Guns in restaurants draw stares but little outcry

[Monty]

Wooden Tooth wrote:

it never even occured to me that they put it in the amendment itself. what a joke i am.
a woman or black couldn' vote then, and i really wish they had no rights, so the idea that the right to "bear arms" (stupid wording because i have bear feet) is universal is a joke is my logic is shaky is now.
it really had nothing to do with facts, it had to do with my lack of self control militias? i don't get it?
man, am i slow.

For once we agree, you're slow.

[Monty]

Wooden Tooth wrote:

it's illegal to even have a gun in your house in NYC, unless you get a permit, which they only give to pigs like the ones i date and jewlery businessmen that i buy my necklaces from except the pearl necklaces that i troll the alleys for.

It's about time you finally fessed up and told the turth. Congratulations, I didn't think you had it in you.

[Allen Wrench]

Pat Henry wrote:

You anti-gun folks just don't know what pro-gunners are aware of. Unless you too are followers of UN plan to disarm US. First.. destroy their economy, then disarm, then make them subjects.

thank You for mentioning this, most Sheeple are completely ignorant of this.

As far as open-carry of firearms...I say go for it,( but KNOW Your laws!) in fact most law enforcement officers actually don't even know the laws pertaining to this in their City/County/State.

I don't trust My local PD with protecting Me, or My Family.

[Monty]

Wooden Tooth wrote:

everything i post that's a bunch of blarney and you know it. there are endless lies and odd ideas. so i guess you agree with a "perfect vacuum" between my left ear and my right ear?
marshall tucker was smarter than me. he was pleased with the way i appeased his nuts and then intentionally left them out to consume later. I mean, how hard would i get him ? you know nothing of the depths of my depravity.

Finally, you got thato ff your chest. Let the healing begin!

[Plant Lady]

cat wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm sanctimonious? Or, am I a prude? Do you even know what you are typing (or copying from someone else)? I don't know if you're male or female (notice I didn't say man or woman)...but the 'tsk tsk' thing...now, that's got us wondering!!

Do you have a mouse in your drawers mojigato or is that the 'royal' we?

Just curious, why would it matter if I am male or female , prefer males or females or if I am a man or woman or if I prefer a man or a woman?

After all mojigato, as you said...does it matter what I post here?

btw- I prefer the castillian - that arrogance and sanctimoniousness all rolled up together in one. There just isn't a good English word to replace it is there? I cannot answer to your prudishness...hasn't been an issue...o wait I take that back...you do seem to think that a person's gender or sexual orientation is germane to the discussion at hand. So maybe you are a prude as well.

[Annexal]

I would have left any restaurant with a customer with a gun. In fact I would like to move to a country with stiffer gun laws.

[Monty]

Dave wrote:

<quoted text>

I say it now to every member of the Armed Forces or fellow Veteran I meet.

As do I. Thank you for your service.

[Jack Burton]

Annexal wrote:

I would have left any restaurant with a customer with a gun. In fact I would like to move to a country with stiffer gun laws.

Bye....

[Dave]

Mark wrote:

Funny how the NRA says, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people." Sure. Keep the veil over your eyes...

Wake up.

Once again, a simple test with a simple answer.

You have to spend one night in jail.

You are given your choice of two jail cells. Each has two beds.

Cell #1- The other bed is occupied by a 300lb., murderer/rapist with no gender preferences.

Cell #2- The other bed contains fully automatic, fully loaded, terrible firearms. Real assault rifles, semi-auto pistols and large caliber revolvers. Every anti-gunner's worst nightmare of an arsenal.

Where you gonna bunk, ace?

[Monty]

Wooden Tooth wrote:

wow what a kook and loser i am. a real internet stalker. definitely a gay or something.
my address? to a strange so called "man" on the internet? sure! that's how i get most of my "dates", i am such a "looser".
this is why i like to suck on gun nuts, this bandit fellow, i'm fantasizing about his nuts.

