Did you vote today?

Did you vote today?

Created by Rick on Jun 8, 2010

6,300 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

weinerman

Ozark, AR

#24266 Apr 3, 2013
Today was a beautiful day. the Lord heard my prayers and answered them. With a beautiful day a day off rose colored glasses. Life as free as a butterfly. Oh happy day oh happy day.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24267 Apr 4, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Do they even have cable TV in Salem?
I would say yes.

http://www.cabletv.com/ar/salem

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24268 Apr 4, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
It's because the inevitable reality of Obama's failed ideology is beginning to show itself. Liberals like Barney are beginning to realize that Obama is just a big lie. The fantasy that was a socialism eutopia is melting away and all that's left is the ugly reality of what it's going to take to make that "eutopia" happen. That reality is a massive set of taxes that's going to hit the middle class far heavier than it hits the upper class. Liberals have bet the farm on a lie that the VERY few upper class in this nation had enough money to not only support the running of our reckless and out of control government but also give substantial amounts of money to the "less fortunate" to improve their lives. They are feeling like fools for believing such a complete lie. I wish they had listened back in 2008. Now we get to see if they can swallow their pride and do the right thing starting in 2014 and again in 2016 to begin to set things right. I just know it will take a whole lot longer to build this country up than it did to tear it down.
2014 is not looking to good for the GOP at this point in time.

According to a Quinnipiac poll released today, if the election were held today 43 percent of the electorate would support a Democratic U.S. House candidate, as opposed to just 35 percent who would back a Republican. That 8 point lead for Democrats is significantly more than the GOPís margin of victory during the 2010 Republican wave election (6.6 percent) and even more that the Democratic margin of victory during the 2006 wave (7.9 percent)ó when Democrats were bolstered by both an unpopular Republican president and a failing war in Iraq.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#24269 Apr 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I would say yes.
http://www.cabletv.com/ar/salem
That explains it!
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#24270 Apr 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
2014 is not looking to good for the GOP at this point in time.
According to a Quinnipiac poll released today, if the election were held today 43 percent of the electorate would support a Democratic U.S. House candidate, as opposed to just 35 percent who would back a Republican. That 8 point lead for Democrats is significantly more than the GOPís margin of victory during the 2010 Republican wave election (6.6 percent) and even more that the Democratic margin of victory during the 2006 wave (7.9 percent)ó when Democrats were bolstered by both an unpopular Republican president and a failing war in Iraq.
2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and beyond is not looking to good for the AMERICAN PEOPLE. The difference between the Republicans and the democrats is, the democrats only worry about themselves, they are self serving and will do anything and I mean anything even if it is immoral and illegal to stay in power. democrats keep their flock dumb and poor so they can count on their votes decade after decade. The Republicans care about ALL the people of this country and want the best for EVERYBODY. Republicans have solid core values and morals and that will be their down fall in the end..
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#24271 Apr 4, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>If you are democrat and rail against the Republicans because they are rich and successful wouldn't you want your kids to grow up as Republicans or would you want them to stay poor and democrat?
No because they would rather teach their kids how to rally the poor and middle class against the rich. That way the they can steal the poor and middle class' money and have those, who's money is being stolen, root the liberals on all the way. The poor and middle class is so focused on hurting people they don't even know, who have done well for themselves, that they don't even realize their money is being used to make the liberal democrats into the very type of person that has been demonized. You would think that as much as the poor and middle class focus on how little money they have that they would realize what's being done to them but they don't.
Reality Check

Lonoke, AR

#24272 Apr 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
2014 is not looking to good for the GOP at this point in time.
According to a Quinnipiac poll released today, if the election were held today 43 percent of the electorate would support a Democratic U.S. House candidate, as opposed to just 35 percent who would back a Republican. That 8 point lead for Democrats is significantly more than the GOPís margin of victory during the 2010 Republican wave election (6.6 percent) and even more that the Democratic margin of victory during the 2006 wave (7.9 percent)ó when Democrats were bolstered by both an unpopular Republican president and a failing war in Iraq.
I'm afraid your right and I rarely feel that way. Don't put your faith in polls. If I polled 100 KKK members, what do you think Obama's approval rating would be? You can make a poll say anything you want and, in today's political climate, there is more of that going on than at any time in history. The two parties used to disagree but could come together and do what's best in America's interest but now the dislike is so strong that neither side is willing to come off of their positions to work things out.
guest

Blytheville, AR

#24273 Apr 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
Let that silly notion bring you cheer!!
It give me a good laugh, thanks.
Thanks for proving my point again.
guest

