Lesbian couple in gay marriage case p...

Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares for Supreme Court decision

There are 1581 comments on the Fox News story from Mar 24, 2013, titled Lesbian couple in gay marriage case prepares for Supreme Court decision. In it, Fox News reports that:

Big change is coming to the lives of the lesbian couple at the center of the fight for same-sex marriage in California no matter how the Supreme Court decides their case.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Fox News.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1661 May 30, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Calm down, the hissy fit makes you sensele... never mind.
I've never claimed that homosexuality is a choice
A duck doesn't 'take in water'. A person in denial does.
That is why you make general ad homoan attacks instead of trying to argue specific points.
The bottom line is simply this;
a ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile pointless gender duplicated half of marriage.
Don't even try, consider yourself b*tch slapped and READ....

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1664 May 30, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Most basic of rights?! What is that, the right to have one's personal intimate sexual relationship called marriage by the state? Can anyone do this? Is any adult intimate personal sexual relationship "marriage"? Where is the line drawn?
Justice Sonia Sotomayor brought it up while questioning former U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson, a Republican who argued that gay marriage is an individual right and should be protected by the Constitution.
"If you say that marriage is a fundamental right, what state restrictions could ever exist?" Sotomayor asked before referencing polygamy and incest among adults.
So, OohVee, care to take a stab at that question?
Typical, POS Frankie...Pick an item out, put a bigoted twirl on it and relate it to polygamy...... Olsen -'It's selecting them as a class, as you described in the Romer case and as you described in the Lawrence case and in other cases, you're picking out a group of individuals to deny them the freedom that you've said is fundamental'..

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#1666 May 30, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
Hey Rick,
You should read this article:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/30/leading...
Maybe it might help some on here who love to shove their supposed cure on Gays and Lesbians.......I bet they won't think this is okay though!!!
Thanks for the link, it's up on the news page. Let the howling begin.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#1668 May 31, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
I'm not putting words in your mouth dear, or anything else for that matter, merely giving you my meta-perspective of your efforts here. You are a seriously under-qualified heterosexual supremacist, living proof of just how silly the notion that we must kowtow to the whims of the heterosexual really is.
Ah, you continue with the ad homoan gay twirl. Can't handle addressing simple reality like this;

A ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile pointless gender duplication compared to marriage.

You excuse that denial with the assertion that reality is not only a fault of heterosexuality, but that homosexuals don't need to kowtow to it.

See how the details fit into my meta-perspective of your meta-perspective.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#1669 May 31, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Calm down, the hissy fit makes you sensele... never mind.
I've never claimed that homosexuality is a choice
A duck doesn't 'take in water'. A person in denial does.
That is why you make general ad homoan attacks instead of trying to argue specific points.
The bottom line is simply this;
a ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile pointless gender duplicated half of marriage.
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't even try, consider yourself b*tch slapped and READ....
Thanks for letting me know I was bitch slapped, otherwise I wouldn't have known...

However, none of that changes this;

A ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile pointless gender duplicated half of marriage.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1670 May 31, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Calm down, the hissy fit makes you sensele... never mind.
I've never claimed that homosexuality is a choice
A duck doesn't 'take in water'. A person in denial does.
That is why you make general ad homoan attacks instead of trying to argue specific points.
The bottom line is simply this;
a ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile pointless gender duplicated half of marriage.
<quoted text>
Thanks for letting me know I was bitch slapped, otherwise I wouldn't have known...
However, none of that changes this;
A ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile pointless gender duplicated half of marriage.
After your previous post, stating that you didn't think it was a choice.. you still put out this bigoted twirl? You're even worse than I thought..Fk off

