|
Joined: Mar 4, 2008
|
Anonymous2 wrote: all you homosexual weirdo's will get your civil union BUT NO MARRIAGE!
california keeps voting against this sickness and will stay that way.
GET USED TO IT! The polls disagree with you. The polls show a majority in California will vote against the proposed amendment. Sorry if that bothers you.
|
|
Joined: Mar 4, 2008
|
Steve wrote: <quoted text>
Liar. Most judges throughout America avoid placing children in jeopardy in homosexual homes.
A number of other states also have restrictions that prevent children from being placed with homosexual "couples."
You are actually on the wrong thread. This on is discussion the ridiculous oxymoron of homosexual "marriage."
You have no logical case for your cause. Your ridiculous political charade has been exposed as the fraud that it is. No homosexual relationshit shares the reasons for govenment involvement in marriage.
Call logic and justice "hate" all you want. That is no excuse for the unjustifiable tyranny you advocate. The ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage" remains exposed as the fraud that it is.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron.
Homosexuals are NOT the same as other people. They seldom form longterm exclusive
relationships, often completely obsess on perversion, and have much elevated rates of many diseases and social ills. THIS is the reality.
No homosexual "marriage" is recognized by the US Government. We have a democratically established national definition of marriage as solely between one man and one woman.
No law could ever make even one homosexual relationship into a real marriage. It is of course ludicrous to claim that "equal rights" are involved in trying to disenfranchise others on the legal definition of marriage.
Homosexual "marriage" is a complete FRAUD.
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be "GLBT" anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging. Hi Wil aka Steve! Your junk science has been refuted a million times. Simply stating the same lies over and over again won't make it true. Sorry!
|
|
Joined: Jan 3, 2008
|
Shadow Dragon wrote: <quoted text>
Sound to me you secretly wanna join, THEN COME OUT AND ADMIT YOU ARE GAY AS THREE DOLLAR BILL, FOR CHRIST'S SAKES. it's "as **** as a three dollar bill," not "as gay as..."
|
|
“TROLLS BEWARE!!!”
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
Orange County,CA
|
PaveTheRedwoods wrote: <quoted text>
it's "as **** as a three dollar bill," not "as gay as..." ****,Gay whatever.
|
|
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
|
There are two kinds of marriage, civil and religious.
Homosexual can already get married in the eyes of God, so why not in the eyes of the government that we support with not only our money, but also our lives.
To those against same sex marriage, I promise not to get married in your church if you promise to let me get married in mine. What is so hard to understand about equal civil rights…
And here’s a bet no one seems to want to take. I’ve offered it to Bill O’reily and to Wil, but they don’t have any donuts to bet against my dollars.
Since same sex marriage has been legal in Massachusetts, who do you think has the highest divorce rate? I will bet anyone, dollars to donuts, that the heterosexual divorce rate is higher. Any takers? I thought not.
Well it’s straights by over two to one.
Since homosexual marriage has been legal in Massachusetts, only 8% of same-sex marriages have ended in divorce, but almost 18% of opposite sex marriages have.
And I’m betting California will continue this trend….
|
|
Joined: May 31, 2008
|
Steve wrote: <quoted text>
Liar. Most judges throughout America avoid placing children in jeopardy in homosexual homes.
A number of other states also have restrictions that prevent children from being placed with homosexual "couples."
You are actually on the wrong thread. This on is discussion the ridiculous oxymoron of homosexual "marriage."
You have no logical case for your cause. Your ridiculous political charade has been exposed as the fraud that it is. No homosexual relationshit shares the reasons for govenment involvement in marriage.
Call logic and justice "hate" all you want. That is no excuse for the unjustifiable tyranny you advocate. The ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage" remains exposed as the fraud that it is.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron.
Homosexuals are NOT the same as other people. They seldom form longterm exclusive
relationships, often completely obsess on perversion, and have much elevated rates of many diseases and social ills. THIS is the reality.
No homosexual "marriage" is recognized by the US Government. We have a democratically established national definition of marriage as solely between one man and one woman.
No law could ever make even one homosexual relationship into a real marriage. It is of course ludicrous to claim that "equal rights" are involved in trying to disenfranchise others on the legal definition of marriage.
Homosexual "marriage" is a complete FRAUD.
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be "GLBT" anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging. WillyBea!!!!! Yeah!!!!!
|
|
Joined: Jan 3, 2008
|
Shadow Dragon wrote: <quoted text>
****,Gay whatever. you're not mel brooks "why don't you make like a tree and get the hell outta here!" "it's make like a tree and LEAVE, you sound like a MORON when you say it!"
|
|
anonymous
|
AT least you all are interesting bigots. A better read than the bigotry toward African Americans, for example.
