Sonoma State University Student Kaitlyn Dunaway - Child Killer

Posted in the California Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of45
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Robert

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 6, 2011
 

Judged:

4

2

2

Sonoma State University Student Kaitlyn Dunaway is a Child Killer. Kaitlyn was driving illegally, using her cell phone while driving, when she struck and killed a 2 year old girl. Everyday I see dozens of young women using their cell phones while driving. It is dangerous and illegal. Because Kaitlyn is an ignorant b--ch who thumbed her nose at the law, an innocent little girl is dead.
The Ants

Fairfield, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Apr 16, 2011
 

Judged:

2

2

1

I agree 100%. Has she ever been charged?? Or did they let her off because she was the "all empire volleyball player of the year"? My guess it's the latter.

What a waste of life she is
Janel

Rohnert Park, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Apr 26, 2011
 

Judged:

2

2

1

F**k both of you people. You have no idea who she is. For you to say such horrible things about such a tragic accident makes both of you the waste of lives here.
Robert

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Apr 30, 2011
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Janel wrote:
F**k both of you people. You have no idea who she is. For you to say such horrible things about such a tragic accident makes both of you the waste of lives here.
It was not an accident. This poor child was killed because Kaitlyn committed an illegal crime. Driving while using a cell phone. It is both dangerous and illegal.
Mel

Santa Rosa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
May 14, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

Its funny how people dont even know what they are talking about. Have the facts to the case even come out yet. They never actually stated whether she was on the cell phone or not. Have you seen the street that this occurred on? Do you even know if it was safe for then=m to cross? What were the conditions? Can people get facts together before making ignorant statements?
Duh

San Rafael, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
May 16, 2011
 

Judged:

2

Dunnaway was TEXTING while driving. Her carelessness and selfishness and complete disregard for other people's safety resulted in a child killed and a critically injured mother. Kaitlyn Dunnaway has destored lives. What was so freaking important that she had to text while driving? Hoping she serves time in prison.
Duh

San Rafael, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
May 16, 2011
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Mel wrote:
Its funny how people dont even know what they are talking about. Have the facts to the case even come out yet. They never actually stated whether she was on the cell phone or not. Have you seen the street that this occurred on? Do you even know if it was safe for then=m to cross? What were the conditions? Can people get facts together before making ignorant statements?
Agreed. This was no accident. And those that call it that are just friends/family of the killer, Kaitlyn Dunnaway.
Duh

San Rafael, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
May 16, 2011
 
Janel wrote:
F**k both of you people. You have no idea who she is. For you to say such horrible things about such a tragic accident makes both of you the waste of lives here.
"tragic accident"? No. This was a woman texting while driving. She knew is was wrong, knew it was illegal, but who gives a hoot, as long as she can send texts while driving. What's more important? Certainly not someone else's life! An accident? No.
Timothy

Rohnert Park, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
May 17, 2011
 

Judged:

1

Wow...it wasn't an accident???? Are you serious? So she purposely meant to hit that kid? Look what she was doing was illegal obviously, but to say because she was committing an illegal activity while driving therefore its not an accident is ludicrous....I'm not defending Kaitlyn, but this was an ACCIDENT...she did not mean to hit the child...She F***** up, thats that and she will have to pay the price for her accident which COULD HAVE been avoided.
Duh

San Rafael, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
May 17, 2011
 

Judged:

1

Timothy wrote:
Wow...it wasn't an accident???? Are you serious? So she purposely meant to hit that kid? Look what she was doing was illegal obviously, but to say because she was committing an illegal activity while driving therefore its not an accident is ludicrous....I'm not defending Kaitlyn, but this was an ACCIDENT...she did not mean to hit the child...She F***** up, thats that and she will have to pay the price for her accident which COULD HAVE been avoided.
It's NOT an accident. Duh. She was doing something illegal and reckless,and she she knowingly endangered other people. That's why it's not an accident. Maybe if she'd slammed into you or one of your loved ones you'd see it differently. There's a difference between a REAL accident, and one where you're doing something illegal and kill someone. But folks like you don't get it.
Jason

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
May 17, 2011
 

Judged:

1

Timothy wrote:
Wow...it wasn't an accident???? Are you serious? So she purposely meant to hit that kid? Look what she was doing was illegal obviously, but to say because she was committing an illegal activity while driving therefore its not an accident is ludicrous....I'm not defending Kaitlyn, but this was an ACCIDENT...she did not mean to hit the child...She F***** up, thats that and she will have to pay the price for her accident which COULD HAVE been avoided.
Wrong Timothy. This was NOT an accident. Kaitlyn knew it was dangerous and illegal to text and drive. Her disregard for the law and safety of others killed a little girl. Her illegal and reckless actions killed a little girl. Kaitlyn thumbed her nose at the law. The laws are put in place for a reason. Kaitlyn was texting while driving (not paying attention) and driving at an unsafe speed, hitting two pedestrians who were crossing the street legally in a crosswalk. If Kaitlyn had killed your child I guarantee you'd be singing a whole different tune.
Duh

