Global Warming Will Make Colorado Hot...

Global Warming Will Make Colorado Hotter, Right? But Will It Also Get Drier?

There are 62 comments on the The Telluride Watch story from May 27, 2010, titled Global Warming Will Make Colorado Hotter, Right? But Will It Also Get Drier?. In it, The Telluride Watch reports that:

" A new $1 million study suggests snowier and rainier winters in the northern mountains and drier ones in the southern mountains by the mid-21st century.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Telluride Watch.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#21 May 30, 2010
DL Probing wrote:
Thanks for making my point for me.
Why is it that Republicans are so ashamed to just admit as much these days?
Why the need for the Global Warming Lie Detector Test we just saw in such flawless action?
This is a lot for you to read but give it a try neolib:
I look at liberals, especially the libercon liberals like you, as those reasoning humans who intellectually are in their teenage years of their cultural and intellectual development. Since Liberalism is an exercise in being against more than one is for, the ideology therefore leaves itself void of principles or foundations leaving liberals just pouting, finger pointing with envy and demonizing any opposing view.
That is why all liberals are all en mass, on the same page for every single issue and thus their political correctness, dogma and double speak. They don’t realize how every unrealistic and utopian word that drops out of their mouths seem like empty t u r d s. Every CO2 environMENTAList is a libercon because their demonizing of opposing views justifies the dishonesty of motivating environmental responsibility with threats of death for our children. They truly believe that conservatives represent the wicked side of our species. If we could get past this liberal/animal way of reasoning, we could advance and evolve as a species.

Anyone who wasn't happy and relieved and overjoyed about climate gates revelations is not and never was a REAL environmentalist. Not being suspicious of this 24-year-old missing crisis for us to suffer from makes the believers, the new deniers.

Climate Changers: The New Neocons

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#22 May 30, 2010
Climate mitigation by government fiat, is evil. No climate tax, now or ever, no CO2 limits, no how, no way. We are greenhouse gas, here on Earth for a blink of eternity, give us a break. It's not like we'll barf on your driveway.

Let's party:)
Fun Facts

AOL

#23 May 31, 2010
It hasn't happened yet. Take a look, here's one way of measuring temps. It's different from the GISS or the CRU and the results are different too.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.ph...
LessHypeMoreFact

Woodstock, Canada

#24 May 31, 2010
Fun Facts wrote:
It hasn't happened yet. Take a look, here's one way of measuring temps. It's different from the GISS or the CRU and the results are different too.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.ph...
\

They are different because they are measuring different things, moron. GISS and CRU measure total global average anomalies. This is an anomaly for a single years variation. In other words, a yearly 'noise' value. Significant, but NOT the same thing as long term trends.
IAmDigitap

West Sacramento, CA

#25 Jun 2, 2010
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>\
They are different because they are measuring different things, moron. GISS and CRU measure total global average anomalies. This is an anomaly for a single years variation. In other words, a yearly 'noise' value. Significant, but NOT the same thing as long term trends.
You're headed for another round of entries into the "WHO is the STUPIDEST GLOBAL WARMER to ever POST HERE? poll.
LessHypeMoreFact

Woodstock, Canada

#26 Jun 2, 2010
IAmDigitap wrote:
<quoted text>
You're headed for another round of entries into the "WHO is the STUPIDEST GLOBAL WARMER to ever POST HERE? poll.
Nah. Think you have that sewn up. In fact, I'll vote for you..
princedavid7

Reed City, MI

#27 Jun 2, 2010
Al Gore is wrong, again!
LessHypeMoreFact

Woodstock, Canada

#28 Jun 2, 2010
princedavid7 wrote:
Al Gore is wrong, again!
So you are taking Tippers side?
uhh

Aurora, CO

#29 Jun 3, 2010
Global Warming is BS. Al Gore can't even keep a good marriage under his belt. An inconvienient truth my A**. Colorado has always been hot during summer and has always been cold during winter. It's known as the high desert for a reason people. Drier? That just sounded dumb. Cant get much drier than a desert and seeing as this is high desert you can't really get much drier than what a desert is supposed to be in the first place. Stop trying to freak people out with this nonsense.
LessHypeMoreFact

Woodstock, Canada

#30 Jun 4, 2010
uhh wrote:
Global Warming is BS.
Global warming is science. Science is not BS. We wouldn't be where we are today without science showing the way. Prior to science, we just went around in circles.
uhh wrote:
Al Gore can't even keep a good marriage under his belt.
Forty years and a 'failure'??

Clearly topix has attracted one more dim bulb.
Earthling

Hellín, Spain

#31 Jun 5, 2010
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
Global warming is science. Science is not BS. We wouldn't be where we are today without science showing the way. Prior to science, we just went around in circles.
Very odd comments from someone who once wrote:
"the science isn't going to change."
And:
"Deforestations is a consequence of AGW,...."
And:
"Scientific laws are NOT science."
LessHypeMoreFact

Woodstock, Canada

#32 Jun 6, 2010
Earthling wrote:
<quoted text>Very odd comments from someone who once wrote:
"the science isn't going to change."
And:
"Deforestations is a consequence of AGW,...."
And:
"Scientific laws are NOT science."
I have no idea what nonsense you are posting.

