Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: CBS2

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Comments (Page 1,481)

Showing posts 29,601 - 29,620 of48,839
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34401
Jul 4, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
You rely on pejorative terminology and irrational prejudice:
Use of the word "condemn" is reveals your prejudice. Having parents of one gender is not a condemnation. We know it is the relationship between the child and the parents that determines success, not the gender of the parent. Unless raised in a bubble, the children will have role models of both genders in their lives.
Having parents of both genders is no guarantee of success. Abuse and divorce still happen. Anyone who has had any contact with CPS will also tell you, biological children are often abused, beaten, and killed by their biological parent, usually the father. It is irrational to believe having two opposite sex parents is a guarantee of success.
Children who are adopted are often rescued from a life of institutional care. They have not been condemned at all. Other children, as previously demonstrated, may have biological links to both parents, or may have one parent as the biological parent and the other as the birth parent.
Yet getting married does not require having children. Many straight and gay people have no such desire or intent, while others have no ability due to age, etc.
Therefore, this excuse for denial of equality is irrational.
I think your gay twirl is so severe, you just get more silly stupid all the time. No offense, just the honest truth.

This is simple reality; children in a gay union ALWAYS lose one gender and at least one parent is a indisputable fact.

Stating facts is not irrational or bigotry.

All you did was add a bunch of distorted and dishonest opinion. It did nothing to change what I said.

Moreover, imposing gay attempts to establish 'family' on the back of a child's preference for a natural mother and father is one of the most despicable acts I know of. It is so outrageous, it should be criminal.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34402
Jul 4, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me?
A 'intact' family is a mother, father and biological children.
A gay union can NEVER identify with a 'intact' family.
That really is disgusting gay twirl. It insults anyone who cares that every child deserves a mother and father or the very best substitute of that setting. Even more disturbing, it abuses the child to NOT pursue that.
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
You redefine "intact" to support your prejudice:
"Intact" means the original couple, with no separation or divorce, and no children removed due to neglect or abuse.
An opposite sex couple or a same sex couple with a child that was brought into that family whether through adoption or other means is still an intact family until one of the members of the family leaves prematurely. Your desire to demean such families is your prejudice, not a reflection of reality. Calling it "disgusting gay twirl" is again, your prejudice.
Providing a loving, secure environment is the opposite of abuse. Refusing to treat any child equally under the law however is an example of abuse.
Clearly and blatantly dishonest.

You did not say a intact couple, you said 'a intact family'.

A gay couple can NEVER equate to a intact family. That is a undeniable fact.

A child in such a gay union is always the result of a broken circumstance. Always slighted a parent and a gender. Those can be nothing but inherent disadvantages.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34403
Jul 4, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
And again, you rely on pejorative terminology, personal insults, and irrational prejudice to support your desire to harm gay couples and their families.
As previously demonstrated on this thread, gay people have always existed and have been accepted by many religious groups and cultures throughout history. That has even included blessing their unions. Your demeaning characterization of the acceptance of gay people as "crass uncivilized trampling of social customs" and false claim recognition "would desecrate every single significant religion and culture in existence" is simply false as well as insulting to those religious groups who support marriage equality.
Your stigmatizing, dehumanizing pejorative terminology fails to provide any legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of equal rights as required by the constitution.
You once again exhibit deep denial. The facts and history simply don't support your wishful thinking. The very fact that legal manipulation with distorted and dishonest information has been the sole tool of recent imposition of gay unions validates your denial and distortion.

I can't help it if the naked truth is 'stigmatizing, dehumanizing pejorative terminology'. Stop whining about it like girl.
Atheist

Frankfort, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34404
Jul 4, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me?
A 'intact' family is a mother, father and biological children.
A gay union can NEVER identify with a 'intact' family.
That really is disgusting gay twirl. It insults anyone who cares that every child deserves a mother and father or the very best substitute of that setting. Even more disturbing, it abuses the child to NOT pursue that.
<quoted text>
Clearly and blatantly dishonest.
You did not say a intact couple, you said 'a intact family'.
A gay couple can NEVER equate to a intact family. That is a undeniable fact.
A child in such a gay union is always the result of a broken circumstance. Always slighted a parent and a gender. Those can be nothing but inherent disadvantages.
Considering you don't know the word "an", I'm going to say that everything you have said is irrelevant.

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34405
Jul 4, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
all of your little diatribe is based upon one thing... your opinion. there's not one fact mentioned.

you assume tha tsame sex parents can't be the equal of opposite sex parents... you assume that they are somehow lacking. you assume that a same sex union is somehow bad for the children... but you never once mention the many same sex combined families due to second, third or forth marriages.

this is all based upon your opinion and nothing more.
Plays with peter

Fairfield, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34406
Jul 4, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Two lesbians and two gay guys are taking a trip, who gets to the airport faster?

