Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 61038 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

litesong

Everett, WA

#33177 Dec 20, 2012
Pierre wrote:
The world ends in 2 days!
For the 150,000 people who died within the last 24 hours, the world already ended.
Every heartbeat is a billion trillion miracles. Ain't life wonderful.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#33178 Dec 20, 2012
Pierre wrote:
<quoted text>
The world ends in 2 days!
Can you specify a time and what to expect?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#33179 Dec 20, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. Narcotic drugs rather than oil was the stock-in-trade. Poppy fields rather than oil fields. Swire. Jardine. Matheson. Massive fortunes amassed in trading opium (and, yes - tea, silk, and other commodities).
All the hand-wringing and wailing by the oil-obsessed today fades to a yawner when viewed in an historical context. We've seen wars fought and cultures destroyed over gold, silver, diamonds, opium, pot, cocaine ... today some say it's oil, tomorrow it'll be something else.
Wow. You know more than I do about what you mentioned. Thanks much.

Now, there have been also misrepresentations like Columbus after spices.

However, there's always Iran.
Patriot

Longmont, CO

#33180 Dec 20, 2012
The Evidence - Electromagnetic Changes in our Solar System

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/12/the-evide...
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#33181 Dec 20, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Troll. Ignored.
Hay when you respond your not ignoring. Sorry you’re another one that attended the one child left behind program. So that would again make you the commander TROLL!!
Are you going for the ignorant award? Your near that position.
TrollBot

San Francisco, CA

#33182 Dec 20, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Hay when you respond your not ignoring. Sorry you’re another one that attended the one child left behind program. So that would again make you the commander TROLL!!
Are you going for the ignorant award? Your near that position.
Troll. Ignored.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#33183 Dec 21, 2012
TrollBot wrote:
<quoted text>
Troll. Ignored.
Hay when you respond your not ignoring. Sorry you’re another one that attended the one child left behind program. So that would again make you the commander TROLL!!
Are you going for the ignorant award? Your near that position.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#33184 Dec 21, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Well you are correct (I bet you never would say I would make that statement) But it's all about the money and toss in the sports thing they do well. Now that you recognize the issue you should be able to see your higher education short falls. Maybe you should start at a higher level with your education. That Pre K level thing would be a waste of time.
Actually, I did think that you would find at least one thing we could agree on. Just as litesong and I agree that ethanol in gasoline is a bad thing.

Also I will add a second degree in february and am looking at adding a third. It would only take less than a dozen courses to add the third.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#33185 Dec 21, 2012
Pierre wrote:
<quoted text>
The world ends in 2 days!
I take tha bet.
litesong

Everett, WA

#33186 Dec 21, 2012
phdudd wrote:
Your(sic) near that position.
The sun is presently 'near that position' farthest to the Earth's south, due to Earth's place in its orbit & precessional tilt.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#33187 Dec 21, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I did think that you would find at least one thing we could agree on. Just as litesong and I agree that ethanol in gasoline is a bad thing.
Also I will add a second degree in february and am looking at adding a third. It would only take less than a dozen courses to add the third.
What are some of the positives of ethanol for fuel? Saves on fossil fuels. It is an oxygenation. It increases the octane rating of gasoline without adding dangerous additives. When mixed with gasoline, it is a very good gum solvent and cleans the fuel injectors. Since it absorbs water, it dries gasoline and prevents gas line freezes. Since it is produced from growing crops, it adds much less CO2 into the atmosphere. It helps the farmers show a little more profit.

All that said, it would be better if it were produced from non food crops. Brazil is doing just fine with producing it from sugar cane.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#33188 Dec 21, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I did think that you would find at least one thing we could agree on. Just as litesong and I agree that ethanol in gasoline is a bad thing.
Also I will add a second degree in february and am looking at adding a third. It would only take less than a dozen courses to add the third.
Now if you can show all that you actually have a higher education than we would agree on would make two. At this point you are borderline high school 10th grade.
litesong

Everett, WA

#33189 Dec 21, 2012
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
What are some of the positives of ethanol for fuel? Saves on fossil fuels. It is an oxygenation.
With careful decades long records of mpg, two of our 3 cars, increased their mpg to 7 & even 8+%, when switched to 100% gasoline(ethanol-free). None of the 3 cars showed the low ethanol industry propagandistic 3% difference between 100% gasoline & 10% ethanol blends. Thousands of drivers report more mpg savings when running with 100% gasoline. As an oxygenator, ethanol decreases the pollutants of only one emission, but slightly increases the emissions of two or three other emissions. I don't care about farmers who sacrifice feeding humans to feed internal combustion engines for bigger bucks.
litesong

