BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 225461 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#187523 Mar 29, 2014
Guru wrote:
<quoted text>
Scrutinize this: speaking of patterns...
Why did obama (your hero) sign the deed on his house he bought in Chicago in 2009 as 'Harrison J Bounell", and put down his social security #(which obama has been using for years because he stole it)? HJB was born over 123 years ago and has been dead for years!
obama signed the man's name in his own handwriting, using the dead man's SS#, while forging the dead man's name, on the deed of his house, that he bought from Resko, a known and convicted felon. Why is that? And while you are at it, why did Michelle go back in a day later and alter the document?
See any patterns here with obama that involve FRAUD, FORGERY, and THEFT? Because we are seeing that in everything he does. He has been a 5-years scandal-- 24/7/365 in everything he does! obama really fked up on the deed thing. He had to sign it as HJB to match the SS# he has stolen. See anything wrong with that??-lol! In that state they check everything, and obama had no ID that would pass for even little league!!(a valid birth certificate). In his greed he caught himself. Now they have tied him using his stolen SS# BEFORE, and AFTER the deed signing. He even forged the name on his own deed by signing it as HJB. Boy, how dumb can you get??! Law enforcement has the documents. So does Vogt, as well as 75 pages of affidavits to prove all of it.
Arpaio has this as well, and a whole lot more. And yes, it will be UNIVERSE-SHATTERING! Anyone that screws up like this is bound to get caught.
Now....be a good little OBOT and check your goofy Snopes/etc. hack sites for liberal morons, that tries to give you an ounce of credibility-lol! You OBOT'S all act the same: you mock and you lie....just like your hero obama. Then you re-invent the moon! to "justify" the fact that you cannot cover up for this fraudster. NO MATTER how you try, you are in deep shyt with this guy. LOL! Enjoy your ass-kicking at the midterms!, as well as the web of obama's lies that now are surrounding obama. He has no way out no matter what he says (or you). He will be very likely if he doesn't end up in prison for treason. You can bring him his suckers once a month since you are good at that.
ROTFLMAO!!!
All in time. I will be happy to discuss all this as soon as you can show me Obama's sister created his BC with a stolen form.

I dislike Obama for a lot of reasons. None of them deviate from reality.

Treason? You are worse off than I thought.

Guilty? Probably... but not for the insanity above.

If you think we still charge presidents with treason... you are crazy. Obama isn't doing anything but improving the model Dubbya left him. More invasive, more efficient, more effective control.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#187524 Mar 29, 2014
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>All in time. I will be happy to discuss all this as soon as you can show me Obama's sister created his BC with a stolen form.

I dislike Obama for a lot of reasons. None of them deviate from reality.

Treason? You are worse off than I thought.

Guilty? Probably... but not for the insanity above.

If you think we still charge presidents with treason... you are crazy. Obama isn't doing anything but improving the model Dubbya left him. More invasive, more efficient, more effective control.
You speak sanity. Rouge can't hear that

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#187525 Mar 29, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
A lot of USSC rulings are 4/5 or 5/4 but what if the Hobby Lobby ruling is 6/3?
Later, Justices Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer asked what would happen if Congress passed a law similar to a recent Danish enactment barring the slaughtering of animals while they are conscious. Would for-profit butcher shops run by Jews or Muslims be allowed exemptions? The three women justices were disinclined to exempt for-profit companies. Not so, the six men.
Look for a likely 6-3 ruling that if you like your god, you can keep your god, even if you also have to make a living.
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2014/03/28/t...
The Danes did NOT grant Jews and Moslems exemptions.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187526 Mar 29, 2014
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Romney was a shoe-in to win. Slam dunk. And if Ginsberg thought Obama would lose she would resign. But apparently Rougie believes Ginsberg is deaf dumb and blind and couldn't see the handwriting on the wall.
Oooops, then Romney got his arse kicked.
LOL.
Hmmmm, of all the pollsters, Nate Silvers was the one that most consistently said that Obama would win in 2012. Do you still have faith in Nate Silvers for his prediction for the Senatorial races for 2014?
Nate has predicted that the REPUBLICANS have a 60% chance of retaking the Senate this year. What say you?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187527 Mar 29, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
A lot of USSC rulings are 4/5 or 5/4 but what if the Hobby Lobby ruling is 6/3?
Later, Justices Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer asked what would happen if Congress passed a law similar to a recent Danish enactment barring the slaughtering of animals while they are conscious. Would for-profit butcher shops run by Jews or Muslims be allowed exemptions? The three women justices were disinclined to exempt for-profit companies. Not so, the six men.
Look for a likely 6-3 ruling that if you like your god, you can keep your god, even if you also have to make a living.
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2014/03/28/t ...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
The Danes did NOT grant Jews and Moslems exemptions.
I provided a link, did you?
Oh, as of LAST month they no longer did, did they? And ain't it phunny that a stew ped chopper pilot like me-self could find a link too bake up me point. Methinks you needs two learn too Google!

