Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday 46,634
When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore. Full Story
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49275 Aug 7, 2014
truth-facts wrote:
<quoted text>It's called corruption for a reason.
In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that the first amendment prohibits restrictions on political spending by corporations, associations or labor unions. According to Kenneth Vogel, this is essentially what allowed American politics to be run by a few willing billionaires.

In the 2012 elections, outside groups spent $2.5 billion on campaign contributions, the first time these groups have outspent political party committees.

“It was a real milestone in the migration of money and power from the political parties to this roving band of billionaires who are able to control elections and the political policy process,” says Vogel, author of Big Money: 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp — On the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics.
LOL

United States

#49276 Aug 7, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that the first amendment prohibits restrictions on political spending by corporations, associations or labor unions. According to Kenneth Vogel, this is essentially what allowed American politics to be run by a few willing billionaires.
In the 2012 elections, outside groups spent $2.5 billion on campaign contributions, the first time these groups have outspent political party committees.
“It was a real milestone in the migration of money and power from the political parties to this roving band of billionaires who are able to control elections and the political policy process,” says Vogel, author of Big Money: 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp — On the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics.
Speaking of billionaires and their influence on politics what about Oprah Winfrey? Tom Steyer? George Soros?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49277 Aug 7, 2014
LOL wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of billionaires and their influence on politics what about Oprah Winfrey? Tom Steyer? George Soros?
No, your subject was corruption, remember?

Off-topic, duh.
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#49278 Aug 7, 2014
Updated list of 29 – Actually 30 – excuses for the 18 year ‘pause’ in global warming –‘If you can’t explain the ‘pause’, you can’t explain the cause…’
Hey GW kooks,you out there?
Can you thrill us with your genious and explain with no excuses,why we are not seeing it.
Maybe sprinkle some fairy dust so it appears.
Maybe get your wizard to wave his majic wand to make it appear.
Don't just stand there,Do SOMETHING!!!!!!!!

LMAO at you goofballs.
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#49279 Aug 7, 2014
So how's the "Global Climate Disruption Distribution of Wealth" scam going today?

Socialism is wonderful,ain't it?

NOT!!!!!!!!!!

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

#49280 Aug 7, 2014
truth-facts wrote:
So how's the "Global Climate Disruption Distribution of Wealth" scam going today?
Socialism is wonderful,ain't it?
NOT!!!!!!!!!!
Your arguments are all politics. Why don't you try a little science?
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#49281 Aug 7, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your arguments are all politics. Why don't you try a little science?
The kind of "science" that you clowns promote?
My arguments are all Politics? You should drop the Patriot AKA and just use BOZO.You are a CLOWN.
I have read numerous articles from numerous sources that make you punks look silly.
I would be embarrassed if I was a warmist because the scam is unravelling at the seams.Mother Gore laughs his way to the bank because he knows morons like you are still promoting the scam.
When you grow up and realize you've been had by a slick azz used car salesman(GORE)your going to fall on your knees and beg for mercy.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49283 Aug 7, 2014
truth-facts wrote:
<quoted text>The kind of "science" that you clowns promote?
My arguments are all Politics? You should drop the Patriot AKA and just use BOZO.You are a CLOWN.
I have read numerous articles from numerous sources that make you punks look silly.
I would be embarrassed if I was a warmist because the scam is unravelling at the seams.Mother Gore laughs his way to the bank because he knows morons like you are still promoting the scam.
When you grow up and realize you've been had by a slick azz used car salesman(GORE)your going to fall on your knees and beg for mercy.
What gives you the notion that science is studied like that?

Science builds on its foundation as it progresses. That's is how we know it is solid science, got it? Got it?
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#49284 Aug 7, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>What gives you the notion that science is studied like that?
Science builds on its foundation as it progresses. That's is how we know it is solid science, got it? Got it?
So the scientist that dispute other scientist,who by the way are considered experts,that say GW is a hoax aren't really scientist? These experts that dispute GW don't know solid science? Right?
Oh that's right they are in the pocket of the evil doers and your experts have nothing financially to gain or have never put out manipulated data or bogus graphs,naw they'd never do such a thing.That would be unethical,and we now know there has NEVER been anything UNETHICAL with the scam(wink,wink)
Are you getting this puppet?

You've been had,hoodwinked,bamboozeled,suc kered by the man. Problem is,they never indoctrinated you with common sense,did they?
What a pity.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

#49285 Aug 7, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, I listen to folks who are smarter than me. You should try it sometime. Then perhaps you wouldn't sound so stupid.
i do, son. but you're not part of that crowd. sorry. socialists are dummies.....and losers.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Chesapeake, VA

#49286 Aug 8, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your arguments are all politics. Why don't you try a little science?
That's what we've been saying to all you AGW guys for quite a while.
Embrace science instead of manipulating data and calling it science.

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

#49287 Aug 8, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>That's what we've been saying to all you AGW guys for quite a while.
Embrace science instead of manipulating data and calling it science.
Nice try, but when you base all your arguments on vapor instead of data, like you do, you are pretty ineffective. So you cherry pick a few renegade scientists who hardly ever do their own work or are sponsored by industry and disregard those who have done the real work. The radical RW's denigration of science is dangerous and will take us to darker times if allowed to prevail. When agenda is put before reality it is not healthy. Global warming is not partisan. The Earth is warming. CO2 is a GHG. Burning fossil fuels is increasing the CO2 in the atmosphere. What don't you understand?