Whoa!! TOO MUCH INFORMATION!!!

[Monty]

Wooden Tooth wrote:

to all you killers in Iraq, stop trying to kill my butt buddies. we have orgies where i get my fill and you are distracting them and making our circle jerk a bust. now i go hungry. let them get back to bombing innocent civilians and children. they they are doing the work i wish i could.

You could always go over there to get your fill, sphincter boy.

[Geno]

I saw a bumper sticker in the burbs today that read: GUNS KILL PEOPLE LIKE SPOONS MADE ROSIE O'DONNELL FAT!

I almost had to pull off to the side of the road I was laughing so hard.

[Monty]

Annexal wrote:

I would have left any restaurant with a customer with a gun.

Not if the criminals don't want you to leave.

Annexal wrote:

In fact I would like to move to a country with stiffer gun laws.

You have the freedom and no one is stopping you.

[Plant Lady]

Annexal wrote:

I would have left any restaurant with a customer with a gun. In fact I would like to move to a country with stiffer gun laws.

Isn't it a scary thought for you that you probably already have been dining next to someone who carries a gun?

O my stars how ever did you live through it!?

Maybe you shopped right be side me at the local supermarket.

AND YOU WERE RIGHT THERE...unharmed..imagine that.

My gun hasn't attacked anyone in the years I have carried it. It is a legally carry concealed weapon.

You think you have never been near a criminal with intent to do harm to you?

Think again.

Which would you really rather be closer to?

[cat]

Annexal wrote:

I would have left any restaurant with a customer with a gun. In fact I would like to move to a country with stiffer gun laws.

I don't know about laws..but definitely for you a stiffer something - I guarantee that leaving anywhere with 'a customer with a gun'-you are the victim there. Watch what you wish for!

[Pray for change]

visit www.ourrockyhill.com and read all about the Goldberg case.

[Mock26]

WOODY from ST JAMES wrote:

I THINK I SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CARRY MY HANDGUN ANYWHERE I WANT TO.....OUT IN THE OPEN, OR CONCEALED....AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT....TOOOOO BAD!!!!!!....MOVE TO FRANCE!!!!!

So long as you are in public I agree with you. But, even though privately owned businesses grant public access to patrons they are still legally allowed to set rules of conduct within their establishment. And that includes telling armed people that they are not welcome. If a business says that guns are not welcome and someone enters with a gun then that business has a legal right to refuse service and ask those people to leave. If those people refuse then the police can be called in and remove those people.

[SAM]

Semi-literate wrote:

<quoted text>
You do,of course, realize how FEW people in Colonial America actually owned weapons, or could afford to own weapons?, nothing against people carrying.

Well, enough people owned and used weapons to beat the hell out of the British, the most powerful military on Earth at that time...

[Monty]

SAM wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, enough people owned and used weapons to beat the hell out of the British, the most powerful military on Earth at that time...

Hat tip, SAM!!

[Justifiably Bellicose]

Wooden Tooth wrote:

More people die from accidental guns than are saved by so-called "heroes" using guns.
The more anti gun laws NYC passes, the less crime there is.

Well, now that guns are essentially BANNED in NYC, and the crime rate has leveled off, how do you get at the rest of the crime that continues to happen? You can't ban guns more than banned, so what's left?

The 2nd Amendment was NEVER intended to give a private citizen the right to possess a gun. What are you, morons who can't read? It says for MILITIAS.

The Constitution is the document in which the People tell the Government what it is allowed to do (and not allowed to do). It is not a source for the People's rights. If it did not exist, the people would not have zero rights. We did not wait for its ratification before we felt we had those rights. You (as is typical) have it all backward and upside-down.

And where "it says militias," it says that because militias are necessary to the security of freedom, the right of the people to keep and bear arms is to be protected from infringement. The framers were saying that because there are reasons (and listed one) why it's good to have an armed populace, the government is not to be allowed to infringe on the right of the citizens to have guns and to bear them.