BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 213066 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Dale

Wichita, KS

#179481 Nov 15, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
My name is Ellen.
Re "English common law hasn't been used since 1866/68. Who told you that? It is wrong.
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
Are you claiming that you are right and that the Heritage Foundation is wrong?
More reading on the subject:
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname...
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-cit...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden...
LMAO!!! Nasty, I am claiming that Mr. Howard was right or did you forget to read that post, also!
Dale

Wichita, KS

#179482 Nov 15, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
My name is Ellen.
Re "English common law hasn't been used since 1866/68. Who told you that? It is wrong.
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
Are you claiming that you are right and that the Heritage Foundation is wrong?
More reading on the subject:
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname...
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-cit...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden...
LMAO!!! Your name is, Nasty!!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#179483 Nov 15, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Rational people, unlike yourself know I have responded to you crap time after time on the same subject.
Nasty, do something you are good at, polish some knobs in congress.
You have most definitely posted crap time after time on the same subject
Dale

Wichita, KS

#179484 Nov 15, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
No sign of play law anywhere in the referenced paragraph ... Shocking!
Toothless wonder, so you agree that Jackson was eligible to be POTUS.
Guess that subject is closed.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#179485 Nov 15, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You tell posters to get off GWB's back because , after all, hey guys, GWB's been out for 5 years and here you go again, whining about Jimmy Carter, who's been away, what, 5 years, NO, 10 years, NO, 20 years, NO, 30 years ? NO. How about 32 years and 9 months? And stop complaining about what the gov't's doing to the military and its $700 billion budget for heaven's sake. And Rogue, can't you see that a 1970s style military just won't cut it today? It's all about roadside bombs now, and suicide bombers, and drones and soon, H-bombs smuggled into containers. Try and stop that with your useless anti-missile systems ,humongous aircraft carriers, F22s and F35s and so forth.
I am comparing Obama to Jimmy Carter but if you want to compare Obama to Bush-43, okay. The military was far more prepared for further combat five years ago than it is now. We have equipment returning from Iraq and Afghanistan that is not being repaired, but set out in to lots to rust.
We have pilots, who are not piloting and their skills are getting usty and the pilots graduating from flight school are not developing their skills.
Obama toke the U.S. Enterprise out of service two years early so he could spend the money on things like birth control and Obama phones. As we speak, only half of our carrier groups are deployed or capable of being deployed on short notice. For the first time since WWII we have no carrier task force assigned to the Mediterranean Sea which could have helped out during that Ben Ghazi thing!
The F-15s have been in-service for since 1976 and they are literally falling apart.

Air Force Falls Apart While Obama Plots Even More Cuts
November 10, 2012 By Daniel Greenfield
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/air-...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#179486 Nov 15, 2013
No problem. Just fix them with 100 mph tape.

An inspection of all Air Force F-15s turned up 149 that also had thin or rough finished longerons and nine jets with cracked longerons.

Since the inspections, the Air Force has cleared most of its 420-plus F-15s to return to flight. However, Eagles with questionable longerons must be inspected more often.
http://www.airforcetimes.com/article/20080324...
Dale

Wichita, KS

#179487 Nov 15, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
You have most definitely posted crap time after time on the same subject
Toothless wonder!! Flatulence will get you no where.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#179488 Nov 15, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Toothless wonder, so you agree that Jackson was eligible to be POTUS.
Guess that subject is closed.
Of course he was - but then I don't believe in play law. I also know that Obama was / is eligible - again realizing that play law is of no value other than entertainment
Dale

Wichita, KS

#179489 Nov 15, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course he was - but then I don't believe in play law. I also know that Obama was / is eligible - again realizing that play law is of no value other than entertainment
LMAO!! I don't believe in play law either, that is why I use the intent of the framers of the Constitution and its amendments.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#179490 Nov 15, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!! I don't believe in play law either, that is why I use the intent of the framers of the Constitution and its amendments as toilet tissue.
FIFY

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#179491 Nov 15, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Yep, you really need to find out what the stipulation is to our jus soli, and of course a statute citizen is not a Natural Born Citizen, which brings us back to the 14th amendment, it only makes two types of citizen (Natural Born and Naturalized).
The United States Supreme Court, in numerous decisions, disagrees with your fantasy.

