Cycads are not "living fossils" from ...

Cycads are not "living fossils" from Dinosaur Age

There are 2 comments on the UC Berkeley story from Oct 21, 2011, titled Cycads are not "living fossils" from Dinosaur Age. In it, UC Berkeley reports that:

Today's cycads - plants famed as "living fossils" because they've survived since the last dinosaurs munched on them 65.5 million years ago - are really only a few million years old, according to a new study by University of California, Berkeley, scientists and their international team.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at UC Berkeley.

“Taste my purging steel”

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#1 Oct 21, 2011
Are they high??? Cycads are older than Trex. I would love to see this genious. He could be the next Jack Horner.

“DoubleTheClaw, DoubleThePain”

Since: Aug 11

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

#2 Oct 21, 2011
Giganotosaurus wrote:
Are they high??? Cycads are older than Trex. I would love to see this genious. He could be the next Jack Horner.
Yup,how did he disprove fossil evidence,there're cycads fossils

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Paleontology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Digging in weird Wyoming cave yields ice age in... Aug 24 Xstain Fumblement... 1
News Changes in primate teeth linked to rise of monkeys Jul '16 Audi 5000 Mom 7
News Life-Size Noah's Ark To Open Amid A Flood Of Sk... Jul '16 Oops 6
News 'Savage' dog-sized dinosaur with serrated teeth... Jul '16 Urai Kucka 2
News Asteroid which destroyed dinosaurs 'wiped out n... Jun '16 Max 3
News Posted: 1 hour agoComments (0)Albert Einstein o... Jun '16 Medewiwin 1
Diversity is White Genocide Jun '16 67849hk5lh 1
More from around the web