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

#49288 Aug 8, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>i do, son. but you're not part of that crowd. sorry. socialists are dummies.....and losers.
Try broadening your horizons. Listen to someone besides Limbaugh.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#49289 Aug 8, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try, but when you base all your arguments on vapor instead of data, like you do, you are pretty ineffective. So you cherry pick a few renegade scientists who hardly ever do their own work or are sponsored by industry and disregard those who have done the real work. The radical RW's denigration of science is dangerous and will take us to darker times if allowed to prevail. When agenda is put before reality it is not healthy. Global warming is not partisan. The Earth is warming. CO2 is a GHG. Burning fossil fuels is increasing the CO2 in the atmosphere. What don't you understand?
Data? Like the CO2 you emit with every post, while bytching there should be less CO2 emissions? Data like that?

Do go on... hypocrite.

You foil yourself with every post.

And do tell us of the "agenda" of "settled science". When is 'science' ever settled in advance?

Were you capable of admitting error it would be a simple search to find all your posts regarding the 'politics' of global warming. But I'd have better luck convincing spaceballs that Mann didn't win a Nobel, that litesong is a goofball, and that captain what's his name is relevant.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#49290 Aug 8, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Try broadening your horizons. Listen to someone besides Limbaugh.
And you can prove rtm listens to Limbaugh at all? And exclusively?

Nope... you can't. But that doesn't stop you from you lame arguments.

Grow up.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Chesapeake, VA

#49291 Aug 8, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try, but when you base all your arguments on vapor instead of data, like you do, you are pretty ineffective. So you cherry pick a few renegade scientists who hardly ever do their own work or are sponsored by industry and disregard those who have done the real work. The radical RW's denigration of science is dangerous and will take us to darker times if allowed to prevail. When agenda is put before reality it is not healthy. Global warming is not partisan. The Earth is warming. CO2 is a GHG. Burning fossil fuels is increasing the CO2 in the atmosphere. What don't you understand?
Ummmm, when did I use vapor as an argument?
I used simple 5th grade science to dispute and the law of thermal dynamics to back it up.
You use falsified computer models and NO scientific method.

Nice try Pinocchio.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49292 Aug 8, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>Ummmm,''

I used simple 5th grade science to dispute and the law of thermal dynamics to back it up.
.
LOL.

You don't even know the correct name is thermodynamics. Yeah, you no-science deniers, all of you, always say the wrong inevitably.

hahahahaha
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#49293 Aug 8, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>That's what we've been saying to all you AGW guys for quite a while.
Embrace science instead of manipulating data and calling it science.
What a joke! LOL.

Listen, uncertainty analysis necessitates error analysis etc. Leave science to scientists. Their work has rules outside your understanding.

I tell you what.. don't take any medication, let any operation happen, etc if you don't accept the science.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Chesapeake, VA

#49294 Aug 8, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>What a joke! LOL.
Listen, uncertainty analysis necessitates error analysis etc. Leave science to scientists. Their work has rules outside your understanding.
I tell you what.. don't take any medication, let any operation happen, etc if you don't accept the science.
PROVE what you say!!!! You CANNOT.
Refresher for the liberal artist crowd (you spaceballs)
1-Zeroth law of thermodynamics: If two systems are in thermal equilibrium with a third system, they must be in thermal equilibrium with each other. This law helps define the notion of temperature.(Yet you claim this mysterious 3rd system that makes the other two increase which leads to the 1st law:)
2-First law of thermodynamics: Heat is a form of energy. Because energy is conserved, the internal energy of a system changes as heat flows in or out of it. Equivalently, perpetual motion machines of the first kind are impossible.(Thus proving AGW is NOT possible!)Why? Because Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It can only change forms. In any process, the total energy of the system remains the same. For a thermodynamic cycle the net heat supplied to the system equals the net work done by the system.
3-Second law of thermodynamics: The entropy of any isolated system never decreases. Such systems spontaneously evolve towards thermodynamic equilibrium — the state of maximum entropy of the system. Equivalently, perpetual motion machines of the second kind are impossible.(Did you catch the equilibrium part?)
4-Third law of thermodynamics: The entropy of a system approaches a constant value as the temperature approaches absolute zero.[2] With the exception of glasses the entropy of a system at absolute zero is typically close to zero, and is equal to the log of the multiplicity of the quantum ground state.(Not applicable in our case)

Stick to grammar and keep physics to the adults.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Chesapeake, VA

#49295 Aug 8, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>LOL.
You don't even know the correct name is thermodynamics. Yeah, you no-science deniers, all of you, always say the wrong inevitably.
hahahahaha
Just repeating what you sky is falling crowd have used.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

California Government Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 20 min KiMare 200,945
California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 5 hr brewed 5,070
Californians agree on legality path for immigrants 20 hr Go Blue Forever 12
California Takes a Stand Against Gay and Trans ... Mon Tre H 173
Crude-by-rail: One federal inspector oversees a... Sep 13 quake faults up h... 1
Calif. Lawmaker: Leadership Could Free Marine J... Sep 13 I can read 24
New Report: Offshore Fracking Threatens Califor... Sep 11 over 1
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

California Government People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••