Denmark

In February 2014, Minister for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Dan Jørgensen signed a regulation which banned ritual slaughter of animals without prior stunning. Prior to this, religious groups could file for an exemption to the law that required stunning if they wanted to slaughter without prior stunning, although no groups had applied for such exemption. At the time, all halal slaughter in Denmark was performed with prior stunning, while kosher slaughter (which does not allow stunning) had not been practiced in Denmark since around 2004, all kosher meat being imported. In spite of this, the Muslim and Jewish Communities in Denmark strongly opposed the decree, arguing that it constituted an infringement upon religious freedom.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_aspects_of...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187528 Mar 29, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
A lot of USSC rulings are 4/5 or 5/4 but what if the Hobby Lobby ruling is 6/3?
Later, Justices Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer asked what would happen if Congress passed a law similar to a recent Danish enactment barring the slaughtering of animals while they are conscious. Would for-profit butcher shops run by Jews or Muslims be allowed exemptions? The three women justices were disinclined to exempt for-profit companies. Not so, the six men.
Look for a likely 6-3 ruling that if you like your god, you can keep your god, even if you also have to make a living.
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2014/03/28/t ...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
The Danes did NOT grant Jews and Moslems exemptions.
Hmmmm, I think Denmark, like Canada, has a parliamentary government which means they have a parliament and not have a Congress like we Americans do.
But here is another link that says Denmark DID HAVE religious exemptions for the slaughter of animals. Please note, that is past tense and they did you the word "exemption"!!!

Denmark outlaws Jewish and Muslim ritual slaughter as of next week
By SAM SOKOL - 02/14/2014
"Slaughterhouses will no longer be able to apply for an exemption from pre-stunning."

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187529 Mar 29, 2014
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>All in time. I will be happy to discuss all this as soon as you can show me Obama's sister created his BC with a stolen form.

I dislike Obama for a lot of reasons. None of them deviate from reality.

Treason? You are worse off than I thought.

Guilty? Probably... but not for the insanity above.

If you think we still charge presidents with treason... you are crazy. Obama isn't doing anything but improving the model Dubbya left him. More invasive, more efficient, more effective control.
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
You speak sanity. Rouge can't hear that
Where have I ever said you did the forgery? Come on now, show us where I said that.
Oh, if you read our Constitution, proving someone is treasonous is very difficult. In England back in the 18th Century, it was very easy to do and they would cut you head off Old Henry the 8th was real good at torturing confessions out of people.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187530 Mar 29, 2014
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
The way I see it Rogue, the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion.
This only goes so far. The law will always trump religious beliefs.
People have come up with all kinds of crap to make an end run around law using freedom of religion.
There is an entire religion based on marijuana now. Does that stop them from getting arrested? Hell no.
Bible says you should stone out of control children. Think that is going to fly?
Religious people are still free to practice their religion, they just have to make the choice.
If "hobby lobby" feels that strongly, they will pay the fines rather than provide healthcare.
They have the freedom to do that.
I can't seem to connect how denying birth control to people is free practice of your religion.
I see it as subjecting others to your religion. You don't want to use birth control... fine. But you can't force that on to others.
In conclusion, if "Hobby Lobby" is what they say they are.... then they have no employees who would use it anyhow. You are either a business OR a religious institution. Gotta make a decision.
Well, what did Chief Justice Thomas say about that issue a few days ago?
"But there is no law like that on the books." Justice John Roberts shot back, "Isn't that what we are talking about ...?"
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2014/03/28/t...

