Bill would protect Calif. clergy from...

Bill would protect Calif. clergy from gay weddings

There are 11 comments on the KRNV-TV Reno story from Aug 28, 2012, titled Bill would protect Calif. clergy from gay weddings. In it, KRNV-TV Reno reports that:

Religious officials who do not want to perform gay weddings will not have to worry about jeopardizing their nonprofit status if a bill approved by the state Assembly becomes California law.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KRNV-TV Reno.

“WAY TO GO”

Since: Mar 11

IRELAND

#1 Aug 28, 2012
When will the media and Legislators STOP making reference to "GAY" weddings, "GAY" or "SAME-SEX" Marriages........they don't exist.....PLAIN AND SIMPLE!!!!

What they mean is Same-Sex Couples who want to get married!!!!
Gretchen

Minneapolis, MN

#2 Aug 28, 2012
Lying propaganda bull-$#!+.
Queers are viscious fascists using the power of government under their control to advance their disgusting political agenda.

To free Jerry Sandusky.
If Jerry stays in jail, the queer agenda is finished.
Gretchen

Minneapolis, MN

#3 Aug 28, 2012
RnL2008 wrote:
When will the media and Legislators STOP making reference to "GAY" weddings, "GAY" or "SAME-SEX" Marriages........they don't exist.....PLAIN AND SIMPLE!!!!
What they mean is Same-Sex Couples who want to get married!!!!
The obvious abnormalities should be pointed out, so as to comport with reality.

Homosexuals are an extremely tiny subset of sexual freaks that only have as much impact as people allow.

In the grand scheme of things, queers are pretty much less-than-worthless.
david traversa

Cordoba, Argentina

#4 Aug 28, 2012
The really important issue is: Who will protect us from the clergy? Haven't they done enough harm through millenniums now?
David Baboso

United States

#5 Aug 28, 2012
david traversa wrote:
The really important issue is: Who will protect us from the clergy? Haven't they done enough harm through millenniums now?
The really important issue is: Who will protect society from the dark specter of homosexuality?
david traversa

Cordoba, Argentina

#6 Aug 29, 2012
Gretchen wrote:
<quoted text>The obvious abnormalities should be pointed out, so as to comport with reality.
Homosexuals are an extremely tiny subset of sexual freaks that only have as much impact as people allow.
In the grand scheme of things, queers are pretty much less-than-worthless.
If you were not so pitifully ignorant you would be offensive; but, since you are, we can only feel compassion for you. It must be quite a burden. But, don't worry.. You'll always be shielded by your stupidity.
david traversa

Cordoba, Argentina

#7 Aug 29, 2012
Gretchen wrote:
Lying propaganda bull-$#!+.
Queers are viscious fascists using the power of government under their control to advance their disgusting political agenda.
To free Jerry Sandusky.
If Jerry stays in jail, the queer agenda is finished.
VICIOUS, not viscious oh you well of wisdom..
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#8 Aug 29, 2012
Gretchen wrote:
Lying propaganda bull-$#!+.
Queers are viscious fascists using the power of government under their control to advance their disgusting political agenda.
To free Jerry Sandusky.
If Jerry stays in jail, the queer agenda is finished.
This is a portion of the antigay vitriol which puzzles me. WHAT about the proposed law is "bad" if one takes into account that THIS ILK despise, hate and vomit upon gay weddings?

Not only did this poster get absolutely fucking hysterical over this article, but the article says MOST of the REPUBLICANS also voted "no," as if they DON'T want to protect the clergy.

This is the only way I can explain it:

(and step in, anyone PRO-gay, if you would like to correct me)

The republicans and antigay are *SO* antigay that the *MOMENT* they hear "gay marriage," they simply SHOUT "NO!" without even listening *to what the hell was said*. They don't hear a word and they don't process anything; it triggers a screeching "NO!" and nothing more.

This attitude is so entrenched that they vote *NO* on every bill even if it *B-E-N-E-F-I-T-S* their viewpoint.

I can find no other explanation. This is so "out of their minds" as a reaction (including the reaction of the above poster) that nothing else, to me, makes sense.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#9 Aug 29, 2012
Gretchen wrote:
<quoted text>The obvious abnormalities should be pointed out, so as to comport with reality.
Homosexuals are an extremely tiny subset of sexual freaks that only have as much impact as people allow.
In the grand scheme of things, queers are pretty much less-than-worthless.
How you must suffer, then.

They're constantly in the news; nothing you say changes their (OR PSYCHIATRY'S AND MEDICINE'S) opinion that they are just fine; therefore, everything you say comes off *exactly* as it should -- as the literal *rantings* of someone choking on their own hatred.

Never an explanation, never any logic, never any medical backup, never any proof. Just hatred -- and for some weird reason, hatred to which you must give voice *again and again*, reciting like a puppet as if you yourself must hear it repetitively.
david traversa

Cordoba, Argentina

#10 Aug 29, 2012
David Baboso wrote:
<quoted text>
The really important issue is: Who will protect society from the dark specter of homosexuality?
The really important issue is: Who will protect society from that seemingly incurable cancer, bigotry ?
David Baboso

United States

#11 Aug 29, 2012
david traversa wrote:
<quoted text>The really important issue is: Who will protect society from that seemingly incurable cancer, bigotry ?
Yes, when you have no valid argument, throw out the B-word.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Government Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News California knocks Trump as it extends climate c... 29 min non homo pheobie 1
News Mexico's Take Over Of California: Complete By 2... (Jun '09) Jul 23 Buddy Boo 27,543
News Caitlyn Jenner joins celebs mulling run for pol... Jul 21 TerriB1 3
News California may have to move 3,000 inmates at ri... (May '13) Jul 20 D Estes 8
News California lawmakers pass extension of landmark... Jul 18 Red Crosse 5
News California Democrat launches longshot bid to im... Jul 17 stop cuckers 22
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) Jul 13 John 63,930
More from around the web