Edith Windsor court ruling

Edith Windsor court ruling

There are 4 comments on the KIDK CBS 3 story from Feb 22, 2013, titled Edith Windsor court ruling. In it, KIDK CBS 3 reports that:

In a preview of a major constitutional showdown at the Supreme Court over same-sex marriage, the Obama administration said on Friday that a federal law denying financial benefits to legally wed gay and lesbian couples is unconstitutional.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KIDK CBS 3.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#1 Feb 23, 2013
Solicitor General Donald Verrilli has filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act:

“The law denies to tens of thousands of same-sex couples who are legally married under state law an array of important federal benefits that are available to legally married opposite-sex couples. Because this discrimination cannot be justified as substantially furthering any important governmental interest, Section 3 is unconstitutional.”

“The government has previously defended Section 3 under rational-basis review, and does not challenge the constitutionality of Section 3 under that highly deferential standard.”

“This is, however, the rare case in which deference to the democratic process must give way to the fundamental constitutional command of equal treatment under law. Section 3 of DOMA targets the many gay and lesbian people legally married under state law for a harsh form of discrimination that bears no relation to their ability to contribute to society. It is abundantly clear that this discrimination does not substantially advance an interest in protecting marriage, or any other important interest. The statute simply cannot be reconciled with the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection. The Constitution therefore requires that Section 3 be invalidated.”
Xavier Breath

West New York, NJ

#3 Feb 23, 2013
Andrei wrote:
Does anyone bother to read any of this queer's long-winded, asinine blather?
I know I sure as hell don't!
Nobody cares what you think, closet boy.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#4 Feb 23, 2013
You stopped reading after the third grade moron.
Andrei wrote:
Does anyone bother to read any of this queer's long-winded, asinine blather?
I know I sure as hell don't!

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#5 Feb 23, 2013
"Prejudices, it is well known, are most difficult to eradicate from the heart whose soil has never been loosened or fertilized by education; they grow there, firm as weeds among stones.” Charlotte Bronte

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 min tina anne 61,104
News Three sea otters that washed up on California's... 2 min bigtime healthcar... 2
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Dr Guru 222,888
News Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 8 hr RiccardoFire 201,890
News New California Climate Laws Mean More Electric ... 17 hr Solarman 1
News Landmark bill calls for steepest reductions in ... 17 hr ClintonBigOil 1
News Bill to increase farm overtime moves to Califor... Tue Stephany McDowell 1
More from around the web