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#187531 Mar 29, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>All in time. I will be happy to discuss all this as soon as you can show me Obama's sister created his BC with a stolen form.
I dislike Obama for a lot of reasons. None of them deviate from reality.
Treason? You are worse off than I thought.
Guilty? Probably... but not for the insanity above.
If you think we still charge presidents with treason... you are crazy. Obama isn't doing anything but improving the model Dubbya left him. More invasive, more efficient, more effective control.
<quoted text>
Where have I ever said you did the forgery? Come on now, show us where I said that.
Oh, if you read our Constitution, proving someone is treasonous is very difficult. In England back in the 18th Century, it was very easy to do and they would cut you head off Old Henry the 8th was real good at torturing confessions out of people.
Agreed about getting confessions....

I don't think anyone said that you claim we made Obama's BC.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187532 Mar 29, 2014
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
The way I see it Rogue, the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion.
This only goes so far. The law will always trump religious beliefs.
People have come up with all kinds of crap to make an end run around law using freedom of religion.
There is an entire religion based on marijuana now. Does that stop them from getting arrested? Hell no.
Bible says you should stone out of control children. Think that is going to fly?
Religious people are still free to practice their religion, they just have to make the choice.
If "hobby lobby" feels that strongly, they will pay the fines rather than provide healthcare.
They have the freedom to do that.
I can't seem to connect how denying birth control to people is free practice of your religion.
I see it as subjecting others to your religion. You don't want to use birth control... fine. But you can't force that on to others.
In conclusion, if "Hobby Lobby" is what they say they are.... then they have no employees who would use it anyhow. You are either a business OR a religious institution. Gotta make a decision.
Let's try this. Suppose your religion says, "Thou shall not kill" and you are called in for jury duty and the suspect is subject to being executed but only if all the the jury members agree. So before the trial you are asked if you religion prevents you from ordering the execution, what will happen to you if you say you can not? Most likely you will not be impaneled in the jury. How about the judge? Is he obligated to remove himself from the case? What if he does not and then over rules the jury's verdict?
If you are the OWNER of a company, can the government fire you from your company simply because you will not sign an insurance document that goes against your religious beliefs?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187533 Mar 29, 2014
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed about getting confessions....
I don't think anyone said that you claim we made Obama's BC.
Who is "we"? Some one make the fake Certificate of Live Birth and Berth Certificate that have been published by Obama as they are of copies of any documents!!!
I have a COPY of the birth certificate but on that COPY is a multicolored seal and the signature of the official you certified that COPY!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187534 Mar 29, 2014
If Nate Silver was right in 2012, will he be right in 2014? Come on now, don't one of you Libtards have the testicular fortitude to answer that question?!?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187535 Mar 29, 2014
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>you mean the 'planted' birth announcements? Show us an original newspaper, with the announced birth?
Oh I think the announcements were real but all they give is the parents' names and residential addresses and not where Barrack Jr. was born. Now this is probably a copy of a real Hawaiian BC but it does not say Barrack Jr. was born in Hawaii, does it. Oh, and unlike the ones posted by Obama, it does not look forged!!!

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/05/wnd-de...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#187536 Mar 29, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
A lot of USSC rulings are 4/5 or 5/4 but what if the Hobby Lobby ruling is 6/3?
Later, Justices Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer asked what would happen if Congress passed a law similar to a recent Danish enactment barring the slaughtering of animals while they are conscious. Would for-profit butcher shops run by Jews or Muslims be allowed exemptions? The three women justices were disinclined to exempt for-profit companies. Not so, the six men.
Look for a likely 6-3 ruling that if you like your god, you can keep your god, even if you also have to make a living.
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2014/03/28/t ...
<quoted text>
Hmmmm, I think Denmark, like Canada, has a parliamentary government which means they have a parliament and not have a Congress like we Americans do.
But here is another link that says Denmark DID HAVE religious exemptions for the slaughter of animals. Please note, that is past tense and they did you the word "exemption"!!!
Denmark outlaws Jewish and Muslim ritual slaughter as of next week
By SAM SOKOL - 02/14/2014
"Slaughterhouses will no longer be able to apply for an exemption from pre-stunning."
You forgot the link.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#187537 Mar 29, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's try this. Suppose your religion says, "Thou shall not kill" and you are called in for jury duty and the suspect is subject to being executed but only if all the the jury members agree. So before the trial you are asked if you religion prevents you from ordering the execution, what will happen to you if you say you can not? Most likely you will not be impaneled in the jury. How about the judge? Is he obligated to remove himself from the case? What if he does not and then over rules the jury's verdict?
If you are the OWNER of a company, can the government fire you from your company simply because you will not sign an insurance document that goes against your religious beliefs?
Romans 13:1-4,

