Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,407 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#29454 Feb 22, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I will say this one more time. It has nothing to do with the questions. It's the fact that the FCC is in news media outlets in the first place that is the problem. The FCC is in control of content and having them in news rooms is a conflict of interest. The project's list of what constitutes "Critical Information Needs" is arbitrary, as it would have to be. The items include information about emergencies and risks; health and welfare; education; transportation; economic opportunities; the environment; civic information; and political information. While some aspects of each of these aspects could be considered "Critical" others certainly would not. Who decides that? Let me flip this on you. If the Republicans were in office and they were doing the same thing you would be livid (as would I) because you have called Republicans everything in the book and clearly have no love loss for them. The position you are taking on this is shortsighted and dangerous.

First of all I read the guide lines already, I know what the questions are.

OMG, what do you mean if, "republicans were in office" they are in office now and 100% behind this non issue . This is partisan politics pure and simple, nothing more.

Don't worry, Darrell Issa will be launching an investigation into it any day now, then again you might want to worry, seems after all these investigations Ole Darrell has not proved squat has he?
Reality Check

White Hall, AR

#29455 Feb 22, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all I read the guide lines already, I know what the questions are.
OMG, what do you mean if, "republicans were in office" they are in office now and 100% behind this non issue . This is partisan politics pure and simple, nothing more.
Don't worry, Darrell Issa will be launching an investigation into it any day now, then again you might want to worry, seems after all these investigations Ole Darrell has not proved squat has he?
Here we go again with the poor ole 2/3 just can't get anything done because of the mean old 1/3. That argument sailed a long time ago. Don't you have someone else you could blame? Now, if the Republicans gain control of the Senate and keep control of the House in 2014 then your argument might carry more weight. Until then, it sounds as though your just being a cry baby. It's not a non issue as much as you wish it were. I would be right there by your side if the Republicans were doing this. It's wrong in every sense.

“Frankly my dear...”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#29456 Feb 22, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Name one question from that study that gives you that idea,,,,,, just one.
The fact that it comes from your transparent hero is enough of a reason to be cautious. You know, your hero that made this line famous, "if you like your current health insurance, you can keep your current health insurance."
Knowing that the entire time he was lying through his big old lying teeth.
That's why the people question his motives. He lies.
Helengur

Pittsburgh, PA

#29457 Feb 23, 2014

How about That? its Sunday I voted in church..
Sayen

Mountain Home, AR

#29458 Feb 23, 2014
How have we, as a nation, come to this low point? We are as low right now as we have ever been. The only way we can get any lower is to have Hillary in office. She is a proven liar but people don't care. Like husband like wife.

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#29459 Feb 23, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Here we go again with the poor ole 2/3 just can't get anything done because of the mean old 1/3. That argument sailed a long time ago. Don't you have someone else you could blame? Now, if the Republicans gain control of the Senate and keep control of the House in 2014 then your argument might carry more weight. Until then, it sounds as though your just being a cry baby. It's not a non issue as much as you wish it were. I would be right there by your side if the Republicans were doing this. It's wrong in every sense.
2/3, 1/3, my ass . you're not even close, Take it for what I said, its partisan politics, its simply the right rallying their base, people like you, to get fired up about, maybe even get a campaign contribution or two out of the deal.

Bottom line its simply politics, a ploy used by both parties to get attention.
(in other words, donations)

Perhaps it would ease your mine to know that any action, or change ,to come from this type of study by the FCC has to be approved by congress before it can become a law or a directive .

So there you have it Numb Nuts, your great Left wing take over the airwaves conspiracy, would have to be approved by Congress first.

Hope that makes you feel better.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#29460 Feb 23, 2014
Sayen wrote:
How have we, as a nation, come to this low point? We are as low right now as we have ever been. The only way we can get any lower is to have Hillary in office. She is a proven liar but people don't care. Like husband like wife.
The bigger question for me is how can there be American citizens that actually think things are going good?
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#29461 Feb 23, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
2/3, 1/3, my ass . you're not even close, Take it for what I said, its partisan politics, its simply the right rallying their base, people like you, to get fired up about, maybe even get a campaign contribution or two out of the deal.
Bottom line its simply politics, a ploy used by both parties to get attention.
(in other words, donations)
Perhaps it would ease your mine to know that any action, or change ,to come from this type of study by the FCC has to be approved by congress before it can become a law or a directive .
So there you have it Numb Nuts, your great Left wing take over the airwaves conspiracy, would have to be approved by Congress first.
Hope that makes you feel better.
If you believe Obama would not try to sidestep Congress on this then you are more naïve than I thought. After changing the rules of Obamacare like he has, do you really believe he would just sit this one out and let the process run it's natural course?