The lesbians. While the lesbians go Lickity split, the gay men are still home packin their sh!t!
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34407
Jul 4, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

S.F. Gay Rights Leader Arrested Over Child Porn

S.F. CRIME:

Published 09:21 p.m., Monday, June 25, 2012:

San Francisco police have arrested veteran gay rights advocate Larry Brinkin in connection with felony possession of child pornography.

Brinkin, 66, who worked for the San Francisco Human Rights Commission before his retirement in 2010, was taken into custody Friday night. He spent the night in jail before he was released on bail, according to a spokeswoman for the sheriff's department.

The district attorney's office will decide Tuesday whether to file charges. "We're still reviewing the case," district attorney's spokeswoman Stephanie Ong Stillman said Monday.

Police say that Brinkin had pornographic images, some that appear to show children as young as 1 and 2 or 3 years old being sodomized and performing oral sex on adult men, in e-mail attachments linked to his account, according to a search warrant served by San Francisco police.

Representatives of America Online contacted authorities after coming across e-mail attachments from one of its subscriber's accounts containing what they believed to be child pornography.

The Los Angeles Police Department, which was assigned to the case, traced the IP address associated with the account, Zack3737@aol.com, to Brinkin, a San Francisco resident, according to court records. Los Angeles police forwarded the case to San Francisco police.

San Francisco investigators say the account was registered to Brinkin, and that he paid for the e-mail service with his credit card.
Police provided two examples of e-mail messages from last year in which Zack3737 provides disturbing descriptions of the exploitive sexual acts.

The e-mail account also is linked to Yahoo discussion groups on sexual exploitation of young boys and girls, according to the search warrant.
Executing a search warrant Friday, police seized two laptops, a desk top computer, videos, a floppy disk and thumb drives from Brinkin's Waller Street home.

During his 22-year tenure at the Human Rights Commission, Brinkin was best known for championing equal rights for gays and lesbians. He helped craft San Francisco's groundbreaking Equal Benefits Ordinance, which became a national model for workplace equality.

Upon Brinkin's retirement, the Board of Supervisors approved a resolution declaring the week of Feb. 1, 2010, "Larry Brinkin Week" in San Francisco, saying his "dedication to advance the civil rights of all people has never stopped."

Former Supervisor Bevan Dufty who authored the board resolution, said Monday that he was shocked to learn of Brinkin's arrest. "I have admired and respected his work for the LGBT community," Dufty said. "I respect and am confident that there will be due process."
kelsey

Hinckley, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34408
Jul 4, 2012
 
Saluki Rod who started this joke of a thread is just one more gay bag of crap attempting to stuff his sick lifestyle down Americas throat or up their ass.

This is not normal, and of course Saluki Rd is no where to be found.

Where are you , you degenerate pos?

Probably back in his gay cave.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34410
Jul 5, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me?
A 'intact' family is a mother, father and biological children.
A gay union can NEVER identify with a 'intact' family.
That really is disgusting gay twirl. It insults anyone who cares that every child deserves a mother and father or the very best substitute of that setting. Even more disturbing, it abuses the child to NOT pursue that.
<quoted text>
Clearly and blatantly dishonest.
You did not say a intact couple, you said 'a intact family'.
A gay couple can NEVER equate to a intact family. That is a undeniable fact.
A child in such a gay union is always the result of a broken circumstance. Always slighted a parent and a gender. Those can be nothing but inherent disadvantages.
Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Considering you don't know the word "an", I'm going to say that everything you have said is irrelevant.
If you are a bigot, it doesn't take much to be illogical.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34411
Jul 5, 2012
 
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
all of your little diatribe is based upon one thing... your opinion. there's not one fact mentioned.
you assume tha tsame sex parents can't be the equal of opposite sex parents... you assume that they are somehow lacking. you assume that a same sex union is somehow bad for the children... but you never once mention the many same sex combined families due to second, third or forth marriages.
this is all based upon your opinion and nothing more.
Avoiding a direct answer that would confirm your deceit.

Instead, digging in with stubborn stupidity. So foolish.

As to not mentioning straight, foster/step/adoptive families, untrue. My very assertion is that gay unions can never be more than one of those with the additional negative of missing one gender in parents.

You need to look up the difference between facts and opinions.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34412
Jul 5, 2012
 
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
all of your little diatribe is based upon one thing... your opinion. there's not one fact mentioned.
you assume tha tsame sex parents can't be the equal of opposite sex parents... you assume that they are somehow lacking. you assume that a same sex union is somehow bad for the children... but you never once mention the many same sex combined families due to second, third or forth marriages.
this is all based upon your opinion and nothing more.
Come on feebles, I listed just one. Explain to us how that is opinion and not fact. It really is a simple question, I didn't want to make it too complicated for you.

By the way, still waiting for your one example of self incest by stem cell impregnation deliberately birthing a child without one parent.