Come on...bring on more hate, judgement and fear...I want to see this thread go to 500 entries based upon all the nastiness that Humboldters and others can pile up against gay people....
I know you got it in you, please show me some more of that good old time religion....
|
|
|
|
SNJ
|
CCC wrote: Finally the Supreme Court makes the right decision!
Prop 8 is neither hateful nor discriminatory. Please vote to keep marriage sacred between a man and a woman the way God intended it.
Just because a person chooses to have morals and live by a higher standard, does not make them full of hate. In fact, I see more hate coming from gay people who think having a perverted lifestyle somehow entitles them to some kind of special treatment, and they hate anyone who disagrees with them!
Yes, I do hate, I hate the sin, but not the sinner. Your post boils down to labeling yourself an evil-minded hypocrite. I cannot even feel sorry for you. Don't use God and the Bible as your witness. Nothing on this earth has created so much suffering and unnatural deaths as religion. Christians have been in the lead most of the time. I am not gay and not a muslim (for record only).
|
|
Anonymous2
|
Patrick in Texas wrote: <quoted text>
The polls disagree with you. The polls show a majority in California will vote against the proposed amendment. Sorry if that bothers you. Sorry BrokeBack MtnBoy..but it will fail. The polls are biased and dont properly reflect the geographic population of California. This is well known. We will know for SURE in a few months when Prop 8 PASSES. But then you will all cry foul & hatred.
|
|
“TROLLS BEWARE!!!”
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
Orange County,CA
|
Anonymous2 wrote: <quoted text>
Sorry BrokeBack MtnBoy..but it will fail. The polls are biased and dont properly reflect the geographic population of California. This is well known.
We will know for SURE in a few months when Prop 8 PASSES.
But then you will all cry foul & hatred. What if it fails, then you then one crying foul.
|
|
Joined: Mar 4, 2008
|
Anonymous2 wrote: <quoted text>
Sorry BrokeBack MtnBoy..but it will fail. The polls are biased and dont properly reflect the geographic population of California. This is well known.
We will know for SURE in a few months when Prop 8 PASSES.
But then you will all cry foul & hatred. It sure will be enjoyable when you eat crow come November.
|
|
Say wha
|
Anonymous2 wrote: <quoted text>
Sorry BrokeBack MtnBoy..but it will fail. The polls are biased and dont properly reflect the geographic population of California. This is well known.
We will know for SURE in a few months when Prop 8 PASSES.
But then you will all cry foul & hatred. What does "geographic population" mean? Trees and mountains? Did you mean "demographics"? You sorta screwed your credibility there, genius.
|
|
Thurfer Howat
|
Say wha wrote: <quoted text>
What does "geographic population" mean? Trees and mountains? Did you mean "demographics"? You sorta screwed your credibility there, genius. Oh he did that a loooooooooong time ago.
|
|
“LIVE LARGE”
Joined: Apr 26, 2008
|
Telling the Gay Community, that was so in my face about their court approved , hijacking of the peoples will , that this would be voted on by the people again , FREE! LOL!
Seeing it has taken place and those from the community that assured me that it would never make the ballot , are now having to rescind their gloating about their anti democracy short lived win , PRICELESS!!!!!!!!!!
LMAO!
|
|
“LIVE LARGE”
Joined: Apr 26, 2008
|
Come November , justice and democracy will be restored as the will of the majority of people in this state will decide this issue and not some whacko judge , that is trying to legislate from the bench.
I heard Massachusetts is nice this time of year. Perhaps that would be a more compatible environment for your needs.
|
|
Anonymous2
|
Shadow Dragon wrote: <quoted text>
What if it fails, then you then one crying foul. No, I will accept the law, something your gay agenda cant do! You have already admitted you will keep going until things turn your way.. pathetic losers!
|
|
Anonymous2
|
Say wha wrote: <quoted text>
What does "geographic population" mean? Trees and mountains? Did you mean "demographics"? You sorta screwed your credibility there, genius. Is that the 'BEST' you got? please. please. But what should I expect from a bunch of heathen sinners?
|
|
“TROLLS BEWARE!!!”
Joined: Jun 11, 2008
Orange County,CA
|
Anonymous2 wrote: <quoted text>
No, I will accept the law, something your gay agenda cant do! You have already admitted you will keep going until things turn your way.. pathetic losers! You just prove my point.
|
|
Anonymous2
|
Shadow Dragon wrote: <quoted text>
You just prove my point. That I can accept a law, and the gays wont? yes you prove the point very well.
|
Eureka Times Standard Forum