|
Jennie
|
give me a break wrote: <quoted text>
That's the problem with people today, they keep their heads out of the Bible. I beg to differ. I consider myself agnostic and I do not think that I have some kind of "problem" because I don't read the Bible. I still try to do what I think is right, but I don't need to attach my sense of morality to an established religion. Tolerance is key here. What would you do if your son/daughter told you he/she was gay? Would you still have the same attitude? What happened to "love thy neighbor"?
|
|
“Beyond the Pale”
Joined: May 4, 2007
|
give me a break wrote: There is only one true Creator Yes, and his name is Ahura Mazda. Or was it Ptah? ... Wait, wait, it's Brahma! All praise Brahma, the one true creator! -pb
|
|
steve
|
I was driving a Mazda Brahma for a while. Sweet ride.
|
|
Butt Lover
|
Masculine White Male 40 6'1" 7" cut - seeking same for butt sex and mutual masturbation.
|
|
Linguist
|
"State Senate tables bill against gay marriage" Tuesday, May 06, 2008 By Tom Barnes, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette HARRISBURG -- The state Senate this evening voted to table a bill that would have amended the state constitution to ban gay marriage... http://www.postgazette.com/pg/08127/879544-10...
|
|
“ACLU: protecting your rights”
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
|
Thanks for posting this, Linguist! It's nice to know that sanity still has some influence in Pennsylvania. Linguist wrote: "State Senate tables bill against gay marriage" Tuesday, May 06, 2008 By Tom Barnes, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette HARRISBURG -- The state Senate this evening voted to table a bill that would have amended the state constitution to ban gay marriage... http://www.postgazette.com/pg/08127/879544-10...
|
|
“Wag more, bark less”
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
|
That's rediculous about PA!!!! Why would you outlaw so many divorces? "Stay together for the kids" has been proven to be a harmful idea, and outlawing the ability of a couple to divorce if they no longer feel their relationship is healthy is rediculous!
|
|
“ACLU: protecting your rights”
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
|
It was a strategy used to show how ridiculous banning same-gender marriage is by introducing an equally ridiculous amendment to the bill. BmoreTeacher wrote: That's rediculous about PA!!!! Why would you outlaw so many divorces? "Stay together for the kids" has been proven to be a harmful idea, and outlawing the ability of a couple to divorce if they no longer feel their relationship is healthy is rediculous!
|
|
|
|
“Make theTruth YOUR OWN”
Joined: Apr 1, 2008
Lorain Ohio
|
give me a break wrote: Adam and Eve, not steve.
There is a reason that God made made to have a **** and a woman a vagina.
Husband and wife.
yes, we are not to judge, but we can warn. God did not intend man and man to lay together.
If you are God fearing, it does mention it is not right.
Don't be mad @ me, God made the rules. I totally Agree with YOU
|
|
Mary
|
In the dictionary the meaning of marriage was the joining of man and woman. Marriage between the same sex where is that stated in the dictionary. I think not using the
word marriage would make the decision of uniting two of the same
sex, or partnership would be better
accept by most. They are law abiding
citzens they should be able to be
given the same laws as those who are married. What we expect from married couples behavior should be
the same for them.
|
|
“ACLU: protecting your rights”
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
|
The dictionary doesn't tell us how to use words, it shows how words are used in society, as such the dictionary changes as society does. Of all the arguments against marriage equality, the dictionary definition argument is the weakest one out there (not that they're all pretty weak). Mary wrote: In the dictionary the meaning of marriage was the joining of man and woman. Marriage between the same sex where is that stated in the dictionary. I think not using the
word marriage would make the decision of uniting two of the same
sex, or partnership would be better
accept by most. They are law abiding
citzens they should be able to be
given the same laws as those who are married. What we expect from married couples behavior should be
the same for them.
|
|
Redneck
|
I likes how they say the "stage" is set....bunch of girlie men playin house in play....letem pork each other but not on my tax dollars
|
|
Kenny
|
If GOD says being gay is worng then its worng. By the way no one is born gay GOD makes no mistakes!!! So put that in your butt and smoke it!!
|
|
“Beyond the Pale”
Joined: May 4, 2007
|
Kenny wrote: If GOD says being gay is worng then its worng. By the way no one is born gay GOD makes no mistakes!!! So put that in your butt and smoke it!! It's kind of hard to be wrong if you're imaginary. -pb
|
|
“ACLU: protecting your rights”
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
|
You're right, God doesn't make mistakes, it's anti-gay bigots like you that make mistakes in not recognizing the basic humanity of all people, including gay people. Kenny wrote: If GOD says being gay is worng then its worng. By the way no one is born gay GOD makes no mistakes!!! So put that in your butt and smoke it!!
|
|
steve
|
Redneck wrote: I likes how they say the "stage" is set....bunch of girlie men playin house in play....letem pork each other but not on my tax dollars Haha. That is hilarious, but I'm not sure how letting gays marry each other would translate to you footing the bill for them porking. How exactly would that work?
|
|
chris
|
why should anyone enjoy less rights than you are entitled too? because you think so? i know a couple whove been together 35 years, how is their union any less valid than a marriage...is britney spears 55 hour marriage a better example of marriage than these two men? and if you have to resort to a religious argument , than that is really lame.... Randal wrote: It is proof that we are living in a sick Liberal world that this is even being considered. Can anyone imagine us even discussing legalizing gay marriage 40 years ago? 20 years ago? 10 years ago? The population has been conditioned to the point of seeing this as something possible now.
Lib activists always push too far and they implement the incremental Slippery Slope to do it. First it was tolerate gays… then it was accept gays… then it was celebrate Gay and force feed it to school children as just another fine and dandy lifestyle… pro-gay propaganda movies… then Gayborhoods and gay liaisons… then came the demands… benefits… now gay marriage.
Gays should just be thankful for all the progress they have enjoyed, that they are no longer publicly ridiculed and killed and leave it at that.
|
|
chris
|
well at least satan knows how to throw a party!!!!! lol....i can almost picture you know...tons of eyeliner and a jiffy pop hairdo....which of your eight daughters works at the dairy queen? Tammy wrote: Gay people do have a death wish.Eternity in ****.No I am not judging gays I know what the good book says.They can change before its to late.
|
|
Redneck
|
steve wrote: <quoted text>
Haha. That is hilarious, but I'm not sure how letting gays marry each other would translate to you footing the bill for them porking. How exactly would that work? Lets see if they are married...do they get SS benefits upon death of one of them?
|
|
steve
|
Tammy wrote: Gay people do have a death wish.Eternity in ****.No I am not judging gays I know what the good book says.They can change before its to late. As if it's not hard enough to grow up gay in a world of bible thumping freaks like you, your "final solution" is to have these folks pretend they are straight? So I guess lying about who you are is better then banging someone the same sex as you. If you can convince me that makes sense, I'll come over and paint your entire house with only my schlong.
|
NBC 10 Philadelphia Forum
