Jerry Brown Global Warming Website Ta...

Jerry Brown Global Warming Website Takes On Climate Change Deniers

There are 28 comments on the The Huffington Post story from Aug 13, 2012, titled Jerry Brown Global Warming Website Takes On Climate Change Deniers. In it, The Huffington Post reports that:

Noting the occasion of the 15th annual Lake Tahoe Summit, a conference examining the environmental and developmental issues affecting the iconic alpine region straddling the California and Nevada borders, California Governor Jerry Brown announced the launch of a website dedicated to combating skeptics of climate change.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Huffington Post.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#21 Aug 19, 2012
LOLROIKWH wrote:
The troll goes after grammar again
There's feck all else to go after at this level.
Fun Facts

Huntsville, AL

#22 Aug 19, 2012
Northie wrote:
<quoted text>
Bubba, individual scientists don't generally sign joint statements. That's part of what scientific societies and academies are for.
The Oregon Petition was not such a joint statement; it was a mailed survey without any check of credentials, sent under a false flag.
Now troll on.
Most skeptics are not concerned with signatures on a list, altho publishing such a list would be interesting, if you could find one.

Most skeptics are concerned with the actual science.

If the science existed to provide evidence of man causing the warming, then you wouldn't need consensus.

The fact that you must rely on consensus, indicates you don't have the science.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#23 Aug 19, 2012
Fun Facts wrote:
I agree, the most a scientist will say is,'what I just studied didn't cause all the warming we see, so CO2 could be the reason'.
Problem is, not one singular climate function caused all of anything. Put all the various impacts of all the known climate functions together and CO2 has a hard time climbing to the top of the list.
Exactly, take away CO2 and what do we get?
Yep, continued warming until cooling sets in.
That will be the time to start worrying about how to keep warm without fossil fuel readily available.

Luckily, for those alive today, it won't affect any of them.
Fun Facts

Huntsville, AL

#24 Aug 19, 2012
Earthling-1 wrote:
<quoted text>There's feck all else to go after at this level.
Agreed.
Ralph

Bloomingdale, IN

#25 Aug 19, 2012
Fun Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
Most skeptics are not concerned with signatures on a list, altho publishing such a list would be interesting, if you could find one.
Most skeptics are concerned with the actual science.
If the science existed to provide evidence of man causing the warming, then you wouldn't need consensus.
The fact that you must rely on consensus, indicates you don't have the science.
Agreed, Could it be all of the lovely carbon taxes they want? Across the ocean where most of the manufacturing is going on, are they concerned about this? And good luck collecting taxes from them. Maybe we just want those nasty coal-fired boilers shut down so we can go back into the "dark" ages. Oh wait, THEY said it is science so no one else could possibly be right. When a politician speaks we better all listen.
Ralph

Bloomingdale, IN

#26 Aug 19, 2012
I do recomend "carbonateing" soft drinks with nitrogen, so we do not release that nasty CO2.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#27 Aug 20, 2012
Northie wrote:
<quoted text>
Bubba, individual scientists don't generally sign joint statements. That's part of what scientific societies and academies are for.
The Oregon Petition was not such a joint statement; it was a mailed survey without any check of credentials, sent under a false flag.
Now troll on.
Are you saying that scientist do write papers and present them for peer review?????
I have read many that say no proof........ROTFLMAO

It is very easy to check the credentials of the signers.......

In the last few years the number of scientist that signed it has doubled
PHD

Houston, TX

#28 Aug 20, 2012
Earthling-1 wrote:
<quoted text>That's absolutely priceless.
respectively
adverb
Singly in the order designated or mentioned
Separately or individually
In the order given
My my dirtling that's all you have. Actually I'm impressed that you understand respectively. Did you stay up all night to come up with an answer without hate and useless babble? Now that's priceless. Actually I find it interesting that you use priceless. Is the reason you choose that descriptive word because it incorporates less as in your norm useless?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Government Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 61,522
News Texas, California Separatists Attend Pro-Kremli... 9 hr Stephany McDowell 1
News California governor vetoes ban on public smokin... Tue jackbenn8 2
News Pension mess can't go on; that's no reason to i... Sep 26 donaldito 4ever 1
News California wildfire becomes costliest ever to f... Sep 20 Anonymous 1
News California Aims To Limit Surprise Medical Bills Sep 18 ENGINEERED EQUALITY 8
News California Dems Push For Obamacare For Illegal ... Sep 17 M Robbins 16
More from around the web