• Sections
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

# BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 240283 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180976 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
4.4 in 8 or 6+ in 5? LMAO! You don't have a leg to stand on. Other than some skewed numbers. LMAO! Typical DIM!!!
Irrelevant.

1. Bayou twerp disputed the 76% figure because he unwittingly believed the correct percentage should be calculated from 5.6/10.0. He was caught red handed being ignorant and stupid.

2. 4.4 in 8 vs 6+ in 5 is also irrelevant. The rates of change in the debt for the last two fiscal years of Bush budgets were +5.41% and +7.51%, respectively. These were the highest rates of change since Bush's +4.90% in 2002, which was in turn the highest since Papa Bush's +3.35% in 1990. The rates of change under each fiscal year of Budgets following GW Bush's are -4.94%,-4.81%, and -0.43%. Notice the negative signs? Duh! That means Obama has managed to slow down the out of control train after Dubya handed over the controls.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180977 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Look at the little twerp in denial. Why did he think the 76% had anything to do with 76% of 10.025 T. Why oh why? Because he's an innumerate twerp.
Twerp: "5.6T is 76% of 10.025T? 66% is also incorrect. Only a DIM!!!!!"
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Do the math moron.(10.025-5.674)/5.674 X 100 = DUH!
It's 76.7%, jackass. You know it now that the egg is all over your face.
This denial is as dumb as LRS's "Harvard Study" fiasco. Hilarious.
<quoted text>
Forget it, wojar. He's dumb, a nitwit and this is not the first time he stupidly corrects a superior being and then falls flat on his face, which makes him twist and turn even more. That's when the ad hominem comes out, well, just look at the vocabulary in last few posts, namely : Mr. BS, clowns, dumbazz (2), slumlord, twit boys, DIM, squid and fool. All that in less than 2 pages and confined to debt percentage posts only. So much apoplexy when he's wrong.

Oh, BTW, birther clown decided he'd like to be mocked some more, decided to totally misinterpret the verb "plagiarized". It doesn't get any better than that.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180978 Dec 2, 2013
...or the word "plagiarism".

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180979 Dec 2, 2013
LRS : still waiting to be shown where I spoke ill of the dead (your mom?) and Jesus. Will you be informing me at the same time you'll be revealing why you wrote "Can you see us coming" daily for a whole month prior to Nov 2012 and then stopped suddenly after Obama won...yet again? Waiting, eh boy.
Dale
#180980 Dec 2, 2013
Under Roe v. Wade, the USSC came down on the side of privacy (when it comes health care), you really have to see the following.

Now, which USSC ruling do we follow and when will life insurance be a requirement? I wonder if the government will be the beneficiary.

Just a though!
Justice LRS
#180981 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Irrelevant.
1. Bayou twerp disputed the 76% figure because he unwittingly believed the correct percentage should be calculated from 5.6/10.0. He was caught red handed being ignorant and stupid.
2. 4.4 in 8 vs 6+ in 5 is also irrelevant. The rates of change in the debt for the last two fiscal years of Bush budgets were +5.41% and +7.51%, respectively. These were the highest rates of change since Bush's +4.90% in 2002, which was in turn the highest since Papa Bush's +3.35% in 1990. The rates of change under each fiscal year of Budgets following GW Bush's are -4.94%,-4.81%, and -0.43%. Notice the negative signs? Duh! That means Obama has managed to slow down the out of control train after Dubya handed over the controls.
Damn boy, you are an idiot. Bush added 4.4T over 8 years. That's roughly 500B a year. Obobblehead has added 6+T in 5 years. That's over 1T a year. Can you see the rate of change? LMAO! DUH! R U on drugs? R U on LSD? HUH? LMAO! DAB!
Justice LRS
#180982 Dec 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
LRS : still waiting to be shown where I spoke ill of the dead (your mom?) and Jesus. Will you be informing me at the same time you'll be revealing why you wrote "Can you see us coming" daily for a whole month prior to Nov 2012 and then stopped suddenly after Obama won...yet again? Waiting, eh boy.
Why do you need to be shown every post of yours that gets brought up? Do you have no memory? You know and so do I, what you've said, on more than one occasion too. Like I've said, you're a real piece of work, Path. You're a peon and you're too stupid to figure out why! LMAO!!!

