Driver arrested with drugs, gun, 1-year-old child in car

Pat Kittle wrote:

<quoted text>
Then you better actively demand serious immigration control -- starting with ending our treasonous "sanctuary city" idiocy.
Don't let these criminal illegal aliens and their anchor babies demoralize you into submission -- that's exactly what they hope to do.

Pat, IMHO the term Alien doesn't need the legal/illegal modification.

For most of America's history it was White and European, and it only began to go downhill once the 1965 Hart-Cellar immigration act drastically changed the rules.

The early 1920's immigration act had preserved the White European Gentile character of America, so it's identity wasn't subject to radical change. The 1965 turned that on its head, with preferences for non-White ethnicities rather than the White European Gentile demographic.

It's been known for at least two thousand years that putting different races/ethnicities under one national umbrella leads to inevitable conflict.

It doesn't matter whether they are "legal" or "illegal". Unassimilable groups allowed to colonize a relatively homogeneous nation are always "outsiders". If they gain enough population to affect the political structure, a nation destabilizes and eventually falls apart.

This is what we are now witnessing .... but few are willing to admit it.

People use the "illegal" term so they can avoid being called "racists". This term was invented to demoralize White Peoples into allowing their space to be colonized and themselves replaced in the spaces they created. This is why "anti-racism" is actually anti-White.

"Legal" or "illegal" status doesn't matter: race-replacement is Genocide no matter what you call it.

Frankie wrote:

<quoted text>
"Neanderthal" genetics is strewn throughout White European peoples.

Well Frankkk, it hasn't been completely proven yet, but I must admit that you do make a very compelling case for it.

ouch wrote:

I knew they had scanners, they disappear before police show up.

This is what I suspect the meth dealer/cooker in my apartment complex uses.

john doe wrote:

<quoted text>
Possession of a police scanner, while engaged in a crime is also against the law. Why doesn't our stupid DA's office file the additional charge? This is one law that's rarely enforced; so a lot of dirt bags use these radios. Last time, I heard, it was a meth pusher in Aptos, who was caught with a police scanner about two years ago.
I know of a website, which reports every use of a police scanner by the criminals. It's far more common than you might think on a state-wide and national basis. And it's time to enforce that law referred to in the owners manuals...

I totally agree. Thank you for posting the information it is very helpful.
The local meth dealer/cooker in my apartment complex has something that sounds like one, too.
This might be how they have evaded arrest so far.

SC midtown: How do ya know the baby is okay???

Devoluted wrote:

<quoted text>
Well Frankkk, it hasn't been completely proven yet, but I must admit that you do make a very compelling case for it.

Well "Devoluted", evidence is rolling in that Neanderthal DNA is actually concentrated in a pseudo-European Tribe which is a mix of "Arab" and "Khazar" subtribes of the caucasoid peoples. I have a feeling you're very familiar with that Tribe.

But you don't hear much about that because it's not "Good for the Neanderthals" to talk about it, eh?

realitybytes wrote:

A woman picked up the daughter? I think CPS should have taken her away for good! This is bull$#1T !

Wait a minute we don't know if the woman was the mother of this child.If so maybe the parents aren't together and maybe she's been to court trying to have this druggie kept away from the child.But if you've ever gone to family court you would no that is so hard to do,know matter how bad the other parent is.Or maybe the woman was a grandmother or other relative.The last thing you would want is cps involved only if that's the last choice.Because that's a other can of worms.

For "some funny reason" two of my posts on this thread have been "disappeared". No bad language was used. Somehow I think "someone", a someone practically named in one of the posts has been "exerting influence".

I asked questions "somebody" doesn't want asked.

This should be a wakeup call.

Well, now they're back! Make up your minds.

Sere Ball wrote:

<quoted text>
Which town CAN declare "victory" on "Drugs, Gangs, Murder, Rape, Assault, Robbery, Burglary, Vandalism".
Seriously, why not think for a second before posting such ridiculousness?

Silly progressive blowing smoke - while the community falls apart. Santa Cruz is the most violent city on the coast - one of the most violent in California. Look it up. Progressive dim wits live in denial while drug addicts and gang bangers and kill each other. This city has excessively high rates of rape and sex assaults, burglary, murder. Must I go on? You - living in denile - will ignore such facts and throw up your hands and say "what can be done?" "what can anyone do?". Progressives will play slight of hang and pass "rental inspections" to divert attention, or post meaning less signs like "nuclear free zone". All meaningless stunts. Meanwhile, the rapes, murders, drug dealing , drug use continues. Children are victimized, and progressives feel smug about it.

