and dance most neo con Faux news sheep perform...Nothing new.

You are a broken record. Continue to bitch and whine. The money for Obamas program will be there, just like the money for every other president was there for their programs...

Not much left to discuss on that matter.

Would you like to discuss the failure of Voodoo economics? Let's go.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5985
Jan 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Yep, you bought into the whole fantasyland Obama dream teams Money Grows On Trees, and Watermelon hootenanny extravaganza.
Bobblehead.
Stoneman

Boise, ID

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5986
Jan 5, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It isn't but putting that aside: we are paying Bush's bills.
It seems Republicans don't think putting things on the credit card counts (e.g., the Bush war in Iraq).
Chickens/home/roost.
Honestly.

How much longer are you going to blame Bush for our current economic malaise?

I want you to stick around. When Obamacare takes root and the taxes soar, I want to hear your excuses for why we don't have unemployment below 7%.

Funny thing about Socialism. It almost guarantees an unemployment rate of nearly 10%. The French just got used to it. Maybe by the time Lord Obama finishes his second term we'll think 10% is the New Normal.

By the way, I'm flattered that I provoked a 3-response. I must have struck a nerve. Sensitive about the pitiful perfermance by your Lord?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5987
Jan 5, 2013
 
Stoneman wrote:
<quoted text>
Honestly.
How much longer are you going to blame Bush for our current economic malaise?
What malaise?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5988
Jan 5, 2013
 
Stoneman wrote:
When Obamacare takes root and the taxes soar, I want to hear your excuses
I've been waiting for your excuses for the tea bag getting the snot slapped out of them in 2012.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5989
Jan 5, 2013
 
Stoneman wrote:
By the way, I'm flattered that I provoked a 3-response.
Don't be. Think of the seconds it takes me to respond.

Ten?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5990
Jan 5, 2013
 
Stoneman wrote:
I must have struck a nerve.
Or you are just projecting... again.

Think how hard it is to use the scroll button on the mouse...

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5991
Jan 6, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Clearly- you are the one who is confused.
Perhaps you should put more work into passing your GED first, and then work your way into (macro) economics.
Take history first...
Yawn, just another empty attack folks, when loons can't play under the rules they attack. They never win on a level playing field.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5992
Jan 6, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been waiting for your excuses for the tea bag getting the snot slapped out of them in 2012.
Psssssssssst, we control the house, the country didn't trust you loons with the purse. Talk about getting the snot kicked out of you, wow 2010 was that an ass whippen or what? 332 new republicans.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5993
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Bobblehead.
Which is three shades smarter than an empty parasite sucking liberal.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5994
Jan 6, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>You are the one tha obviously does not know what the definition of Marxism is. nothing in the Obama agenda even comes close to marxism. Sorry charlie...
you still hae to show how the US gov't will collapse. did you forget about that in your rantings about off topic issues?
And this coming from a person who can't even define the term "Marxism".
You are so ignorant, you can't even define the term that describes the subject being discussed, right?
How about you give us your understanding of what you think is the definition of "Marxism". You'll have to do something different to do that, though. By design, a concise definition of "Marxism" is never included in the material you are indoctrinated with. All you get in your indoctrination sessions are instructions on tactics to put Marxism into effect.
In short, you wouldn't know a Marxist if one was brainwashing you with a bullhorn in your face.

Or, prove me wrong.
Define "Marxism" for us.

I will grade your definition with quotes from Karl Marx.)))))

... dupe.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5995
Jan 6, 2013
 
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
So your only recourse is to question my knowledge on the failure of your party following the farce of the trickle down theory...Typical insipid drivel.
As you have clearly demonstrated, your babbling is the same song and dance most neo con Faux news sheep perform...Nothing new.
You are a broken record. Continue to bitch and whine. The money for Obamas program will be there, just like the money for every other president was there for their programs...
Not much left to discuss on that matter.
Would you like to discuss the failure of Voodoo economics? Let's go.
Define "trickle down economics"
Define "supply-side economics"

Here's another one for you, define "Marxism"

I'm betting you're so ignorant you can't define any of the above terms. Which means, you wouldn't recognize a Marxist if one was brainwashing you with a bullhorn in your face.