Blytheville, AR

#24274 Apr 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
2014 is not looking to good for the GOP at this point in time.
According to a Quinnipiac poll released today, if the election were held today 43 percent of the electorate would support a Democratic U.S. House candidate, as opposed to just 35 percent who would back a Republican. That 8 point lead for Democrats is significantly more than the GOPís margin of victory during the 2010 Republican wave election (6.6 percent) and even more that the Democratic margin of victory during the 2006 wave (7.9 percent)ó when Democrats were bolstered by both an unpopular Republican president and a failing war in Iraq.
I didn't realize that democrats already started early voting for the 2014 election?
guest

Blytheville, AR

#24275 Apr 4, 2013
WARRIOR wrote:
<quoted text>Do they even have cable TV in Salem?
BARNEYII has issues with cable TV schedules. He actually tried to spread the lie FOX News is banned in Cananda. And he wonders why we know he is a liar.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24276 Apr 4, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm afraid your right and I rarely feel that way. Don't put your faith in polls. If I polled 100 KKK members, what do you think Obama's approval rating would be?

I would bet the results of your poll would favor this Rasmussen Report.

A polling agency with a reputation of Right Wing bias.


The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove.



Let's say the above report is off 3%, that would put the president about 53%.

SHOCKING- The President won reelection with about 53% of the poplar vote.

WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#24277 Apr 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I would bet the results of your poll would favor this Rasmussen Report.
A polling agency with a reputation of Right Wing bias.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove.
Let's say the above report is off 3%, that would put the president about 53%.
SHOCKING- The President won reelection with about 53% of the poplar vote.
LMAO! 3% could put it at 52% disapprove also. If democraps didn't cast 6 votes per person Obama would have lost in a landslide. Look at all the voter fraud you democrats have already admittted to. You should be real proud.....
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#24278 Apr 4, 2013
I hope none of you Libtards have cancer or get it any time soon!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#24279 Apr 4, 2013

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#24280 Apr 4, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>BARNEYII has issues with cable TV schedules. He actually tried to spread the lie FOX News is banned in Cananda. And he wonders why we know he is a liar.
How many Canadian channels carried Fox before 2004?

Fox had been broadcasting for eight years in 04, why was Fox not broadcasting in Canada?
..........

In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada .

Only in 2004 did Fox get Lic. to broadcast in Canada.
what

Conway, AR

#24281 Apr 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
I would bet the results of your poll would favor this Rasmussen Report.
A polling agency with a reputation of Right Wing bias.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove.
Let's say the above report is off 3%, that would put the president about 53%.
SHOCKING- The President won reelection with about 53% of the poplar vote.
You think the KKK would give Obama a 50% approval rating???

Just when we thought you couldn't get any dumber, you go and reach an even lower level of stupidity.
Vote

United States

#24282 Apr 4, 2013
Everyone should
liberalsareliars

Conway, AR

#24283 Apr 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
How many Canadian channels carried Fox before 2004?
Fox had been broadcasting for eight years in 04, why was Fox not broadcasting in Canada?
..........
In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada .
Only in 2004 did Fox get Lic. to broadcast in Canada.
http://www.snopes.com/politics /business/foxcanada.asp
Why don't you finish the statement and tells us why they were rejectede? I'll do it for you:
n 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada due to concerns Fox News U.S. and Global Television were planning to create a combined American-Canadian news network. In 2004, after a Fox U.S. executive said there were no plans to create the combined channel, the CRTC approved an application to bring Fox News to Canada.[84]http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel

Fox has never been "banned" in Canada.
You are deceitful idiot.
what

Conway, AR

#24284 Apr 4, 2013
liberalsareliars wrote:
<quoted text> http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/foxca...
Why don't you finish the statement and tells us why they were rejectede? I'll do it for you:
n 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada due to concerns Fox News U.S. and Global Television were planning to create a combined American-Canadian news network. In 2004, after a Fox U.S. executive said there were no plans to create the combined channel, the CRTC approved an application to bring Fox News to Canada.[84]http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel
Fox has never been "banned" in Canada.
You are deceitful idiot.
Just wait for his response. It will be even more deceitfull and twice as idiotic.
WARRIOR

Alamogordo, NM

#24285 Apr 4, 2013
BARNEYII wrote:
<quoted text>
How many Canadian channels carried Fox before 2004?
Fox had been broadcasting for eight years in 04, why was Fox not broadcasting in Canada?
..........
In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada .
Only in 2004 did Fox get Lic. to broadcast in Canada.
Eat it!

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/politics/repor...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Arkansas Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 5 min Mr_SKY 12,672
News 2016ers weigh in on Trump's 'blood' comment Sun Le Jimbo 443
News Names of 2 legislators, ex-justice on users list Fri Srilaura 3
News Trump's lead grows as Bush slips in Republican ... Aug 28 Ho Dee Doo 13
What Happened to Morgan Nick of Alma, Arkansas? (Jun '07) Aug 24 Carla Jones 51
News Poll: GOP Establishment Candidates Falling Aug 20 An NFL Fan 57
NATIVE Garens Aug 18 PAUL SHYKORA arts 1
More from around the web