SC Midtown wrote:

This shows that more people should call in suspicious and erratic behavior/driving...

What kind of car do you drive? I will be on the look out for you.

Frankie wrote:

<quoted text>
SC Midtown thinks "reactionary" is a dirty word. SCM doesn't seem to realize "reaction" to evil is quite normal in normal people.
SC Midtown thinks "neanderthals" are dirty people. "Neanderthal" genetics is strewn throughout White European peoples. SCM has an anti-neanderthal bigotry problem?
My guess is that SC Midtown is also a White-hating liberal "racist".
As usual, the "anti-racists" are actually Anti-White ... one way or another. You just have to scratch below the surface ... or wait for them to reveal themselves like SC Midtown did.

So true -- "anti-racist" now means "anti-white."

Frankie wrote:

Well, now they're back! Make up your minds.

That happens to me too.

My guess is...
1) anti-white racists attempt to have comments they find particularly embarrassing to their agenda censored...
2) so they hit their "Report Abuse" buttons and...
3) Topix pulls the comments until they can review them and...
4) if they deem them acceptable, they put them back in the forum.

Just a guess.

Police scanners wrote:

<quoted text>
This is what I suspect the meth dealer/cooker in my apartment complex uses.

So if you're serious, have you reported it?

Frankie wrote:

<quoted text>
Pat, IMHO the term Alien doesn't need the legal/illegal modification.
For most of America's history it was White and European, and it only began to go downhill once the 1965 Hart-Cellar immigration act drastically changed the rules.
The early 1920's immigration act had preserved the White European Gentile character of America, so it's identity wasn't subject to radical change. The 1965 turned that on its head, with preferences for non-White ethnicities rather than the White European Gentile demographic.
It's been known for at least two thousand years that putting different races/ethnicities under one national umbrella leads to inevitable conflict.
It doesn't matter whether they are "legal" or "illegal". Unassimilable groups allowed to colonize a relatively homogeneous nation are always "outsiders". If they gain enough population to affect the political structure, a nation destabilizes and eventually falls apart.
This is what we are now witnessing .... but few are willing to admit it.
People use the "illegal" term so they can avoid being called "racists". This term was invented to demoralize White Peoples into allowing their space to be colonized and themselves replaced in the spaces they created. This is why "anti-racism" is actually anti-White.
"Legal" or "illegal" status doesn't matter: race-replacement is Genocide no matter what you call it.

I'm familiar with your point of view, and it's no less valid than other races promoting their interests.

I prefer the company of serious conservationists, regardless of race. Generally speaking, like most people of whatever race, I feel more comfortable around people of my own race.

But I prefer the company of a non-white with a strong conservation ethic over a white nature-destroyer. A strong conservation ethic recogizes the human race is vastly overpopulated, and does not make excuses for overbreeding by anyone.

Pat Kittle wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm familiar with your point of view, and it's no less valid than other races promoting their interests.
I prefer the company of serious conservationists, regardless of race. Generally speaking, like most people of whatever race, I feel more comfortable around people of my own race.
But I prefer the company of a non-white with a strong conservation ethic over a white nature-destroyer. A strong conservation ethic recogizes the human race is vastly overpopulated, and does not make excuses for overbreeding by anyone.

Pat, I'm always happy to hold open the Overton Window for you!

Frankie wrote:

<quoted text>
Pat, I'm always happy to hold open the Overton Window for you!

Thanks to Google, I don't have to say duh what's an Overton Window.

Now that I've looked it up, I must return the compliment (it was a compliment, right?).

I will hold the window open for you too. Here's a preview:
http://www.rewilding.org/thesixthgreatextinct...

Pat Kittle wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks to Google, I don't have to say duh what's an Overton Window.
Now that I've looked it up, I must return the compliment (it was a compliment, right?).
I will hold the window open for you too. Here's a preview:
http://www.rewilding.org/thesixthgreatextinct...

Get a room!

ouch wrote:

I knew they had scanners, they disappear before police show up.

i think this happens with incorrigible criminal types a lot more than the police realize. that means they have a jump on the police. and that is scary.

"Gated communities don’t exist for no reason and

Skin Heads don’t pop up in Mayberry.

Half of this country is on mood altering anti-depressants for a reason.

And I would venture to speculate that the reason for the dramatic jump in gun sales over the past half a decade is directly linked to the increasing presence of illegal immigrants in people’s towns and neighborhoods.

The question is, what is causing the anti-PC sentiment?

Books?

Or a walk down main street?"