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#1672 May 31, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
After your previous post, stating that you didn't think it was a choice.. you still put out this bigoted twirl? You're even worse than I thought..Fk off
I will when gays stop trying to impose an imposter relationship on marriage.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1673 May 31, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I will when gays stop trying to impose an imposter relationship on marriage.
The only imposter here is YOU, trying to appear human when you're really only just a piece of sh*t.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#1674 May 31, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical, POS Frankie...
Sounds like you suffer from Italiaphobia. You probably think all Italians look alike too.
Pick an item out, put a bigoted twirl on it and relate it to polygamy......
So you're a polyphobe too. Nice tactic, deflect your own bigotry by accusing other of that which you exhibit.
Olsen -'It's selecting them as a class, as you described in the Romer case and as you described in the Lawrence case and in other cases, you're picking out a group of individuals to deny them the freedom that you've said is fundamental'..
"...to deny them the freedom that you said is fundamental..."? Seriously? So asking the state to regulate one's intimate personal sexual relationship is an example of freedom?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#1675 May 31, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
The only imposter here is YOU, trying to appear human when you're really only just a piece of sh*t.
What a hateful bully.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1676 May 31, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like you suffer from Italiaphobia. You probably think all Italians look alike too.
<quoted text>
So you're a polyphobe too. Nice tactic, deflect your own bigotry by accusing other of that which you exhibit.
<quoted text>
"...to deny them the freedom that you said is fundamental..."? Seriously? So asking the state to regulate one's intimate personal sexual relationship is an example of freedom?
Gonna make up more sh*t up I see..Italians? Polyphobe? Keep going Frankie, maybe POS Kilmare will play with you..He's just a boring and stupid.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1677 May 31, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like you suffer from Italiaphobia. You probably think all Italians look alike too.
<quoted text>
So you're a polyphobe too. Nice tactic, deflect your own bigotry by accusing other of that which you exhibit.
<quoted text>
"...to deny them the freedom that you said is fundamental..."? Seriously? So asking the state to regulate one's intimate personal sexual relationship is an example of freedom?
BTW Moron, The State already regulates one's intimate personal sexual relationships..

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#1678 May 31, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Gonna make up more sh*t up I see..Italians? Polyphobe? Keep going Frankie, maybe POS Kilmare will play with you..He's just a boring and stupid.
There ya go again displaying your Italiaphobia.....all Italians look alike and post alike to you. "POS"? Point of sale? What the heck are you talking about OohVee?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#1679 May 31, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What a hateful bully.
yes, you are.

poor maligned Kimary. poor, poor kimary.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1680 May 31, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
There ya go again displaying your Italiaphobia.....all Italians look alike and post alike to you. "POS"? Point of sale? What the heck are you talking about OohVee?
Don't even try Frankie, I know it's you......Game over I'm bored..

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#1686 Aug 5, 2014
The bottom line?

The complexity of diverse gender unions, the complimentary nature of diverse gender sex and the birth of the combined DNA of that union are vastly distinct from a ss couple.

Ss marriage is an epic oxymoron and there is not one damn thing you can do about it.

Smile.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#1688 Aug 30, 2014
KiMare wrote:
The bottom line?
The complexity of diverse gender unions, the complimentary nature of diverse gender sex and the birth of the combined DNA of that union are vastly distinct from a ss couple.
Ss marriage is an epic oxymoron and there is not one damn thing you can do about it.
Smile.
Marriage equality is a reality and there's not one GD thing you can do about it.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#1689 Aug 31, 2014
The bottom line?

The complexity of diverse gender unions, the complimentary nature of diverse gender sex and the birth of the combined DNA of that union are vastly distinct from a ss couple.

Ss marriage is an epic oxymoron and there is not one damn thing you can do about it.

Smile.
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage equality is a reality and there's not one GD thing you can do about it.
I'm looking all around Dusty, even at your marrage, and all I see are inferior mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gender halves of marriage. Clearly not equal!

The only thing I see is that God damned ss marrage.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#1690 Aug 31, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage equality is a reality
"Marriage equality" is Orwellian newspeak uttered by those attempting to equate a same sex relationship with the union of husband AND wife.
and there's not one GD thing you can do about it.
It ain't over yet...not till the fat lady...SCOTUS sings!

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#1691 Aug 31, 2014
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
"Marriage equality" is Orwellian newspeak uttered by those attempting to equate a same sex relationship with the union of husband AND wife.
<quoted text>
It ain't over yet...not till the fat lady...SCOTUS sings!
No, it simply means that our marriages and families receive equal protection under the law. Not too hard to understand.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr District 1 240,886
News Treasury Chief to Congress: Raise Debt Limit Be... 7 hr Red Crosse 9
News California Democrats take aim at Trump, GOP Con... 7 hr Horace Schmitz 11
Bella Esmail Moore Wanted For FRAUD!! Iranian 9 hr Romel Esmail Wanted 2
News California takes many hits, large and small, in... 17 hr Solarman 1
How to understand mechanical aesthetics? Tue Andymolly 1
News California lawmaker pulls bill on Cold War-era ... Tue BIll 2 9
More from around the web