BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180469 Nov 26, 2013
Slick Willie wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know what that means? I mean, do you really know what that means? If you are on Medicaid to how much you make!!! You have to be on Medicaid FIRST! And if you can afford to pay YOUR FAIR SHARE, you should be made to.
Again you cherry pick your points ..... as if you do not comprehend what they mean.
It means, Rouge, working poor not eligible for Medicaid under what were the current rules could become eligible since eligibility would be linked to poverty rather than welfare.

What do you think "to link Medicaid coverage to poverty instead of welfare" means? Eh?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>There he goes again: making up facts to suit his delusions.
Right from the Heritage plan:
"a new index of eligibility would be developed to link Medicaid coverage to poverty instead of welfare."
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180470 Nov 26, 2013
Expansion of Medicaid to working poor right from Heritage plan: "because many poor families struggling to keep off welfare currently risk enormous and uncovered medical bills because they are not eligible, or do not seek, to go on to the welfare rolls."

But a new index of eligibility linked to poverty rather than welfare means something else to the illiterate.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180471 Nov 26, 2013
WelbyMD wrote:
<quoted text>Kenyan-born Obama the Antichrist wasn't born in Hawaii. duh
Kapiolani is not Kenyan.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#180472 Nov 26, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't change the fact that they disowned the individual mandate as soon as Dems adopted it.
<quoted text>
The individual mandate is only one very small part of ObamaKare's thousands of regulations,rules,and taxes. There is nothing in ObamaKare that will reduce health care costs of health insurance costs. Most of ObamaKare has little of nothing to do with health care,it is designed to take money out of the pockets of hard working people and to control the population.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180473 Nov 26, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>The individual mandate is only one very small part of ObamaKare's thousands of regulations,rules,and taxes. There is nothing in ObamaKare that will reduce health care costs of health insurance costs. Most of ObamaKare has little of nothing to do with health care,it is designed to take money out of the pockets of hard working people and to control the population.
In Frank's mind, "they disowned the individual mandate as soon as Dems adopted it" really means "the ACA is wholly comprised of the individual mandate." Grow up Frank.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't change the fact that they disowned the individual mandate as soon as Dems adopted it.
<quoted text>
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180474 Nov 27, 2013
Here's what Heritage said:[T]the government plan would likely capture a large percentage of the insurance market, marginalizing and undermining private insurance."

That's right, the public option was so awful people would preferrentially chose it according to the conservative oracle. Perish the thought Americans would have a choice.
angel

Boise, ID

#180475 Nov 27, 2013
Dale wrote:
Well, well!! Looks like the National Socialist party finally got one of their members into the presidency.
Obama is following the same tactics as Hitler, tell lies long enough, they will become the truth.
I expect anytime to see him in a photo op wrapped in the Nazi flag.
Isnt hilarious(but kind of sad) to listen to some Tea Bag Hysteric who doesnt have the brains to realize Hitler comparisons are the biggest short cut to thinking in ANY debate?
Not to mention the sheer offensiveness of trivializing the Holocaust and the millions who died in it by equivocating their Petty, Pissy Faux Tea Bagger Angst with the sufferinging inflicted by the Third Reich.
Dispicable in their sheer banal idiocy.
angel

Boise, ID

#180476 Nov 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>The Dems never abused it like the Repubs have for the past five years. That's not hypocrisy, it's fact.
Nothing can come close to the hypocrisy of Tea Baggers.
"Those terrible Democrats!!!They broke the club weve been beating them over the head with for five years!!!!!Its Not fair!!!*snivel**Whine*"
Keep organizing and getting the word out 2014,2016 these swine need to be shut down.
angel

Boise, ID

#180477 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Ben Ghazi is not a Hindu taxi driver in NYC!
Face it.
Your never going to make a cause out of Benghazi ANYWHERE outside the Tea Bag echo chamber.
It just aint gonna happen.
Another fine example of the Right's inabilty to discern Reality from Wishful Thinking.
Obskeptic

Birmingham, MI

#180478 Nov 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>The Dems never abused it like the Repubs have for the past five years. That's not hypocrisy, it's fact.
Well golly gee then Wojar, that makes it OK, doesn't it?
Obskeptic

Birmingham, MI

#180479 Nov 27, 2013
angel wrote:
<quoted text>Nothing can come close to the hypocrisy of Tea Baggers.
"Those terrible Democrats!!!They broke the club weve been beating them over the head with for five years!!!!!Its Not fair!!!*snivel**Whine*"
Keep organizing and getting the word out 2014,2016 these swine need to be shut down.
Another great point made by the "angel". It would be a travesty if the "tea party" candidates got their way. Lower taxes, smaller government in Washington, and responsibly addressing the accumulating debt we burden our children's future with to meet todays greed and selfishness would just be a horrible thing. We better call those citizens disgusting names and demonize them so nobody would dare identify or associate with them. Is everybody with "angel" on this?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180481 Nov 27, 2013
angel wrote:
<quoted text>Nothing can come close to the hypocrisy of Tea Baggers.
"Those terrible Democrats!!!They broke the club weve been beating them over the head with for five years!!!!!Its Not fair!!!*snivel**Whine*"
Keep organizing and getting the word out 2014,2016 these swine need to be shut down.
We're hypocrites? Nixon only talked about using the IRS to get back at his enemies but Clinton did use the IRS and Obama has elevated it ten times what Clinton did.
The Republicans only talked about the "nuclear option" in the Senate but you Democrats just voted it in. Did you hear what YOUR Democrats said about the nuclear option just a few years ago?

Biden On Nuclear Option In 2005: "I Pray To God" Democrats Do Not...


