Advertisment
 

Join the Topix community today: 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Grand Rapids, MI

May 8, 2008

What's in the stormwater?

“If everybody did what Grand Rapids is doing, our waterways would be in a lot better shape.”

How clean is the water in the river, lake, or stream near you? It may be more contaminated than you realize. via WZZM-TV Grand Rapids

Read All 12 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 12 of 12
jtphantom
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
May 8, 2008
 
Grand Rapids knows this is an issue and has supposedly been dealing with it for years.

I had inquired to the DEQ about two years ago and that was basically the answer I received.

If they had chosen to create a separate storm water system from that of the sewer this could be averted. Maybe.

“My lil buddy”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008
Comments: 3917
Holland,MI
ISP Location: Holland, MI
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
May 8, 2008
 
When Grand Rapids put in the combined sewer system it was state of the art, one of the first cities to even have a sewer system. Now, having been progressive at the time is costing them. Replacing it with a separated sewer system has not been easy or cheap. Correcting it has meant digging up and removing the old combined system and then installing new separate storm and sanitary sewers while continuing to provide sewer service.

“Ban Fluoridation”

Joined: Dec 17, 2005
Comments: 447
New York
ISP Location: Levittown, NY
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
May 9, 2008
 
A very easy way to stop the flow of chemicals into the water ways is for Grand Rapids to stop adding unnecessary hydrofluosilicic acid into the water supplies in the first place.

Often this acid has to be neutralized with yet another chemical such as sodium hydroxide. Grand Rapids adds hydrofluosilicic acid (fluoride )into the water supply in a failed effort to reduce tooth decay. Only 1% of the water supply is consumed. 99% of this hydrofluosilicic acid, which also contains trace amounts of lead, arsenic, mercury and other toxins, gets back into your environment.

It's a no brainer to stop fluoridation. It saves money, health and has no down side as studies show when fluoridation ends, cavities actually go down.

However, the politics of fluoridation and the power of the American Dental Association, funded by corporations who benefit by keeping fluoride as the protected pollutant, is a hard force to beat down.

Good Luck

“My lil buddy”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008
Comments: 3917
Holland,MI
ISP Location: Holland, MI
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
May 9, 2008
 
nyscof wrote:
A very easy way to stop the flow of chemicals into the water ways is for Grand Rapids to stop adding unnecessary hydrofluosilicic acid into the water supplies in the first place.
Often this acid has to be neutralized with yet another chemical such as sodium hydroxide. Grand Rapids adds hydrofluosilicic acid (fluoride )into the water supply in a failed effort to reduce tooth decay. Only 1% of the water supply is consumed. 99% of this hydrofluosilicic acid, which also contains trace amounts of lead, arsenic, mercury and other toxins, gets back into your environment.
It's a no brainer to stop fluoridation. It saves money, health and has no down side as studies show when fluoridation ends, cavities actually go down.
However, the politics of fluoridation and the power of the American Dental Association, funded by corporations who benefit by keeping fluoride as the protected pollutant, is a hard force to beat down.
Good Luck
What does this political rant have to do with stormwater? Incidentally, flouride occurs naturally in our water.

“Old Baldy”

Joined: Oct 1, 2007
Comments: 1616
Big Rapids
ISP Location: Middleville, MI
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
May 9, 2008
 
I'm thinking that real quickly, a whole lot more cigarette b.utts once the ban kicks in.

“My lil buddy”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008
Comments: 3917
Holland,MI
ISP Location: Holland, MI
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
May 9, 2008
 
BR Bean Counter wrote:
I'm thinking that real quickly, a whole lot more cigarette b.utts once the ban kicks in.
The screen at the wastewater plant will catch many, if not most of them along with the used kotex.

“Old Baldy”

Joined: Oct 1, 2007
Comments: 1616
Big Rapids
ISP Location: Middleville, MI
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
May 9, 2008
 
Gentle Taz wrote:
<quoted text>
The screen at the wastewater plant will catch many, if not most of them along with the used kotex.
Not after an inch of rain!

“My lil buddy”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008
Comments: 3917
Holland,MI
ISP Location: Holland, MI
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
May 9, 2008
 
BR Bean Counter wrote:
<quoted text>
Not after an inch of rain!
Then it will most likely end up in the overflow basin! Or, if that inch comes down fast enough, into the Grand.

“Ban Fluoridation”

Joined: Dec 17, 2005
Comments: 447
New York
ISP Location: Levittown, NY
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
May 10, 2008
 
Gentle Taz wrote:
<quoted text>
Incidentally, flouride occurs naturally in our water.
The fluoride that's added to your water is
NOT there naturally. Silicofluorides are toxin-laced waste scrubbed from the smokestacks of phosphate fertilizer plants and dumped unpurified into your drinking water. This you pay for both in dollars and adverse health effects.

“My lil buddy”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008
Comments: 3917
Holland,MI
ISP Location: Holland, MI
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
May 10, 2008
 
nyscof wrote:
<quoted text>
The fluoride that's added to your water is
NOT there naturally. Silicofluorides are toxin-laced waste scrubbed from the smokestacks of phosphate fertilizer plants and dumped unpurified into your drinking water. This you pay for both in dollars and adverse health effects.
If you do a test on raw Lake Michigan water, you will find that it contains about 3/10 of a part per million flouride. Well water, in many places contains even more. The city of Grand Rapids only feeds enough flouride to bring the level up to the recommended 1 part per million, as do all water departments that feed flouride.

“My lil buddy”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008
Comments: 3917
Holland,MI
ISP Location: Holland, MI
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
May 10, 2008
 
nyscof wrote:
<quoted text>
The fluoride that's added to your water is
NOT there naturally. Silicofluorides are toxin-laced waste scrubbed from the smokestacks of phosphate fertilizer plants and dumped unpurified into your drinking water. This you pay for both in dollars and adverse health effects.
By the way, what does that have to do with storm water? Storm water is what comes out of the sky, commonly known as rain. I don't know of any way to add flouride to the rain as it falls.

“Ban Fluoridation”

Joined: Dec 17, 2005
Comments: 447
New York
ISP Location: Levittown, NY
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
May 10, 2008
 
Actually, the article says, "All sorts of chemicals are being put on crops, our yards. And washed into our storm drains.'"

Lead, arsenic and mercury laced silicofluorides are sprinkled on crops and lawns then washed into storm drains. That's what fluoridation has to do with storm water runoff.
Showing posts 1 - 12 of 12
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Grand Rapids Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
157 pot plants, weapons seized at GR Twp home 1 hr Wyoming Mom 85
2 Ionia toddlers fall from window 1 hr Starlight 112
Officer hit by SUV; manhunt continues for suspect 2 hr no quarterba... 117
2 Ionia toddlers fall from window 3 hr lisa 4
GR Starbucks employee firing triggers global pr... 3 hr Seenitbefore 206
Servaas accuser under scrutiny 4 hr A concerned ... 138
Developers now control 50+ properties in GR nei... 4 hr Pete 126