Tip for the fruitcake: When you run too many puppets, you can't keep up with all of them! LMAO! Share some of your transparency with Obobblehead, will ya? LMAO!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180983 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn boy, you are an idiot. Bush added 4.4T over 8 years. That's roughly 500B a year. Obobblehead has added 6+T in 5 years. That's over 1T a year. Can you see the rate of change? LMAO! DUH! R U on drugs? R U on LSD? HUH? LMAO! DAB!
The imbecilic birfoon does not comprehend what the RATE OF CHANGE is.

-4.94%,-4.81%, and -0.43%. Duh! The numbers don't lie.

The fy ending in in 9/30/2010 showed an increase of 13.869% which was less than the increase of 18.802%(under the last fy budget of Dubya ending 9/30/2009). That's a RATE OF CHANGE of -4.94%. Fool.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Irrelevant.
1. Bayou twerp disputed the 76% figure because he unwittingly believed the correct percentage should be calculated from 5.6/10.0. He was caught red handed being ignorant and stupid.
2. 4.4 in 8 vs 6+ in 5 is also irrelevant. The rates of change in the debt for the last two fiscal years of Bush budgets were +5.41% and +7.51%, respectively. These were the highest rates of change since Bush's +4.90% in 2002, which was in turn the highest since Papa Bush's +3.35% in 1990. The rates of change under each fiscal year of Budgets following GW Bush's are -4.94%,-4.81%, and -0.43%. Notice the negative signs? Duh! That means Obama has managed to slow down the out of control train after Dubya handed over the controls.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#180984 Dec 2, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
From a woman of faith who loves America:‘Black people have been deceived’[VIDEO]
What exactly do you think she means by Native Born Citizen?
"There is no way I can look at where I started from and the opportunities I had and not say that there isn't a god."

No need to listen any further. And the double negative coming from a professor has little to do with it.

I escaped poverty.
Hence, there is a god.

She goes on to pin the Orwellian swing the US is taking on Obama.

If she would have read 1984 twenty years ago... she would be aware that this is not even close to a new experience.

Obama is just running his leg of the race.

He will pass the baton in 2016 to Hillary or the Goldman Sachs approved GOP candidate. They will continue serving the interest of the world banking cartel and the military industrial complex.
Justice LRS
#180985 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The imbecilic birfoon does not comprehend what the RATE OF CHANGE is.
-4.94%,-4.81%, and -0.43%. Duh! The numbers don't lie.
The fy ending in in 9/30/2010 showed an increase of 13.869% which was less than the increase of 18.802%(under the last fy budget of Dubya ending 9/30/2009). That's a RATE OF CHANGE of -4.94%. Fool.
<quoted text>
Slice and dice the numbers all you want, idiot. The fact is, O has spent more in five years than Bush did in eight! In fact, O has spent more than all previous presidents combined BUT he's slowed the rate of change! LMAO! The rate of change does not tell the entire story, does it fool? Nope. It only presents a skewed picture of reality. Ah, that's where I'm losing you...reality! LMAO! peon

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180986 Dec 2, 2013
The drunken engineer is asleep at the switch, during a time interval t1 to t2, it's speed increases from 86 to 95 mph (Out of control). When a sober person takes over the controls, he manages to slow down the train from 95 to 87 mph over the same size time interval (t2 to t3). The distance traveled under the second engineer (during t2 to t3) is greater than that traveled by the train in the interval t1 to t2.

According to birfoon physics, that means the train was speeding up under the second engineer (Obama) and slowing down under the first (Bush). This is despite the fact that it was accelerating out of control under Dubya and decelerating under Obama.

