Those that are willing to give up freedom for security deserve neither.Those that choose safety over freedom deserve neither...or something like that
Join the discussion below, or Read more at WOOD-TV Grand Rapids and Michigan.
#461 Nov 29, 2008
“Uzi Does It”
Since: Nov 08
#462 Nov 29, 2008
go to www.subguns.com click on "message boards", then click on "moderated discussion board", then post your message there...someone with experience will be glad to reply to your post. I have no experience with 9MM conversions for AR15, but I'm sure there are many over at suguns that do.
#463 Nov 29, 2008
Think I will. I have about every other gadget I carry on it, except the ACOG, which is next, although to be honest, I do not like the eye relief on it, I prefer the open eye EOTEC.
What kinds of guns do you have? I am an WWI WWII collector who hunts a lot.
Lee Enfield SMLE No1MkIII*(1915)
Lee Enfield Jungle Carbine (1932)
Springfield 1903a3 (1934)
M1 Garand (1944)
Schmitt Rubin Straight Pull 1911 Carbine (1917)
Remington Model 8 (1908) Yes, 100
Winchester Model 94 Wide Ring .44 (1995)
Winchester Model 94 Black Shadow .444 (1999)
Winchester Model 1300 Marine Stainless (1990)
Benelli Nova Tactical (2006)
Winchester Model 70 XLT Featherweight (1992)
CVA Aristocrat.223 Single shot Heavy Barrel (1987)
next one is going to be the M-14, preferably the SOCOM setup....
#464 Nov 29, 2008
10:40 PM Pink Floyd " Dark Side of the Moon" on WGVU
#465 Nov 29, 2008
Sosilist...er i mean liberal propaganda.
the libs hate guns because they can't rule over an armed citizenry.
Now..some lib is going to report this post to get it removed, true to nature of liberalism
“Uzi Does It”
Since: Nov 08
#466 Nov 29, 2008
I kind of figured that if you didn't have a Springfield M1A in your collection, you'd be thinking of getting one.
Nice collection by the way.
I was collecting the more recent military style rifles since the late 1980's and have had many AR15s, some Colt and some I built up from after market lower receivers and surplus parts.
I still have a Colt H-Bar, a registered Short Barreled Rifle on a Grizzly L.A.R. 15 lower, a 1994 AWB configured AR15 on Pacific West Arms lower. After that a gaggle of .308 main battle rifles, one is a pristine pre-1989 SAR48, the other two are post-1994 ban configured G3 variants.
1 IMI Mini Uzi carbine 9mm pre-1989
1 Armalite 180 pre-1989 from England
1 Russian Tula armory refurb SKS
1 Yugoslavian M92 Krinkov post-2004
3 registered silencers (9MM,.223,.22LR)
2 transferable sub guns pre-1986 (.45ACP and 9mm)
1 regestered SBS that is a Remington 1100 with a ported 14" barrel and Wilson Combat sights
1 10" registered A.O.W. that was governemnt contract over-run door breacher Remington 870LM modular combat shotgun
1 USP .40 cal
1 Walther P22
1 US Govt style Springield Armory 1911 in .45ACP
#467 Nov 30, 2008
Nice collection you got brewing there too!
ahh the 1911, does it get better? ahhhh
#468 Dec 9, 2008
Kimber team match 45 acp
Colt 45 acp
Reminton rand 1943 45 acp
1942 byf luger
smith wesson 38 air weight
smith wesson 357 626
springfield XD 9mm
browning buckmark target 22
springfield m1 garand 1942
springfield m1 garand 1945
RRA AR 15
inland M1 carbine
rem 700 06
rem 870 12 ga
I Don't hunt, just compete.
“Shall NOT be infringed.”
Since: Dec 06
#469 Dec 9, 2008
Would highly recommend not revealing what you may own. ISP's can be tracked and the government, (as well as other thieves), could take advantage of the knowledge....
“Tu ne cede malis”
Since: Dec 06
Lots of different places
#470 Dec 10, 2008
#471 Dec 11, 2008
I remember that post.I might enjoy watching them raid Starbucks with the Pink Panther Squad.Why not, thats where they are now!
I can say safely say that I am pretty sure they know what I got and where I got it. The government that is, as for theives, bring a forklift and a welding torch, and a few days worth of food.....It will be a long wekend.
#472 Dec 11, 2008
or the ISP at the public library or the one at some hotel with wifi.
#473 Nov 16, 2012
I have to agree with you. At the Aurora theater shooting, a man killed 12 people and injured 58 more. This could of had a happier ending if the 4 marines that were present were carrying their side arms. I feel they would have had a better chance at their attempt to subdue him if they were armed as well. Gun laws do almost nothing to help keep people safe. The only people who follow them are upstanding citizens. If someone wants to commit a heinous crime they will. No law is going to stop them. The crime itself is against the law. What would make them follow one law hindering them from breaking another? No argument anyone makes for tougher gun laws will effect the simple logic in this.
Add your comments below
|Majority of Americans do not want Syrian refuge...||Sun||Ritual Habitual||1|
|Paris climate talks: Tens of billions promised ...||Sun||Follow The Money||1|
|Home sales climb 2% in October (Nov '12)||Nov 26||aleslah||28|
|Was it caution or Islamaphobia that resulted in...||Nov 24||dartgame||11|
|Robert F. Jakubowicz: Deep roots of coffee cup ...||Nov 23||Christaliban||5|
|Abedin Email: Hillary Clinton 'Often Confu...||Nov 23||Shinichiro Takizawa||29|
|Dunkin' Donuts Holiday Cup Doesn't Shy From Chr...||Nov 23||Ritual Habitual||1|
Find what you want!
Search Startups Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC