Sandy Hook parents join Gov. Patrick ...

Sandy Hook parents join Gov. Patrick in pressing for gun control

There are 8 comments on the Worcester Telegram & Gazette story from Sep 14, 2013, titled Sandy Hook parents join Gov. Patrick in pressing for gun control. In it, Worcester Telegram & Gazette reports that:

Nicole Hockley's 6-year-old son, Dylan, was killed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Connecticut last December.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Worcester Telegram & Gazette.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#1 Sep 15, 2013
"Someone shot and murdered my little son, so now I demand we eliminate the Bill of Rights. I deserve some revenge."
people died obama lied

Newnan, GA

#2 Sep 15, 2013
I wonder if someone in a chevy corvette Z1 speeding through a school zone killed their kids if they would demand oblunder shut down GM. Anyone can buy a Z1 that does 205 MPH. Do any on the left wing scumbags ever ask who would need a car that can do 205 in a nation where the speed limit is 70-80 MPH. I bet some of these parents who complain about the capability of 30 round magazines have cars easily capabal of doing over 100MPH. I guess they don't car about the 10,000 plus deaths each year on the highway,many of them school aged children, that are caused by SPEEDING
riven

Terre Haute, IN

#3 Sep 15, 2013
people died obama lied wrote:
I wonder if someone in a chevy corvette Z1 speeding through a school zone killed their kids if they would demand oblunder shut down GM. Anyone can buy a Z1 that does 205 MPH. Do any on the left wing scumbags ever ask who would need a car that can do 205 in a nation where the speed limit is 70-80 MPH. I bet some of these parents who complain about the capability of 30 round magazines have cars easily capabal of doing over 100MPH. I guess they don't car about the 10,000 plus deaths each year on the highway,many of them school aged children, that are caused by SPEEDING
the antis would say that we license people to drive for that reason. what they forget is driving is in fact a privilege where as gun ownership is a right. the difference: privileges are earned and granted whereas rights are owed and mandatory for freedom.
Well

York, PA

#4 Sep 15, 2013
riven wrote:
<quoted text>
the antis would say that we license people to drive for that reason. what they forget is driving is in fact a privilege where as gun ownership is a right. the difference: privileges are earned and granted whereas rights are owed and mandatory for freedom.
What they also forget is that you do not need a driver's license or a car registration to use a vehicle on your own property. Also, the driver's license is good in all 50 states. Somehow I do not think that is what the antis have in mind when it comes to firearms...
riven

Terre Haute, IN

#5 Sep 15, 2013
Well wrote:
<quoted text>
What they also forget is that you do not need a driver's license or a car registration to use a vehicle on your own property. Also, the driver's license is good in all 50 states. Somehow I do not think that is what the antis have in mind when it comes to firearms...
of course. what they have in mind is complete disarmament then pacification by force, in my opinion
people died obama lied

Newnan, GA

#6 Sep 15, 2013
riven wrote:
<quoted text>
the antis would say that we license people to drive for that reason. what they forget is driving is in fact a privilege where as gun ownership is a right. the difference: privileges are earned and granted whereas rights are owed and mandatory for freedom.
True...the hypocrisy on their part is if someone uses the the capabilities of a car and kills someone else the anti-gun nuts want the DRIVER of that car punished,they never demand cars with the ability to do twice the legal speed limit be removed from society. If someone uses the capabilities of a semi auto rifle they want THE WEAPON removed from society.
people died obama lied

Newnan, GA

#7 Sep 15, 2013
riven wrote:
<quoted text>
of course. what they have in mind is complete disarmament then pacification by force, in my opinion
They also like to say that a car is for transportation....yeah...a car that does 70-80 or 90 is designed for transportation....one that does 150-200MPH is designed for SPEEDING. They will also say people die in accidents while the shooting up a movie theater of a school is no accident. I can see a driver accidentaly going 10-20 MPH over the speed limit But someone doing 100 plus MPH is INTENTIONALLY DOING THAT SPEED it is not by accident

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#8 Sep 15, 2013
The would ban cars ("We'll freeze to death in the dark").

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Connecticut Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Paid family leave debate continues in Connecticut 21 hr Le Jimbo 1
News New Law Incubator Will Offer Affordable Legal Help Jan 13 lawyers indabag 4
Animal Cruelty ...Paws, Claws and More Animal R... (Mar '12) Jan 11 Nope 23
News Lembo pulls plug on Mississippi charity Jan 7 TomInElPaso 2
News States up security after Vt. reports Russian ma... Jan 3 Evilgelicalling 18
News The thirty-seven solar panels on Susan Young's ... Dec 29 Ahab the Arab 8
News Early voting initiative makes comeback in Conn. Dec 21 BPT 1
More from around the web