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34413
Jul 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
<quoted text>
Come on feebles, I listed just one. Explain to us how that is opinion and not fact. It really is a simple question, I didn't want to make it too complicated for you.
By the way, still waiting for your one example of self incest by stem cell impregnation deliberately birthing a child without one parent.
must suck being a lonely bigot on the 4th...lol

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34414
Jul 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lililth_Satans_Wh_ore wrote:
<quoted text>must suck being a lonely bigot on the 4th...lol
I'm never alone.

You?

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34416
Jul 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
<quoted text>
Come on feebles, I listed just one. Explain to us how that is opinion and not fact. It really is a simple question, I didn't want to make it too complicated for you.
By the way, still waiting for your one example of self incest by stem cell impregnation deliberately birthing a child without one parent.
one fact... human breeding has come to the point that it's no longer feasible. why the hell are you so hung up on it, anyway? do you really believe that every union should or must produce progeny?

another fact is that two women can and are breeding together and it's only a matter of time before medical science makes it possible for men, also. do you have a problem with that, too?

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34417
Jul 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm never alone.
You?
bullshit... your hand doesn't count.
Staggers with Drunks

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34418
Jul 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

That was below the belt.
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
bullshit... your hand doesn't count.

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34419
Jul 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm never alone.
You?
sure!!!!! You like alot of these homophobe bigots were on here all day yesterday... which was the 4th of july... I checked a couple times when I would come home to change outfits or clean up... I had 11 tricks yesterday... three dinners and two fireworks displays and finished off the night closing down two clubs..... while you lonely azz losers spread your hate of gays.... ya right you weren't alone... no family or spouse would hang with you morons

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34420
Jul 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lililth_Satans_Wh_ore wrote:
<quoted text>sure!!!!! You like alot of these homophobe bigots were on here all day yesterday... which was the 4th of july... I checked a couple times when I would come home to change outfits or clean up... I had 11 tricks yesterday... three dinners and two fireworks displays and finished off the night closing down two clubs..... while you lonely azz losers spread your hate of gays.... ya right you weren't alone... no family or spouse would hang with you morons
My wife and I spent the morning together (at which time I was on here off and on), then went to her sister's and had a early dinner with them.

We had invited anyone in the neighborhood to come at nine for fireworks. My brother-in-law and I set off over $700 in fireworks, our wives and some friends had popcorn, watermelon, brownies and such for the kids and everyone.

We live in different worlds, huh? The sadder fact is we will likely live in a different eternity. It's not too late.
kelsey

Hinckley, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34421
Jul 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
My wife and I spent the morning together (at which time I was on here off and on), then went to her sister's and had a early dinner with them.
We had invited anyone in the neighborhood to come at nine for fireworks. My brother-in-law and I set off over $700 in fireworks, our wives and some friends had popcorn, watermelon, brownies and such for the kids and everyone.
We live in different worlds, huh? The sadder fact is we will likely live in a different eternity. It's not too late.
These people are hard core,I hope you like beating your head against a brick wall.
These are some fierce haters of "normal" American life.
They will not stop their propaganda to push their lifestyle as normal and acceptable.

Good luck.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34422
Jul 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
<quoted text>
Come on feebles, I listed just one. Explain to us how that is opinion and not fact. It really is a simple question, I didn't want to make it too complicated for you.
By the way, still waiting for your one example of self incest by stem cell impregnation deliberately birthing a child without one parent.
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
one fact... human breeding has come to the point that it's no longer feasible. why the hell are you so hung up on it, anyway? do you really believe that every union should or must produce progeny?
another fact is that two women can and are breeding together and it's only a matter of time before medical science makes it possible for men, also. do you have a problem with that, too?
http://www.explorestemcells.co.uk/stem-cells-...

The techniques purported to allow same-sex reproduction have yet to be successful but they do hold promise. They include methods of cellular reprogramming and even techniques such as artificial chromosomes. While they have not been shown to work at present, they do hold potential for the future of same-sex reproduction. One particular technique involves the creation of sperm from human stem cells. In a recent experiment, bone marrow stem cells were extracted from men and they were then triggered into spermatogonia. These cells are able to develop into immature sperm cells. The experiment was widely reported in the news but has not yet been published or successfully replicated.

This article is dated June 1, 2012. You said your grandson was a successful stem cell self incest product of your daughter. Care to explain?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 29,601 - 29,620 of48,839
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

5 Users are viewing the Illinois Forum right now

Search the Illinois Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (Oct '10) 1 hr Corrupt Democrats 1,854
Rauner keeps up push for Illinois term limits 13 hr Corrupt Democrats 1
The Fed is dumpig illegals in Illinois. Mon Bob Rooney 1
Psychologists Could Write Prescriptions Mon humanSpirit 12
Don't fear concealed-carry permit holders Jul 20 Here Is One 2
Henry Paulson sounds alarm over global warming,... Jul 18 litesong 1
La Raza Demands Amnesty Vote from New Maj. Lead... Jul 18 Amigo 3
•••
•••