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#29463 Feb 23, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
If you believe Obama would not try to sidestep Congress on this then you are more naïve than I thought. After changing the rules of Obamacare like he has, do you really believe he would just sit this one out and let the process run it's natural course?

I would like to say your not as ignorant as I think, but I can't.

Do you really think and endeavor the scope of the ACA could be fully implemented without some tweaking along the way.

It's been predicted from its inception that it would, no surprises there.

As I have told you before, if it was going to be easy the Republicans (besides Mitt), would have had this done long ago.
Amber

United States

#29465 Feb 23, 2014
Does anyone no if bruno oguinn is still seein Debbie davis
Jessica

Jonesboro, AR

#29466 Feb 23, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
2/3, 1/3, my ass . you're not even close, Take it for what I said, its partisan politics, its simply the right rallying their base, people like you, to get fired up about, maybe even get a campaign contribution or two out of the deal.
Bottom line its simply politics, a ploy used by both parties to get attention.
(in other words, donations)
Perhaps it would ease your mine to know that any action, or change ,to come from this type of study by the FCC has to be approved by congress before it can become a law or a directive .
So there you have it Numb Nuts, your great Left wing take over the airwaves conspiracy, would have to be approved by Congress first.
Hope that makes you feel better.
2/3, 1/3, Hecht even you know that you are a half ass
Jessica

Jonesboro, AR

#29467 Feb 23, 2014
Amber wrote:
Does anyone no if bruno oguinn is still seein Debbie davis
Yes, someone does know
Cooter Brown

Mountain Home, AR

#29468 Feb 24, 2014
Jessica wrote:
<quoted text>
2/3, 1/3, Hecht even you know that you are a half ass
Could be worse if they were like you, a dumb ass thinking he is a smart ass.
Jessica

Memphis, TN

#29469 Feb 24, 2014
Cooter Brown wrote:
<quoted text>
Could be worse if they were like you, a dumb ass thinking he is a smart ass.
I don't think he is a smart ass, I know that he is a dumb ass. Why is it that all of Barney supporters live in the general vicinity of Salem?

“Frankly my dear...”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#29470 Feb 24, 2014
Jessica wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think he is a smart ass, I know that he is a dumb ass. Why is it that all of Barney supporters live in the general vicinity of Salem?
And why do those supporters inevitably have the name of a color and can almost certainly can be found pulling into any county fair behind the wheel of a car called the
'General Lee'?
any one

Ashburn, VA

#29471 Feb 24, 2014
Amber wrote:
Does anyone no if bruno oguinn is still seein Debbie davis
Yes, I no.
Reality Check

Camden, AR

#29472 Feb 25, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I would like to say your not as ignorant as I think, but I can't.
Do you really think and endeavor the scope of the ACA could be fully implemented without some tweaking along the way.
It's been predicted from its inception that it would, no surprises there.
As I have told you before, if it was going to be easy the Republicans (besides Mitt), would have had this done long ago.
Tweaking? Is that what they call trampling the Constitution now a days?

Since: Dec 10

Kansas City Ks.

#29473 Feb 25, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
Tweaking? Is that what they call trampling the Constitution now a days?
Evidently that is what a narrow minded Right winger would call it, I would say very few others would make such a ridiculous statement.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#29474 Feb 25, 2014
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Evidently that is what a narrow minded Right winger would call it, I would say very few others would make such a ridiculous statement.
Keep telling yourself that.
Trampled

United States

#29475 Feb 25, 2014
Trampling is exactly what Owebama is doing to the constitution, and only an imbecile would defend him.
Barney can't be in the richest percentage because he whines about their success.
He can't be 'middle America' because he would be feeling the pinch from Owebama's grip.
Therefore, he must be a bottom of the barrel moocher, living off the fat of taxpayers.
Of course the free loader sings Owebama's praises! It's probably steak and lobster night in Salem, and Barney's trailer park's done got the coals on the grill and the caviar on da Ritz!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Arkansas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) Sat ChristineM 21,863
News Obama administration calls for end to corporal ... Sat guest 21
News 2016ers weigh in on Trump's 'blood' comment (Aug '15) Dec 1 Geezer files 449
Haunted Places in Fort Smith, AR area (Oct '10) Nov 22 LOOK AT THIS PLZ 41
Ty Rodgers Nov 22 Jon 1
Batsville Nov 16 guest 1
News Arkansas youth hunters harvest nearly 9,500 deer Nov 10 Jimmy 7
More from around the web