Quote Bingham all you want. The Supreme Court weighed in on 14 many times and disagrees with him, as well.

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#179492 Nov 15, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Violations of the Constitution doesn't make law or precedent.
The United States Supreme Court upheld the law many times, in fact.

You remain delusional.

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#179493 Nov 15, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
And, guess what, Bingham changed his mind. He later said that Natural Born Citizens include ALL the children born in the USA.
“Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen.” Rep. Bingham, The congressional globe, Volume 61, Part 2. pg. 2212 (1869)”
EVERY PERSON.
Don't confuse him with the truth.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#179494 Nov 15, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
FIFY
LMAO!!! Ohhh, speak to me "Great-Toothless-Wonder "!
Dale

Wichita, KS

#179495 Nov 15, 2013
ChaunceyGardiner wrote:
<quoted text>
The United States Supreme Court upheld the law many times, in fact.
You remain delusional.
Chatty Chauncey, violations of the Constitution doesn't make law or precedent.

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#179496 Nov 15, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you are a Military Intelligence puke. Isn't that an oxymoron?
I worked with you "spooks" on a few occasions and I was not impressed!
Your disdain for the military speaks volumes. It is hardly a surprise that you feel the need to malign anyone who makes you look stupid.

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#179497 Nov 15, 2013
Echo = Officer, by the way.

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#179498 Nov 15, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am comparing Obama to Jimmy Carter but if you want to compare Obama to Bush-43, okay. The military was far more prepared for further combat five years ago than it is now.
You are delusional.
We have equipment returning from Iraq and Afghanistan that is not being repaired, but set out in to lots to rust.
As mandated by protocol and policy,
We have pilots, who are not piloting and their skills are getting usty and the pilots graduating from flight school are not developing their skills.
How did we ever get through the 80s?
Obama toke the U.S. Enterprise out of service two years early so he could spend the money on things like birth control and Obama phones.
Toke? Methinks you did a bit of that before writing your post.
As we speak, only half of our carrier groups are deployed or capable of being deployed on short notice.
Operational tempo was at an all time high for the past ten years. The Navy requested down time for several of our vessels. Do your homework before looking silly.

Our air defenses and submarine fleet are the true spearhead. Mid air refueling has limited the need to conduct jumps from deck. Carriers are nice but the Joint Chiefs say we only need 11 and only several need to be deployed at any given time.
For the first time since WWII we have no carrier task force assigned to the Mediterranean Sea which could have helped out during that Ben Ghazi thing!
How so?
The F-15s have been in-service for since 1976 and they are literally falling apart.
Air Force Falls Apart While Obama Plots Even More Cuts
November 10, 2012 By Daniel Greenfield
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/air-...
Dumping it on the President is funny. The Joint Chiefs have several reduction plans in effect. Those plans were largely conceived shortly after the Cold War stalled.

We would have had more money to spend on R&D had the last President not started a war that was wholly unnecessary.

By the way, have you seen our Raptors? A couple years ago I was in Guam and saw them up close. The 22s make the 15s look like skateboards. Like the B-52 and UH-1, aircraft is not perpetually mission critical.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#179499 Nov 15, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Ohhh, speak to me "Great-Toothless-Wonder "!
I thought you were busy channeling the founders?
Dale

Wichita, KS

#179500 Nov 15, 2013
ChaunceyGardiner wrote:
<quoted text>
Your disdain for the military speaks volumes. It is hardly a surprise that you feel the need to malign anyone who makes you look stupid.
I was almost in the military, spent over 21 years in the USAF and I agree that Military Intelligence is an oxymoron.
Do you realize how many airstrikes hit nothing!(Viet-Nam)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Republicans downplay Trump rally unrest in Cali... 3 min NotSoDivineMsM 224
News Donald Trump's views on California protesters 5 min Cat74 23
News Violence follows California Trump rally, about ... 10 min Joe Fortuna 187
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 15 min Denny CranesPlace 58,810
News Jackson's mother fires first salvo to control t... (Jul '09) 41 min Sekai 5
News Donald Trumpa s bizarre California GOP conventi... 1 hr Chilli J 27
News Judge: California police targeted gays in sting... 8 hr Strange Architecture 2
More from around the web