Or, prove me wrong.

Define "Marxism" for all of us here.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5996
Jan 6, 2013
 
Weather will be good today. I'll be taking my white Harley Davidson with the 13 "Punisher" skulls that look exactly like the Willie G Skull with dufus fangs drawn on it for a ride.
But, I'll leave you a note about something else you're completely ignorant of:

As if the clown act in the White House isn't obvious enough, there is a discussion actually happening about minting a coin with Obama's picture on it to pay the debt with.
Can you believe this?
Can you believe those dopes actually think an image of Obama is security for payment of a debt?

The first modern economist was Adam Smith. He described the embrionic stage of development of the modern industrial economy. The principles he stated have never been proven false.
Let's see what Adam Smith has to say about frauds like we have in the White House today:

"By means of those operations (authorizing the coinage of money without the backing of economic securities) the princes and sovereign states which performed them were enabled, in appearance, to pay their debts and to fulfil their engagements with a smaller quantity of silver than would otherwise have been requisite. It was indeed in appearance only; for their creditors were really defrauded of a part of what was due to them. All other debtors in the state were allowed the same privilege, and might pay with the same nominal sum of the new and debased coin whatever they had borrowed in the old.
Such operations, therefore, have always proved favourable to the debtor, and ruinous to the creditor, and have sometimes produced a greater and more universal revolution in the fortunes of private persons, than could have been occasioned by a very great public calamity."

Can you believe those idiots in charge of our economy are so ignorant they don't even know who Adam Smith is?

It's long been obvious Obama is ignorant. It should be obvious everyone around him is ignorant, also.

Making a coin with Obama's image on it to pay the debt....
ROFLMAO

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5997
Jan 6, 2013
 
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Which is three shades smarter than an empty parasite sucking liberal.
Woah...
Don't hit them with so much obvious truth so early in the morning.
))))))
Stoneman

Boise, ID

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5998
Jan 6, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
What malaise?
Wait a tick.

You mean we're not in a high-unemployment period right now? Lessee-- the "unemployment rate" (those that haven't given up looking for a job yet) is nearly 8%. When GWBush had an unemployment rate at 6.3%(I remember this clearly) you lefties shrieked about the "worst economy since the Depression". What is it-- when Your Boy is in charge it's OK everything is just peachy because... he's so damn cool it doesn't matter?

By the way, if you think everything is peachy why did we keep the "unemployment insurance" compensation at TWO FREAKING YEARS? If the economy is just hunky-dory, wouldn't the only reason somebody couldn't find a job in TWO YEARS be he's just lazy? Or just a Democrat?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6000
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Yawn, just another empty attack folks, when loons can't play under the rules they attack..
You or ANY of your aliases planning on posting on topic this year DUMBO?

That would really throw everyone for a curve, DUMBO.

Far be it for you (or any of your aliases) to attack, eh, DUMBO?

DUMBO: what are the rules here with regard to posting under multiple ALIAS?

DUMBO?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6001
Jan 6, 2013
 
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Psssssssssst, we control the house,
PSSSSST: DUMBO... You don't control the House, where have you been for three weeks, DUMBO?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6002
Jan 6, 2013
 
Stoneman wrote:
<quoted text>
Wait a tick.
You mean we're not in a high-unemployment period right now?
Not as high as when Reagan was president.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Massachusetts Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gingrich: Mitt Romney is a liar (Jan '12) 13 hr foster 50
Steroids for sale (Nov '11) Aug 18 anabolic city 2
News Media & Politicians Hiding New Bedford Oce... Aug 17 Jack Kelly 1
New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal Jumps 62 M... Aug 16 Jack Kelly 1
Mass. Gov. Patrick wades into Market Basket fray Aug 16 Former MB Shopper 1
Mass. jobless rate down 1.6 percent since summe... Aug 15 Sony 4
If there is no God, no heaven or hell...then pl... (Nov '09) Aug 15 godisimaginary 310

Search the Massachusetts Forum:
•••