Hope and fear in gay marriage cases a...

Hope and fear in gay marriage cases at high court

There are 161 comments on the Athens Banner-Herald story from Dec 9, 2012, titled Hope and fear in gay marriage cases at high court. In it, Athens Banner-Herald reports that:

This Sept. 6, 2011 file photo shows opponents of gay marriage outside a courthouse in San Francisco where the California Supreme Court was hearing arguments on California's ban on same-sex marriage.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Athens Banner-Herald.

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#89 Dec 29, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The study won an award for it's scientific method.

:-)
Really???? Did that award happen to come from one of the right-wing whack-a-doodle groups that funded the "study".

You really need to differentiate between legitimate websites and fundamental anti-gay sites that support your unconventional beliefs.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#90 Dec 29, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Whine all you want. It is the largest, newest and most scientific study of all family types to date.
Your opinion is disqualified on every single level possible.
Sorry.
Smirk.
<quoted text>
You need to learn how to pose a legitimate scoff. The study won an award for it's scientific method.
Do you have any legitimate validated rebuttal, or just gay tiwrl hissy fits?
You are embarrassing to real gays...
:-)
An award given by whom? It matters, ya know.

It was dissed by the Managing Editor of the Journal that published it ... after he actually read it. lol He chalked up it's publication to the fact that the reviewing editor only scanned it.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#91 Dec 30, 2012
Kimare'a wrote;

You need to learn how to pose a legitimate scoff. The study won an award for it's scientific method.

Do you have any legitimate validated rebuttal, or just gay tiwrl hissy fits?

You are embarrassing to real gays...

:-)
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Really???? Did that award happen to come from one of the right-wing whack-a-doodle groups that funded the "study".
You really need to differentiate between legitimate websites and fundamental anti-gay sites that support your unconventional beliefs.
Why don't you post the the award source?

Oh, that would expose your smear. The ONLY response you have to any of this study.

You are so embarrassing...

:-)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#92 Dec 30, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Whine all you want. It is the largest, newest and most scientific study of all family types to date.
Your opinion is disqualified on every single level possible.
Sorry.
Smirk.
<quoted text>
You need to learn how to pose a legitimate scoff. The study won an award for it's scientific method.
Do you have any legitimate validated rebuttal, or just gay tiwrl hissy fits?
You are embarrassing to real gays...
:-)
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
An award given by whom? It matters, ya know.
It was dissed by the Managing Editor of the Journal that published it ... after he actually read it. lol He chalked up it's publication to the fact that the reviewing editor only scanned it.
1. You are confusing two different issues.

2. Again, why not post the reference, instead of your biased opinion?

Oh, I know, that brings us back to where this started... Using gay porn publications as a basis for social opinion... I bet you only read it because it was next to the ad for gay tours to visit little boys in Brazil.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#93 Dec 30, 2012
Just face it. The "study" was terminally flawed. And then move on.

Do you have any proof that allowing gay folks to legally marry will have any negative affects on, well, anything? Has it so far, anywhere it's legal.

If not, you really need to find another topic to troll.

You are just boring folks at this point.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#94 Dec 30, 2012
Quest wrote:
Just face it. The "study" was terminally flawed. And then move on.
Do you have any proof that allowing gay folks to legally marry will have any negative affects on, well, anything? Has it so far, anywhere it's legal.
If not, you really need to find another topic to troll.
You are just boring folks at this point.
Hardly honey. I still have an unanswered challenge for you to present a gay study with methodology to compare with the Regenrus study. The only one that came up was one I presented. A drastic fail by any professional measure.

As numerous articles note, the Regenrus study has been vindicated of all charges and awarded.

Aside from marriage being a cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior that you don't qualify for, marriage rights were instituted to protect mothers and children.

Two men don't need those rights or benefits. Man up!

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#95 Dec 30, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Kimare'a wrote;
Nothing of substance.
:-)
We're all aware that you've tied yourself to Regnerus's apron. You have to, because that's the one an only source that remotely supports your entire trolling act.

His latest comments on SSM and porn simply validate what the rest of us already knew; he's a whack-job.

Further, if there's a source that validates/recognizes his research methods, it's on you to post that source. The rest of us have no interest in it.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#96 Dec 30, 2012
Kimare'a wrote;

Hardly honey. I still have an unanswered challenge for you to present a gay study with methodology to compare with the Regenrus study. The only one that came up was one I presented. A drastic fail by any professional measure.

As numerous articles note, the Regenrus study has been vindicated of all charges and awarded.

Aside from marriage being a cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior that you don't qualify for, marriage rights were instituted to protect mothers and children.

