Aether, Again !!

Posted in the Physics Forum

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 32 of32
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
nakayama

Tokyo, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Nov 7, 2012
 
How about diurnal aberration of the moon at the pole of the earth ? If it’s 0, emission theory (in moon-earth scale) seems to be true.

And why on the moon, annual aberration is not subject ?

A web-site says “planetary aberration is combination of aberration and light-time correction”. Yes, light-time correction must be grasped as angle. Time is not main subject at all, i believe (so, naming is wrong).
nakayama

Tokyo, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Nov 10, 2012
 
Why annual aberration caused by earth’s motion (30 km/sec) doesn’t occur on the moon ? In moon-earth scale, emission theory will be valid. And many facts (such as corner cube set on the moon’s surface) will support it.
nakayama

Tokyo, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Nov 17, 2012
 
Value of light-time correction for the moon is 0.704 arcsec (corresponds to moon’s speed on orbit). And annual aberration (20.496 arcsec ; max) is not observable for the moon. These are different fundamentally from observational facts for all celestial bodies (except for artificial bodies ; earth’s motion 30 km/sec is not reflected).

Reason will be nothing but nearby distance (imagine an instant). The emission theory will be true (in moon-earth scale).
nakayama

Tokyo, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Nov 17, 2012
 
In moon-earth scale, emission theory seems to be valid. If so, understanding as follows will be possible (if there is no mistake).

Imagine that two horizontal lines and a vertical line cross. The moon is situated at the upper intersection and the earth is at the lower. Point of this thought experiment is an instant when the moon moves horizontally. Now, value of light-time correction for the moon is 0.704 arcsec (corresponds to moon’s speed on orbit). But is it true ? It will be possible to say that the earth is moving (because there is no rest frame). If so, this value will be possible to be regard as value of aberration (on the earth).

In moon-earth scale, real aberration and real light-time correction will not exist (because aether doesn’t act at all).
nakayama

Tokyo, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Nov 19, 2012
 
In the above figure, replace the moon and the earth with two space ships.

Distance between the moon and the earth is measured to meter level (with light beam). This will mean that emission theory is valid in moon earth scale (if aether acts, difference km level will be measured).
nakayama

Tokyo, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Nov 20, 2012
 
-Annual aberration for the moon ; An Apology- i forgot my view that i posted before.

A light source and an observer move in a uniform motion at the same speed (along parallel lines ; imagine an instant only). The observer doesn’t observe aberration, because aberration is offset fully by light-time correction (each is composed of v and c). About secular aberration for the sun (seen from the earth), it will be the same. But about the moon, thing is different if emission theory is valid (in moon-earth scale). Anyway, annual aberration for the moon is not observable.
nakayama

Tokyo, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Nov 21, 2012
 
Imagine a figure that is shown in the above post (Nov 17). Along the lower line, two space ships are moving at different speed. One observes value 0.704 arcsec and the other 1.408 arcsec. What is this value ? This value will be recognized as not light-time correction (like) but aberration (like).
nakayama

Nihon'odori, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Jun 24, 2013
 
It's reconsideration on previous post (Oct 17 2012) ; "Does light-time correction occur in earthly scale (in vacuum)?"

On the north pole, it will be detectable when light beam are emitted to right and left (with moving direction of the earth). Reason is that speed of orbital motion of the earth is 30km/sec, so, beam's sliding will several cm per 100m (if the emission theory is not true). However, it needs enough level of vacuum.
nakayama

Yokohama, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Oct 29, 2013
 
In outer space, there is a pillar made of glass (floating horizontally : section is square : we see a long side). From the upper right and the upper left, two star lights are coming. Wavelength is supposed to be the same. When wavelength in the glass is the same also, the glass is at a standstill in aether (in x direction).

P.S. The above is based on the view that light speed is variable.
nakayama

Yokohama, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Nov 1, 2013
 
Allow me to rewrite my former post(sep 7 2009) as follows.

In outer space, a box is floating. To the roof, plane waves of a star (the first gratitude) are coming just horizontally. On the roof, there is a small hole. So, on the floor, a spot-light is projected. Angle of light ray in the box will not be 90 degrees angle generally.

With two stars, box’s motion relative to aether (in x, y, z direction) will be measured.
nakayama

Yokohama, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Dec 23, 2013
 
It’s unthinkable that motion relative to nothing causes change of momentum. Uniform linear motion will be a motion that follows aether frame.
nakayama

Tokyo, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Dec 24, 2013
 
When frequency and wavelength of two star lights (that are coming from the opposite direction) are measured (in outer space), state of observer’s motion (relative to aether) will be clarified. And with four stars, direction and speed (relative to the celestial sphere) will be clarified also.

P.S. Light speed relative to aether will be clarified.
P.S. Speed of aether drift may be dozens of km/sec. Above measurement will not be easy.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 21 - 32 of32
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••