Not sure about quote #2 but I REITERATE that the science hasn't changed which is what I SAID in my post. Science rarely changes. And, as I said, the rise of science is what made modern society possible.

THe third is also correct. Science laws are purely 'observation', i.e data. Science is about the underlying LOGIC, not the data.

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php...

If you just used your brain or read a bit about what the words MEAN you might not make such an ass of yourself.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#33 Jun 6, 2010
I am greenhouse gas made live, for an eyblink of sunshine. My old fat bod absorbs IR too, though spectral carbon dioxide distribution is better in the atmosphere. Freeing carbon back to the biosphere. Life is beautiful.

Climate eden is here.
Earthling

Hellín, Spain

#34 Jun 6, 2010
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
I have no idea what nonsense you are posting.
I'm posting your nonsense, word for word.

"the science isn't going to change."
And:
"Deforestations is a consequence of AGW,...."
And:
"Scientific laws are NOT science."
And:
"The majority of LARGE offshore windmills are made by Enercon which has been gearless for quite some time."
And:
"Predictions are for astrologers."
And:
"Alberta is not my country"

The list of you goofs is longer that Topix allows in one post.
LessHypeMoreFact

Woodstock, Canada

#35 Jun 6, 2010
Earthling wrote:
<quoted text>I'm posting your nonsense, word for word.
"the science isn't going to change."
And:
"Deforestations is a consequence of AGW,...."
And:
"Scientific laws are NOT science."
And:
"The majority of LARGE offshore windmills are made by Enercon which has been gearless for quite some time."
And:
"Predictions are for astrologers."
And:
"Alberta is not my country"
The list of you goofs is longer that Topix allows in one post.
You have not shown ANY fault with ANY of my statements. I cannot help you with your delusions.
Earthling

Hellín, Spain

#36 Jun 6, 2010
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
You have not shown ANY fault with ANY of my statements. I cannot help you with your delusions.
"There are none so blind as those who cannot see."
In your case, those who are or should be ashamed of posting nonsense.

I'm posting your nonsense, word for word.

"According to YOUR theory, no car can be charged with hitting a pedestrian unless the pedestrian is already dead or too crippled to move."
And:
"the science isn't going to change."
And:
"Deforestations is a consequence of AGW,...."
And:
"Scientific laws are NOT science."
And:
"The majority of LARGE offshore windmills are made by Enercon which has been gearless for quite some time."
And:
"Predictions are for astrologers."
And:
"Alberta is not my country"
And
"This occurred when land life was limited to insects and plants so there were no species TO drive to extinction."
And:
"AGW is the global average. Local warming and cooling will be more controlled by local conditions."

The list of you goofs is longer that Topix allows in one post.
LessHypeMoreFact

Woodstock, Canada

#37 Jun 6, 2010
Earthling wrote:
<quoted text>"There are none so blind as those who cannot see."
In your case, those who are or should be ashamed of posting nonsense.
I'm posting your nonsense, word for word.
"According to YOUR theory, no car can be charged with hitting a pedestrian unless the pedestrian is already dead or too crippled to move."
And:
"the science isn't going to change."
And:
"Deforestations is a consequence of AGW,...."
And:
"Scientific laws are NOT science."
And:
"The majority of LARGE offshore windmills are made by Enercon which has been gearless for quite some time."
And:
"Predictions are for astrologers."
And:
"Alberta is not my country"
And
"This occurred when land life was limited to insects and plants so there were no species TO drive to extinction."
And:
"AGW is the global average. Local warming and cooling will be more controlled by local conditions."
The list of you goofs is longer that Topix allows in one post.
Post all you want. It doesn't make you any smarter. You have not shown ANY fault with ANY of my statements. I cannot help you with your delusions.
Earthling

Pinoso, Spain

#38 Sep 2, 2010
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
Forty years and a 'failure'??
Clearly topix has attracted one more dim bulb.
Oh how true, there's even one, "dim bulb" who decided only a month after writing this post that forty was an AmericaniZed spelling of, "fourty."
surprised

Ville Platte, LA

#39 Sep 2, 2010
Climate change is a hoax. (I've had that statement peer-reviewed, so I KNOW it's true)

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#40 Sep 2, 2010
Climate change mitigation has never been experimentally tested, or even tried.

Keep your prototype boondoggle hoax, get back to me after trying the scientific method and testing your hypothesis.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Colorado Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr Frankie Rizzo 34,769
Told what you can and cannot say at city-data? (Dec '07) 22 hr Denverian 6,199
News Boulder, Broomfield counties weigh impact of fr... Tue CO Honkey 1
Gang Stalking and psychological harassment (Jun '07) May 2 Elizabeth 18,620
News The Latest: Psychologist: Clinic shooting suspe... Apr 29 Hostis Publicus 3
News Dozens Arrested In Sex Trafficking Crackdown Apr 28 Elise Gingerich 3
Easiest college to get into Apr 27 anonymous27 1
More from around the web