Two men don't need those rights or benefits. Man up!
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
We're all aware that you've tied yourself to Regnerus's apron. You have to, because that's the one an only source that remotely supports your entire trolling act.
Pure gay twirl lies. I have accurately connected natural, adoptive, step, foster, single parenting and even the Cinderella Effect to all family situations equably.

You are the one who posted and blatantly deceptive unscientific studies. All Regenrus's study did was verify that gay situations equate to similar settings for heterosexuals with a measurably lower standard. It is simple common sense that attributes that to a missing parent and a missing gender.
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
His latest comments on SSM and porn simply validate what the rest of us already knew; he's a whack-job.
Rather than take the opinion from a gay porn magazine, why didn't you go directly to the source? Let me do it for you, and then argue your case;

http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/
2012/12/7048/
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Further, if there's a source that validates/recognizes his research methods, it's on you to post that source. The rest of us have no interest in it.
Really. When I was asking you for that regarding gay family studies, the shoe was on the other foot... Wonder why? See your slander of Regnerus.

I've referenced everything I state already. You know that. Regnerus stands as the standard with honors.

Smile.
Jane Pudenda

West New York, NJ

#97 Dec 30, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Whine all you want. It is the largest, newest and most scientific study of all family types to date.
Your opinion is disqualified on every single level possible.
Sorry.
Smirk.
No dear. Regerus' methodology is disqualified on every level. It doesn't even qualify as scientific. Claiming that children raised in a home where a parent had a one-time same sex experience does NOT qualify the children as being raised in a same sex household. That is simply misleading and fails the validity test. Period. End of story. No one can dispute that.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#98 Dec 30, 2012
"I've referenced everything I state already. You know that. Regnerus stands as the standard with honors."

This has to be the most ignorant, misinformed statement on this post!

“It's a bathroom”

Since: Jul 07

Get over it, already

#99 Dec 30, 2012
Kuntmare knows that! Zhe's just trolling.
Ray

Newport, OR

#100 Dec 30, 2012
Allowing gays to "marry" will being doing them no favors. It will just make them feel miserable because they will never be able to feel the same joy that real married couples enjoy.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#102 Dec 31, 2012
Ray wrote:
Allowing gays to "marry" will being doing them no favors. It will just make them feel miserable because they will never be able to feel the same joy that real married couples enjoy.
Gays only want to destroy the american family, as rick santorum puts it, as well as homosexualize the USA.
Jane Dough

Barre, VT

#103 Dec 31, 2012
Jane Pudenda wrote:
<quoted text>
No dear. Regerus' methodology is disqualified on every level. It doesn't even qualify as scientific. Claiming that children raised in a home where a parent had a one-time same sex experience does NOT qualify the children as being raised in a same sex household. That is simply misleading and fails the validity test. Period. End of story. No one can dispute that.
he says as he relies on other flawed studies as fact...\

those hand picked, small sample, self reporting junk science studies that you agree with are great right?

consistency is not your virtue...
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#104 Dec 31, 2012
Jane Dough wrote:
<quoted text>
he says as he relies on other flawed studies as fact...\
those hand picked, small sample, self reporting junk science studies that you agree with are great right?
consistency is not your virtue...
Remember when we both busted Rose on the "rick santorum: Gay marriage will Desintegrate the american family" thread?

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#105 Dec 31, 2012
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Gays only want to destroy the american family, as rick santorum puts it, as well as homosexualize the USA.
No, only yours...paranoid POS

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#106 Dec 31, 2012
Ray wrote:
Allowing gays to "marry" will being doing them no favors. It will just make them feel miserable because they will never be able to feel the same joy that real married couples enjoy.
Right..Bet the wifey is just over joyed to be married to a bigoted POS like you. Maybe we should reconsider you being 'allowed' to marry..
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#107 Dec 31, 2012
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
No, only yours...paranoid POS
What do you know about this eh BOY?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#108 Dec 31, 2012
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Right..Bet the wifey is just over joyed to be married to a bigoted POS like you. Maybe we should reconsider you being 'allowed' to marry..
Listen child. Marriage and love is between a man and a women, to fully admire each other and what they have in each other as human beings unique to each other. It is impossible for gays to fall in love. Foolish child.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#109 Dec 31, 2012
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you know about this eh BOY?


a lot more than you do!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 hr Well Well 240,858
News California Democrats take aim at Trump, GOP Con... 8 hr Doctor XXX 10
How to understand mechanical aesthetics? 10 hr Andymolly 1
News California lawmaker pulls bill on Cold War-era ... 21 hr BIll 2 9
News California Democratic chair race angers 'Bernie... Tue CodeTalker 10
News Essential Politics: California Democrats plot T... Mon tomin cali 3
News That gas tax hike? Ita s not enough to fix Cali... Sun C Kersey 2
More from around the web