Your posts are so full of wandering flotsam that attempting to create a coherent reply would take volumes of which you'd read the first sentence or so.<quoted text>
Then if this is valid, we can ignore all that BS about grant chasers and warmers who fly in jet planes and own yachts.
That said, on your first comment...
It's the warmists that are ever so quick to find associations to funding to "evil oil companies" as a means to debunk opponent's research, and hold their fave scientists above reproach because... uhh... err... well they are, and that's all there is to it!
Just the same I can't imagine how any recipient of pubic monies could complain about including an addendum to their papers to cite their funding sources and a spending summary, Would that not be a prudent decision?
However, you're mixing up your whines. It's the celeb promoters of global warming that are being held accountable for their non-adherence to the "science" they claim proves a "crisis".