"Obey the government , for God is the one who has put it there. There is no government anywhere that God has not placed in power. So those who refuse to obey the laws of the land are refusing to obey God, and punishment will follow. For the policeman does not frighten people who are doing right; but those doing evil will always fear him. So if you don't want to be afraid, keep the laws and you will get along well. The policeman is sent by God to help you. But if you are doing something wrong, of course you should be afraid, for he will have you punished. He is sent by God for that very purpose."

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187538 Mar 29, 2014
Hey, LiveScience has discovered a way of stopping Global Warming. All we need is a small nuclear war between India and Pakistan?
It would take care of the over population of Pakistan and India and stop Global Warming. Sounds like a winning solution to me.
BTW, if blowing up two 15 Kt bombs in Japan in 1945 had no measurable effect on the Global temperature, why would you think the equivalent of Mount Pinatubo eruption in 1991 cause "catastrophic cooling"?

'Small' Nuclear War Could Trigger Catastrophic Cooling
LiveScience.com
By By Charles Q. Choi, LiveScience Contributor 4 hours ago
http://news.yahoo.com/small-nuclear-war-could...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#187539 Mar 29, 2014
Where has everyone gone. My girl friend is napping, as she goes to work 11:00 PM tonight, and none of you Libtards want to play!

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#187540 Mar 29, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Well, what did Chief Justice Thomas say about that issue a few days ago?
"But there is no law like that on the books." Justice John Roberts shot back, "Isn't that what we are talking about ...?"
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2014/03/28/t...
Justice Roberts has lost his credibility TO THE NSA.
just stay until The WhiteHouse gets an American.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#187541 Mar 29, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Who is "we"? Some one make the fake Certificate of Live Birth and Berth Certificate that have been published by Obama as they are of copies of any documents!!!
I have a COPY of the birth certificate but on that COPY is a multicolored seal and the signature of the official you certified that COPY!!!
When you are asked to provide your BC, it doesn't have to be an original.

As long as the numbers on the BC match up with the info on the form... it is valid.

Hell, I lost my original BC before I was 16. My copy has no multicolored seal. Just a blue boarder.

Are you suggesting Obama forks over his original BC (if he still has it from 3 or 4 continents, a multitude of countries, and 50 years) so it may be encased in glass at the Smithsonian until every birther in America gets his chance to examine it themselves?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#187542 Mar 29, 2014
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I think the announcements were real but all they give is the parents' names and residential addresses and not where Barrack Jr. was born. Now this is probably a copy of a real Hawaiian BC but it does not say Barrack Jr. was born in Hawaii, does it. Oh, and unlike the ones posted by Obama, it does not look forged!!!
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/05/wnd-de...
Ok Rogue... this is where the whole thing falls apart.

You agree with me that the announcements are real. That is all I need.

I don't need them as proof he his from Hawaii. I just need them to exist.

Think about it Rogue, if Obama was born ANYWHERE else...Canada, Mexico... let's just say Kenya... he was already a citizen of the US through his mother. Just not an NBC.

From you explaining your sister's situation to me... I think I can safely say we agree on that.

Now, the only difference between an NBC and a citizen is that you can be President.

What was the motivation behind the birth announcements Rouge?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 61,466
Election California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Sat Go Blue Forever 16,058
News Three sea otters that washed up on California's... Sep 22 Horrified 4
News 2016's hellish summer weather: A told-you-so cl... Sep 21 Go Blue Forever 1
News California wildfire becomes costliest ever to f... Sep 20 Anonymous 1
News Group says it has sued Dow over pesticide used ... Sep 20 Stephany McDowell 1
African Americans support Donald Trump Sep 20 Jeffrey 1
More from around the web