Yeah that's true...<quoted text>
No one is refuting real science here.
Shubee is a contender from time to time.
And i had a discussion with one researcher that was too optimistic with blast, and i was too polite to tell him.(20% without anyting else going for it is trash...your blast should show 80% to at least have a blind go....)
But nevertheless, puny para-science:
If a theory was 100% certain, then it would be a fact and not a theory.
Terryl: How hard do you have to work to maintain that level of ignorace? Consantly shutting out reality must take a lot of effort
Well to me, Cybele, that reads as if your statement is in doubt.