This is because birfoons cannot understand what a derivitave is. Instantaneous velocity ( ds/dt is the first derivative. The rate of change of velocity dv/dt is the second derivative.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
Justice LRS
#180987 Dec 2, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
"There is no way I can look at where I started from and the opportunities I had and not say that there isn't a god."
No need to listen any further. And the double negative coming from a professor has little to do with it.
I escaped poverty.
Hence, there is a god.
She goes on to pin the Orwellian swing the US is taking on Obama.
If she would have read 1984 twenty years ago... she would be aware that this is not even close to a new experience.
Obama is just running his leg of the race.
He will pass the baton in 2016 to Hillary or the Goldman Sachs approved GOP candidate. They will continue serving the interest of the world banking cartel and the military industrial complex.
O ye of little faith and blind eyes.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180988 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you need to be shown every post of yours that gets brought up? Do you have no memory? You know and so do I, what you've said, on more than one occasion too. Like I've said, you're a real piece of work, Path. You're a peon and you're too stupid to figure out why! LMAO!!!
Tip for the fruitcake: When you run too many puppets, you can't keep up with all of them! LMAO! Share some of your transparency with Obobblehead, will ya? LMAO!
I knew you couldn't. What a blowhard. Called your bluff, this must be the 100th time, usual dumb ad hominem response.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180989 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Slice and dice the numbers all you want, idiot. The fact is, O has spent more in five years than Bush did in eight! In fact, O has spent more than all previous presidents combined BUT he's slowed the rate of change! LMAO! The rate of change does not tell the entire story, does it fool? Nope. It only presents a skewed picture of reality. Ah, that's where I'm losing you...reality! LMAO! peon
Sorry, loser, the numbers show that rate of change of annual increase (totally out of control and increasing under Dubya) diminished under Obama. That means, Dumbo, that Dubya was asleep at the wheel with the pedal to the metal and Obama put on the brakes.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The imbecilic birfoon does not comprehend what the RATE OF CHANGE is.
-4.94%,-4.81%, and -0.43%. Duh! The numbers don't lie.
The fy ending in in 9/30/2010 showed an increase of 13.869% which was less than the increase of 18.802%(under the last fy budget of Dubya ending 9/30/2009). That's a RATE OF CHANGE of -4.94%. Fool.
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#180990 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Slice and dice the numbers all you want, idiot. The fact is, O has spent more in five years than Bush did in eight! In fact, O has spent more than all previous presidents combined BUT he's slowed the rate of change! LMAO! The rate of change does not tell the entire story, does it fool? Nope. It only presents a skewed picture of reality. Ah, that's where I'm losing you...reality! LMAO! peon
Are you finished? Is there no limit to your ignorance? Why do you do this? Why dig yourself even deeper? You are stupid, you act stupid, you look stupid. "Libtards" (Rogue tm reg,d) have stomped you and EVEN your birther ilk can't bear to look, so pitiful and pathetic are you. Stop squirming, kneel, grovel, ask for mercy, LOSER.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
Justice LRS
#180991 Dec 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I knew you couldn't. What a blowhard. Called your bluff, this must be the 100th time, usual dumb ad hominem response.
You truly are delusional, peon.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
Justice LRS
#180992 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, loser, the numbers show that rate of change of annual increase (totally out of control and increasing under Dubya) diminished under Obama. That means, Dumbo, that Dubya was asleep at the wheel with the pedal to the metal and Obama put on the brakes.
<quoted text>
What this means is perfectly clear, you're stupid.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

#180993 Dec 2, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Slice and dice the numbers all you want, idiot. The fact is, O has spent more in five years than Bush did in eight! In fact, O has spent more than all previous presidents combined BUT he's slowed the rate of change! LMAO! The rate of change does not tell the entire story, does it fool? Nope. It only presents a skewed picture of reality. Ah, that's where I'm losing you...reality! LMAO! peon
Maths was never LTS's strong point.

Bush didn't start with out of control deficits. He was handed a stable economy delivered under the steady hand of Bill Clinton. Obama was given a craft spiraling downward screaming out of control at a high rate of speed. The fact remains Obama put on the brakes while Dubya had the pedal to the metal while blindfolded. That's what the numbers show. That's a fact.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
Justice LRS
#180994 Dec 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you finished? Is there no limit to your ignorance? Why do you do this? Why dig yourself even deeper? You are stupid, you act stupid, you look stupid. "Libtards" (Rogue tm reg,d) have stomped you and EVEN your birther ilk can't bear to look, so pitiful and pathetic are you. Stop squirming, kneel, grovel, ask for mercy, LOSER.
You TARDS have no leg to stand on, except for skewed numbers. Typical, so damn typical of DIMs! Smoke and mirrors, unable to accept their own failures. You clowns are perfect clones of Obobblehead! Oh, for your macho show, pfft. I "do" know what you look like! heh heh heh suck on it boy
Justice LRS
#180995 Dec 2, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Maths was never LTS's strong point.
Bush didn't start with out of control deficits. He was handed a stable economy delivered under the steady hand of Bill Clinton. Obama was given a craft spiraling downward screaming out of control at a high rate of speed. The fact remains Obama put on the brakes while Dubya had the pedal to the metal while blindfolded. That's what the numbers show. That's a fact.

#### Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

### California Discussions

How tax breaks aim to keep companies growing in... 50 min Solarman 3
Survey: Most Californians support school a sanc... 7 hr ICE MAN 4
Democrats could tighten grip on California poli... 11 hr Solarman 1
Washington threatens funding cut to California,... 11 hr tomin cali 23