Obama and Democrats on Reconciliation/Nuclear Option 2005
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

And you dare call us hypocrites? Look in the mirror!!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180482 Nov 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>The Dems never abused it like the Repubs have for the past five years. That's not hypocrisy, it's fact.
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Well golly gee then Wojar, that makes it OK, doesn't it?
Hummm, in the 1930 FDR wanted to increase the numbers of justices on the USSC above the nine just so he could stack the USSC with Progressive justices. Now Obama wants to stack the 3rd Circuit Court and for the very same reason and Wotard thinks that is okay? And he claims the Republicans are the ones who are abusing the system?!?
Frank

Spokane, WA

#180484 Nov 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
In Frank's mind, "they disowned the individual mandate as soon as Dems adopted it" really means "the ACA is wholly comprised of the individual mandate." Grow up Frank.
<quoted text>
Our country needs health care reform and it will still need health care reform in 2017.
angel

Boise, ID

#180485 Nov 27, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Another great point made by the "angel". It would be a travesty if the "tea party" candidates got their way. Lower taxes, smaller government in Washington, and responsibly addressing the accumulating debt we burden our children's future with to meet todays greed and selfishness would just be a horrible thing. We better call those citizens disgusting names and demonize them so nobody would dare identify or associate with them. Is everybody with "angel" on this?
Yeah.Thats what would happen if they got their way.
Sorry.
Theyve made it pretty clear what they are about.
Pretty much old school Fascism.
The only thing that would result is a Plutiocracy of the Rich which is exactly what the Koch's created this Astro Turf movement of the Racist Halt and Lame for in the first place.
Validating your inherant paranoia and the and mouthing half baked Libratarian platitudes is just window dressing.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180486 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>The Dems never abused it like the Repubs have for the past five years. That's not hypocrisy, it's fact.
<quoted text>
Hummm, in the 1930 FDR wanted to increase the numbers of justices on the USSC above the nine just so he could stack the USSC with Progressive justices. Now Obama wants to stack the 3rd Circuit Court and for the very same reason and Wotard thinks that is okay? And he claims the Republicans are the ones who are abusing the system?!?
Bullshit. Obama did not cause the vacancies.
angel

Boise, ID

#180487 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>The Dems never abused it like the Repubs have for the past five years. That's not hypocrisy, it's fact.
<quoted text>
Hummm, in the 1930 FDR wanted to increase the numbers of justices on the USSC above the nine just so he could stack the USSC with Progressive justices. Now Obama wants to stack the 3rd Circuit Court and for the very same reason and Wotard thinks that is okay? And he claims the Republicans are the ones who are abusing the system?!?
Right Repubs would NEVER stack the Supreme Court!Lmao!
wojar

Bristol, CT

#180488 Nov 27, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Our country needs health care reform and it will still need health care reform in 2017.
Frank thinks his reply is a rebuttal. It's not. It's whining.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
In Frank's mind, "they disowned the individual mandate as soon as Dems adopted it" really means "the ACA is wholly comprised of the individual mandate." Grow up Frank.
angel

Boise, ID

#180489 Nov 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
We're hypocrites? Nixon only talked about using the IRS to get back at his enemies but Clinton did use the IRS and Obama has elevated it ten times what Clinton did.
The Republicans only talked about the "nuclear option" in the Senate but you Democrats just voted it in. Did you hear what YOUR Democrats said about the nuclear option just a few years ago?
Biden On Nuclear Option In 2005: "I Pray To God" Democrats Do Not...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =K1Dacnvjf8AXX
Obama and Democrats on Reconciliation/Nuclear Option 2005
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
And you dare call us hypocrites? Look in the mirror!!!!
Its doubtful many anticipated taht anyone with a shred of honor or dignity would Abuse it as badly as the idealogical fanatics and nihilists have done on the Congressional Right.
Just like any Cultists they beleive their ends justify ANY means and trump ANY other priority(like the well being of this Nation.) and they have behaved accordingly.
Which is why you fools aint gettin the keys to the GOVT. back probably any time within our lifetimes.
But the fact remains that yes, you are Venal Hypocrites.
The fact that you lack the self insight required to be embarrased really isnt a surprise to anyone im sure.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#180490 Nov 27, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Another great point made by the "angel". It would be a travesty if the "tea party" candidates got their way. Lower taxes, smaller government in Washington, and responsibly addressing the accumulating debt we burden our children's future with to meet todays greed and selfishness would just be a horrible thing. We better call those citizens disgusting names and demonize them so nobody would dare identify or associate with them. Is everybody with "angel" on this?
angel wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah.Thats what would happen if they got their way.
Sorry.
Theyve made it pretty clear what they are about.
Pretty much old school Fascism.
The only thing that would result is a Plutiocracy of the Rich which is exactly what the Koch's created this Astro Turf movement of the Racist Halt and Lame for in the first place.
Validating your inherant paranoia and the and mouthing half baked Libratarian platitudes is just window dressing.
You obviously have no idea what fascism is! Big Government is Fascist and Conservatives want small, less intrusive government which is ..... anti-fascism!
Obama is the Fascists who wants to punish people if they do not agree with him. And he is using the IRS, FBI, etc. to do so. Obama is criminalizing politics!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Condoleezza Rice urges Republican party to be m... (Mar '14) 1 hr swedenforever 56
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 1 hr Joe fortuna 201,151
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 22 hr kal 49,174
female wants skype fun Tue DreamerToni326 1
Is CA drought God's punishment for Prop. 8 bein... Tue Xcaliber 1
Gay marriage (Mar '13) Tue Cali Girl 2014 56,690
The mystery of where Earth's water came from de... Tue Adrian Godsafe MSc 1
More from around the web