San Rafael, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
May 17, 2011
 
Jason wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong Timothy. This was NOT an accident. Kaitlyn knew it was dangerous and illegal to text and drive. Her disregard for the law and safety of others killed a little girl. Her illegal and reckless actions killed a little girl. Kaitlyn thumbed her nose at the law. The laws are put in place for a reason. Kaitlyn was texting while driving (not paying attention) and driving at an unsafe speed, hitting two pedestrians who were crossing the street legally in a crosswalk. If Kaitlyn had killed your child I guarantee you'd be singing a whole different tune.
OF course he would. When something this happens the supporters of the killer come out of the woodwork. Maybe he's a relative or friend of Dunaway's. They'll do anything, say anything to try to justify in their heads that their "girl" (kaitlyn) isn't a killer, just someone who "made a mistake anyone of us could have made".
Squirrel

Santa Clara, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
May 17, 2011
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Mel wrote:
Its funny how people dont even know what they are talking about. Have the facts to the case even come out yet. They never actually stated whether she was on the cell phone or not. Have you seen the street that this occurred on? Do you even know if it was safe for then=m to cross? What were the conditions? Can people get facts together before making ignorant statements?
Was it safe for them to cross? Let's see... there was a car coming that hadn't stopped and apparently had no intention of stopping. No, I'd say it wasn't safe. I'm sad for the family and the loss of this little girl. I'd also like to see pedestrians pay a little more attention and not take the "right-of-way" concept so seriously.
Squirrel

Santa Clara, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
May 17, 2011
 
Timothy wrote:
Wow...it wasn't an accident???? Are you serious? So she purposely meant to hit that kid? Look what she was doing was illegal obviously, but to say because she was committing an illegal activity while driving therefore its not an accident is ludicrous....I'm not defending Kaitlyn, but this was an ACCIDENT...she did not mean to hit the child...She F***** up, thats that and she will have to pay the price for her accident which COULD HAVE been avoided.
well said. it was poor judgement with a horrible outcome. it doesn't make it ok, but it doesn't make it intentional either.
Duh

San Rafael, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
May 17, 2011
 
Squirrel wrote:
<quoted text>
Was it safe for them to cross? Let's see... there was a car coming that hadn't stopped and apparently had no intention of stopping. No, I'd say it wasn't safe. I'm sad for the family and the loss of this little girl. I'd also like to see pedestrians pay a little more attention and not take the "right-of-way" concept so seriously.
Blaming the victims? Wow. Just wow.
Duh

San Rafael, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
May 17, 2011
 
Squirrel wrote:
<quoted text>
well said. it was poor judgement with a horrible outcome. it doesn't make it ok, but it doesn't make it intentional either.
No, but nor is it an accident. This was no accident. It was blatant disregard of the law. Hopefully time in jail (though not long enough) will give your volleyball star time to think about this.
Bay Area

El Macero, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
May 17, 2011
 
The misdemeanor charge is bulls**t however. Check online like SFGate for more details on the looming court date. The punishment should be akin to drunk driving and her driving privileges revoked (permanently?) along with mandatory time behind bars. No matter what or who you blame, the driver knowingly put lives in danger while operating a dangerous vehicle impaired. Emphasize knowingly. Emphasize impaired. Sounds a lot like a DUI description and the punishment should reflect it. A little girl is dead and a grieving family forever anguished. There is both a legal, rational argument as well as an emotional one.
CGT

San Francisco, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
May 17, 2011
 
Robert wrote:
<quoted text>
It was not an accident. This poor child was killed because Kaitlyn committed an illegal crime. Driving while using a cell phone. It is both dangerous and illegal.
Kaitlyn should have a Felony Manslaughter...no doubt. She made a tragic error in judgment...but you can't take this back. no sorry is enough. She is probably a great young lady...but as anyone else, who makes a bad judgment...there is a price for causing someone to be deceased.
malachy

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
May 18, 2011
 
you can understand someone's actions and even forgive their actions while at the same time seeking justice for a crime. this young woman chose to text AND speed while driving where there could be people walking. it was a choice. am sure she didn't wake up and decide to run over a mother and her daughter that day. am sure she is sorry. but it doesn't help society to say "what's done is done" when "what's done" is a death that was caused by recklessness. if the young woman had chosen to get drunk and then drive it would be a felony, but somehow because it was texting and because she's a "nice young woman" whose "family is hurting" she shouldn't face the same justice as someone who doesn't have the same circumstances.
ARE

Petaluma, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
May 22, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

This was an accident, this young women had NO intention of hurting this family or anyone. I think of how often I have driven that same street; I am focused on the light ahead. I think about how often pedestrians unconsciously walk across the street, because they have the right away. I say all this knowing I have not lost my baby daughter, but I feel this was a horrible accident. This young women should do community service, twice a month give speeches to high school students and college students. This unfortunate incident has affected my cell phone.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 20 of45
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

7 Users are viewing the California Forum right now

Search the California Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 4 min RiccardoFire 200,195
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 min Frank 173,559
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 36 min anonymous 50,371
California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 51 min Helpful Hank 4,835
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Lord Hater 45,437
California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 3 hr 21 and over 15,909
Riverside County:Tap Water Taste and Smell Unpl... 9 hr Chris 39
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••