Irrelevant.4.4 in 8 or 6+ in 5? LMAO! You don't have a leg to stand on. Other than some skewed numbers. LMAO! Typical DIM!!!
1. Bayou twerp disputed the 76% figure because he unwittingly believed the correct percentage should be calculated from 5.6/10.0. He was caught red handed being ignorant and stupid.
2. 4.4 in 8 vs 6+ in 5 is also irrelevant. The rates of change in the debt for the last two fiscal years of Bush budgets were +5.41% and +7.51%, respectively. These were the highest rates of change since Bush's +4.90% in 2002, which was in turn the highest since Papa Bush's +3.35% in 1990. The rates of change under each fiscal year of Budgets following GW Bush's are -4.94%,-4.81%, and -0.43%. Notice the negative signs? Duh! That means Obama has managed to slow down the out of control train after Dubya handed over the controls.