Everett, WA

#33190 Dec 21, 2012
Ethanol as used in present gasoline engines designed to run with 100% gasoline, does not get its best efficiency. Ethanol needs high compression engines, close to that of diesel engines, to gain its efficiency. That is why the high performance, high compression Indy cars work well with ethanol. But the 10% ethanol in 'designed for gasoline' gasoline engines misses its efficiency region.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#33191 Dec 21, 2012
litesong wrote:
Ethanol as used in present gasoline engines designed to run with 100% gasoline, does not get its best efficiency. Ethanol needs high compression engines, close to that of diesel engines, to gain its efficiency. That is why the high performance, high compression Indy cars work well with ethanol. But the 10% ethanol in 'designed for gasoline' gasoline engines misses its efficiency region.
Was that an answer from experience/knowledge or the usual cut and paste you do?
TrollBot

San Francisco, CA

#33192 Dec 21, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Hay when you respond your not ignoring. Sorry you’re another one that attended the one child left behind program. So that would again make you the commander TROLL!!
Are you going for the ignorant award? Your near that position.
Troll. Ignored.
Teddy R

San Francisco, CA

#33193 Dec 21, 2012
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
What are some of the positives of ethanol for fuel? Saves on fossil fuels. It is an oxygenation. It increases the octane rating of gasoline without adding dangerous additives. When mixed with gasoline, it is a very good gum solvent and cleans the fuel injectors. Since it absorbs water, it dries gasoline and prevents gas line freezes. Since it is produced from growing crops, it adds much less CO2 into the atmosphere. It helps the farmers show a little more profit.
All that said, it would be better if it were produced from non food crops. Brazil is doing just fine with producing it from sugar cane.
Ethanol? Terrible crappy fuel.

Corrosive.
Hygroscopic - stores poorly, goes bad quickly as it takes up water.
Did I mention corrosive?
Destroys FRP fuel tanks, e.g. in watercraft.
Lousy energy content - only 2/3 the energy content of gasoline
Lousy mpg to match
Safety hazard - when spilled and ignited, invisible flame

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#33194 Dec 21, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Ethanol? Terrible crappy fuel.
Corrosive.
Hygroscopic - stores poorly, goes bad quickly as it takes up water.
Did I mention corrosive?
Destroys FRP fuel tanks, e.g. in watercraft.
Lousy energy content - only 2/3 the energy content of gasoline
Lousy mpg to match
Safety hazard - when spilled and ignited, invisible flame
The corrosion problems have been solved. The hygroscopic property is a plus as well as a minus. Even though the energy content per gal of ethanol is less than gasoline, it is a viable energy efficient alternative. Most studies show a significant positive energy content.
http://www.ethanol.org/pdf/contentmgmt/ILSR_e...

"steel USTs have been shown to be satisfactory for storing 100 percent ethanol and E-blend gasoline (Archer Daniels Midland Co., 1998). Steel tanks have been used to store alcohols for more than 50 years without documented compatibility problems."

The tailpipe emissions of ethanol are at least as clean as petroleum gasoline and produce much less environmental CO2.

The positives and negatives will decide the future of ethanol.
litesong

Everett, WA

#33195 Dec 21, 2012
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
Even though the energy content per gal of ethanol is less than gasoline, it is a viable energy efficient alternative.
From my post above:
Ethanol needs high compression engines, close to that of diesel engines, to gain its efficiency. That is why the high performance, high compression Indy cars work well with ethanol. But the 10% ethanol in 'designed for gasoline' gasoline engines misses its efficiency region.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#33196 Dec 22, 2012
CommanderTrollBot wrote:
<quoted text>
Troll. Ignored.
Hay when you respond your not ignoring. Sorry you’re another one that attended the one child left behind program. So that would again make you the commander TROLL!!
Are you going for the ignorant award? Your near that position

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Dr Guru 222,460
News California Lawmakers Approve Extension Of Clima... 13 hr Apostate 1
News California court decision keeps teacher tenure ... 23 hr Latricia 2
GD Designs Rochdale (26) Thu august005 1
News Joe Guzzardi: UC Shows Blatant Favoritism towar... Aug 23 Dee Dee Dee 2
Youth Track & Field Teams in Los Angeles County (Oct '11) Aug 21 Queenkweli 17
News Gay marriage (Mar '13) Aug 21 In Gods we Trust 61,396
More from around the web