Lance Armstrong "hanging with" family after USADA report hits
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.
“DRILL FOR OIL?, "YES WE CAN"”
Since: Jul 08
#1 Oct 11, 2012
I see it as sore losers, he won alot and he MUST be cheating, railroaded in my opinion, those other losers are just that, a bunch of whining losers.!
“It's Time to Defeat Terrorism ”
Since: May 11
#2 Oct 11, 2012
Undoubtedly, the Obama's American hating regime of Maoists and czars found good way to spend millions of dollars of the American people tax money to destroy American icon Lance Armstrong with no proof whatsoever. The attack on America by the Obama regime is typical of socialistic regimes that fight the ''rich' and 'successful'. The report of the Obama regime did not specify what was the illegal 'drug' that Lance Armstrong used since 1998. The report denied the fact that Lance Armstrong was tested successfully more than 500 times for using illegal drugs since 1998. The self destruction of America by the Obama who represent the foreign anti-American agenda of the Mozlem Brother and communists know not limits or boundary in wasting our money for our self destruction of America and its icons.
#3 Oct 11, 2012
genuine comedy gold
#4 Oct 12, 2012
Try reading the file and look up who is the notary public on LL statement then look up her partner and see who he is the attorny to. It reeks.
All info to 2006 in the bin as been done and cleared. All post 2006 Ok but needs to stand up ie re comments above.
Physical evidence none apart from expert witness and you get your won to say thats wrong.
+8 years inadmissable despite USADA big hoo haa it was valid, it actually may open the legal door to LA.
USADA stated before the opportunity of a hearing under WADC rules his constitutional rights are superseded by WADC rules. Now they are citing US Law (not state or federal but US Law which is?) to glue the post 8 years on while Article 17 of WADC states quite clearly and without deviation 8 years only. US Law is not admissable under WADC rules or in Swiss Law.
The above means that USADA could be cited as not disclosing access to defence under US Law they were seeking and opening constitutional rights.
USADA also went to town on UCI as covering up test but no mention what gives ther?
They cheated and in US it appears to be WHAT its not just LA its amazing and so naive.
I said before USADA were working outside its remit and there it has been shown.
We shall see what UCI do but IOC have already said there is no basis under which they can strip the bronze won in 2003.
So who has been lying? EVERYONE!
Add your comments below
|UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10)||5 hr||WillPhart||33,724|
|Ranking the 10 Most Trusted Defensemen in the NHL (Dec '16)||9 hr||ShutPhartse||11|
|No. 1 WVU women's soccer home opener is Thursday||10 hr||Home phart||2|
|Carson Wentz, Jay Cutler headline joint practic...||15 hr||Pants phartzs||4|
|Group of Cleveland Browns' players take knee du...||15 hr||His phartzs||17|
|Pennsylvania paper calls for Maddon to apologiz...||Tue||Soil phart||10|
|SpyGate Was Also a Minor Scandal||Tue||OwnersPharts||4|
Find what you want!
Search Sports Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC